Literature DB >> 36051628

Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.

Per T Ørskov1, Anne Norup2,3, Erin L Beatty1, Susanne M Jaeggi4.   

Abstract

In working memory training studies, individual trajectories are known to vary considerably between participants. A better understanding of how individual differences affect training outcomes is important because it might inform the development of more effective training interventions. This study explored how measures of working memory, intelligence, sustained attention, training motivation, mindset, psychological well-being, perceived stress, and sleep quality affect initial training performance and rate of change. A total of 217 upper secondary students completed 12 weeks of adaptive dual-n-back in a classroom setting. We analyzed their self-reported training data using latent growth curve modeling. We found that working memory and intelligence predicted both, initial training performance and rate of performance change. Sustained attention and sleep quality predicted initial performance, but not the rate of change. Furthermore, we observed that participants who completed the intervention scored significantly higher on measures of working memory and intelligence and reported lower levels of perceived stress and higher levels of sleep quality at baseline compared to dropouts. In general, our study supports the magnification account with higher ability individuals starting out at a higher performance level and showing a higher rate of performance change, and moreover, being more likely to adhere to the training protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive training; Individual differences; Intelligence; Latent growth curve modeling; Magnification account; Working memory; Working memory training

Year:  2021        PMID: 36051628      PMCID: PMC9431390          DOI: 10.1007/s41465-021-00216-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc        ISSN: 2509-3304


  64 in total

Review 1.  On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.

Authors:  Anna Soveri; Jan Antfolk; Linda Karlsson; Benny Salo; Matti Laine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  The Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Motivational Features to Boost Cognitive Training Outcome.

Authors:  Shafee Mohammed; Lauren Flores; Jenni Deveau; Russell Cohen Hoffing; Calvin Phung; Chelsea M Parlett; Ellen Sheehan; David Lee; Jacky Au; Martin Buschkuehl; Victor Zordan; Susanne M Jaeggi; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  Divergent Research Methods Limit Understanding of Working Memory Training.

Authors:  Valentina Pergher; Mahsa Alizadeh Shalchy; Anja Pahor; Marc M Van Hulle; Susanne M Jaeggi; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2019-05-09

5.  To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Victoria F Sisk; Alexander P Burgoyne; Jingze Sun; Jennifer L Butler; Brooke N Macnamara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-05

Review 6.  Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Monica Melby-Lervåg; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

Review 7.  Sleep-dependent memory consolidation.

Authors:  Robert Stickgold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of "Far Transfer": Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Monica Melby-Lervåg; Thomas S Redick; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-07

9.  Working Memory Training for Healthy Older Adults: The Role of Individual Characteristics in Explaining Short- and Long-Term Gains.

Authors:  Erika Borella; Elena Carbone; Massimiliano Pastore; Rossana De Beni; Barbara Carretti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Working Memory Capacity as a Predictor of Cognitive Training Efficacy in the Elderly Population.

Authors:  Olga Matysiak; Aleksandra Kroemeke; Aneta Brzezicka
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of working memory training on situation awareness in a flight simulator.

Authors:  Yue Zhou; Di Wu; Chaoxian Wang; Kewei Sun; Pengbo Xu; Ziwei Wang; Wei Xiao
Journal:  Cogn Technol Work       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.818

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.