Literature DB >> 30221244

The Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Motivational Features to Boost Cognitive Training Outcome.

Shafee Mohammed1, Lauren Flores2, Jenni Deveau2, Russell Cohen Hoffing2, Calvin Phung2, Chelsea M Parlett1, Ellen Sheehan1, David Lee1, Jacky Au1, Martin Buschkuehl3, Victor Zordan4, Susanne M Jaeggi1, Aaron R Seitz2.   

Abstract

In the current literature, there are a number of cognitive training studies that use N-back tasks as their training vehicle; however, the interventions are often bland, and many studies suffer from considerable attrition rates. An increasingly common approach to increase participant engagement has been the implementation of motivational features in training tasks; yet, the effects of such "gamification" on learning have been inconsistent. To shed more light on those issues, here, we report the results of a training study conducted at two Universities in Southern California. A total of 115 participants completed 4 weeks (20 sessions) of N-back training in the laboratory. We varied the amount of "gamification" and the motivational features that might make the training more engaging and, potentially, more effective. Thus, 47 participants trained on a basic color/identity N-back version with no motivational features, whereas 68 participants trained on a gamified version that translated the basic mechanics of the N-back task into an engaging 3D space-themed "collection" game (Deveau et al. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 243, 2015). Both versions used similar adaptive algorithms to increase the difficulty level as participants became more proficient. Participants' self-reports indicated that the group who trained on the gamified version enjoyed the intervention more than the group who trained on the non-gamified version. Furthermore, the participants who trained on the gamified version exerted more effort and also improved more during training. However, despite the differential training effects, there were no significant group differences in any of the outcome measures at post-test, suggesting that the inclusion of motivational features neither substantially benefited nor hurt broader learning. Overall, our findings provide guidelines for task implementation to optimally target participants' interest and engagement to promote learning, which may lead to broader adoption and adherence of cognitive training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain training; Cognitive training; Gamification; Motivation; Task engagement

Year:  2017        PMID: 30221244      PMCID: PMC6136448          DOI: 10.1007/s41465-017-0047-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc        ISSN: 2509-3304


  35 in total

1.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set.

Authors:  L P Shiu; H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  Kou Murayama; Madoka Matsumoto; Keise Izuma; Kenji Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015).

Authors:  Jacky Au; Martin Buschkuehl; Greg J Duncan; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

4.  Executive function, working memory, and medication adherence among older adults.

Authors:  Kathleen Insel; Daniel Morrow; Barbara Brewer; Aurelio Figueredo
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  D M Barch; T S Braver; L E Nystrom; S D Forman; D C Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Enhancing Working Memory Training with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Benjamin Katz; Martin Buschkuehl; Kimberly Bunarjo; Thea Senger; Chelsea Zabel; Susanne M Jaeggi; John Jonides
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

9.  Can impaired working memory functioning be improved by training? A meta-analysis with a special focus on brain injured patients.

Authors:  Juliane Weicker; Arno Villringer; Angelika Thöne-Otto
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency.

Authors:  Joonkoo Park; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluating environmental and inhibitory control strategies to improve outcomes in a widely available weight loss program.

Authors:  Nenette A Cáceres; Qihan Yu; Jessica Capaldi; Márcio Augusto Diniz; Hollie Raynor; Gary D Foster; Aaron R Seitz; Sarah-Jeanne Salvy
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.261

2.  Multisensory Facilitation of Working Memory Training.

Authors:  Anja Pahor; Cindy Collins; Rachel N Smith; Austin Moon; Trevor Stavropoulos; Ilse Silva; Elaine Peng; Susanne M Jaeggi; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2020-11-27

3.  Exploring Individuals' Willingness to Engage in Interventions to Improve Cognitive Health and Prolong Late-Life Independence: An Extension of Harrell, Kmetz, and Boot (2019).

Authors:  Danielle Onafraychuk; Edie C Sanders; Erin R Harrell; Walter R Boot
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2020-10-29

4.  Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.

Authors:  Per T Ørskov; Anne Norup; Erin L Beatty; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2021-06-07

5.  Training with an auditory perceptual learning game transfers to speech in competition.

Authors:  E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Mark A Philipp; Trevor Stavropoulos; Audrey Anna Carrillo; Sierra Cheung; Tess K Koerner; Michelle R Molis; Frederick J Gallun; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2021-09-21

6.  Impact of Visual Game-Like Features on Cognitive Performance in a Virtual Reality Working Memory Task: Within-Subjects Experiment.

Authors:  Eric Redlinger; Bernhard Glas; Yang Rong
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.143

Review 7.  Cognitive remediation for depression vulnerability: Current challenges and new directions.

Authors:  Yannick Vander Zwalmen; Kristof Hoorelbeke; Eveline Liebaert; Constance Nève de Mévergnies; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Development and testing of a game-based digital intervention for working memory training in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Surbhit Wagle; Arka Ghosh; P Karthic; Akriti Ghosh; Tarana Pervaiz; Rashmi Kapoor; Koumudi Patil; Nitin Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Application of Machine Learning Models for Tracking Participant Skills in Cognitive Training.

Authors:  Sanjana Sandeep; Christian R Shelton; Anja Pahor; Susanne M Jaeggi; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-22

10.  N-Back Related ERPs Depend on Stimulus Type, Task Structure, Pre-processing, and Lab Factors.

Authors:  Mahsa Alizadeh Shalchy; Valentina Pergher; Anja Pahor; Marc M Van Hulle; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.