Literature DB >> 22612437

Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review.

Monica Melby-Lervåg1, Charles Hulme.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that working memory training programs are effective both as treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other cognitive disorders in children and as a tool to improve cognitive ability and scholastic attainment in typically developing children and adults. However, effects across studies appear to be variable, and a systematic meta-analytic review was undertaken. To be included in the review, studies had to be randomized controlled trials or quasi-experiments without randomization, have a treatment, and have either a treated group or an untreated control group. Twenty-three studies with 30 group comparisons met the criteria for inclusion. The studies included involved clinical samples and samples of typically developing children and adults. Meta-analyses indicated that the programs produced reliable short-term improvements in working memory skills. For verbal working memory, these near-transfer effects were not sustained at follow-up, whereas for visuospatial working memory, limited evidence suggested that such effects might be maintained. More importantly, there was no convincing evidence of the generalization of working memory training to other skills (nonverbal and verbal ability, inhibitory processes in attention, word decoding, and arithmetic). The authors conclude that memory training programs appear to produce short-term, specific training effects that do not generalize. Possible limitations of the review (including age differences in the samples and the variety of different clinical conditions included) are noted. However, current findings cast doubt on both the clinical relevance of working memory training programs and their utility as methods of enhancing cognitive functioning in typically developing children and healthy adults. (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612437     DOI: 10.1037/a0028228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  361 in total

1.  Do We Really Become Smarter When Our Fluid-Intelligence Test Scores Improve?

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; Alexander A Petrov; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2015-01

Review 2.  Does learning to read shape verbal working memory?

Authors:  Catherine Demoulin; Régine Kolinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Working memory training in children: Effectiveness depends on temperament.

Authors:  Barbara Studer-Luethi; Catherine Bauer; Walter J Perrig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

4.  Brain network modularity predicts cognitive training-related gains in young adults.

Authors:  Pauline L Baniqued; Courtney L Gallen; Michael B Kranz; Arthur F Kramer; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Impaired Cognitive Flexibility and Working Memory Precedes Depression: A Rat Model to Study Depression.

Authors:  Margarita M Maramis; Marlina S Mahajudin; Junaidi Khotib
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.328

6.  Transfer of cognitive training across magnitude dimensions achieved with concurrent brain stimulation of the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Marinella Cappelletti; Erica Gessaroli; Rosalyn Hithersay; Micaela Mitolo; Daniele Didino; Ryota Kanai; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  On methodological standards in training and transfer experiments.

Authors:  C Shawn Green; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 8.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Grammatical Constraints on Language Switching: Language Control is not Just Executive Control.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 10.  Retest effects in working memory capacity tests: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jana Scharfen; Katrin Jansen; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.