| Literature DB >> 36050341 |
Oliver C Watkins1, Preben Selvam1, Reshma Appukuttan Pillai1, Victoria K B Cracknell-Hazra1,2,3, Hannah E J Yong2, Neha Sharma1, Amaury Cazenave-Gassiot4,5, Anne K Bendt5, Keith M Godfrey3,6, Rohan M Lewis3, Markus R Wenk4,5, Shiao-Yng Chan7,8.
Abstract
Transplacental docosahexaenoic-acid (DHA) supply for fetal development is regulated by placental DHA-lipid metabolism. Both maternal diabetes and obesity are linked to possible decreased fetal circulating DHA and increased placental DHA-lipids. Since myo-inositol is a promising intervention for gestational diabetes (GDM), we aimed to determine whether myo-inositol could rectify perturbations in placental DHA metabolism associated with maternal increasing glycemia and obesity and examine links with birthweight. Term placental villous explants from 17 women representing a range of BMIs and mid-gestational glycemia, were incubated with 13C-labeled-DHA for 48 h, in 0.3 µmol/L (control) or 60 µmol/L myo-inositol. Individual newly synthesized 13C-DHA-labeled lipid species were quantified by liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry. Compared with controls, incubation with myo-inositol decreased most 13C-DHA-lipids in placental explants from women with higher BMI or higher glycemia, but increased 13C-DHA-lipids with normal BMI or lower glycemia. Myo-inositol also increased 13C-DHA-labeled lipids in cases of lower birthweight centile, but induced decreases at higher centiles. Myo-inositol therefore lowered DHA-lipids in placenta with high basal placental DHA-lipid production (higher BMI and glycemia) but increased DHA-lipids where basal processing capacity is low. Myo-inositol thus moderates placental DHA metabolism towards a physiological mean which may in turn moderate birthweight.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36050341 PMCID: PMC9437079 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18309-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Associations between maternal BMI and 13C-DHA lipids in response to myo-inositol treatment (myo-inositol response). Myo-inositol response represents the relative amount of 13C-DHA lipid in placental explants treated with myo-inositol (60 µmol/L) compared with control explants from the same placenta. Positive values for myo-inositol response (log2-fold-change) indicate an increase in 13C-DHA lipids compared with the control (= 0), whilst negative values indicate a decrease. Linear regression was run with myo-inositol response as the outcome and BMI as the exposure/predictor variable (A). Solid lines show statistically significant associations while dashed lines show non-significant trends. Shaded areas show 95% confidence intervals. Purple: non GDM, Black: GDM. (B) Heat map illustrating myo-inositol response in placental explants from normal weight women (BMI < 23 kg/m2) and from overweight and obese women (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2). Positive values (red) indicate an increase in 13C-lipids while negative values (blue) indicate a decrease. Asterisks indicate significant differences between 60 µmol/L myo-inositol treatment and controls from the same placenta not treated with myo-inositol. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Benjamini–Hochberg was used to correct for multiple comparisons in all analyses.
Associations between BMI or maternal glycemia (fasting, 2 h post-load) with 13C-DHA lipid in response to myo-inositol treatment (myo-inositol response).
| 13C-lipid | Associations between BMI and myo-inositol responsea | Associations between fasting glycemia and myo-inositol responsea | Associations between 2 h glycemia and myo-inositol responsea | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (CI)b, unit/(kg/m2) | P (BH) value | Estimate (CI)b, unit/(mmol/L) | P (BH) value | Estimate (CI)b, unit/(mmol/L) | P (BH) value | |
| DG 38:6 | − 0.045 (− 0.095,0.005) | 0.081 | − 0.313 (− 0.851,0.226) | 0.238 | − 0.088 (− 0.24,0.064) | 0.248 |
| DG 40:7 | − 0.049 (− 0.105,0.007) | 0.083 | − 0.499 (− 1.065,0.067) | 0.08 | − 0.119 (− 0.284,0.046) | 0.146 |
| DG 40:8 | − 0.043 (− 0.087,0.001) | 0.056 | − 0.339 (− 0.807,0.128) | 0.143 | − 0.081 (− 0.216,0.054) | 0.218 |
| LPC 22:6 | − 0.091 (− 0.167,− 0.016) | 0.022 | − 0.503 (− 1.37,0.364) | 0.238 | − 0.13 (− 0.377,0.116) | 0.289 |
| LPE 22:6 | − 0.098 (− 0.213,0.016) | 0.095 | − 0.517 (− 1.762,0.728) | 0.396 | − 0.031 (− 0.391,0.33) | 0.872 |
| PC 38:6 | − 0.097 (− 0.17,− 0.025) | 0.017‡ | − 0.29 (− 1.184,0.603) | 0.542 | 0.017 (− 0.239,0.273) | 0.887 |
| PE-P 38:6 | − 0.095 (− 0.154,− 0.036) | 0.004†‡ | − 0.592 (− 1.313,0.129) | 0.107 | − 0.175 (− 0.376,0.027) | 0.1 |
| PE-P 40:6 | − 0.08 (− 0.142,− 0.018) | 0.017 | − 0.597 (− 1.286,0.092) | 0.087 | − 0.171 (− 0.365,0.023) | 0.09 |
| TG 54:6 | − 0.066 (− 0.121,− 0.011) | 0.03 | − 0.649 (− 1.205,− 0.093) | 0.03 | − 0.228 (− 0.366,− 0.09) | 0.005§ |
| TG 54:7 | − 0.072 (− 0.148,0.004) | 0.07 | − 0.738 (− 1.503,0.027) | 0.06 | − 0.265 (− 0.461,− 0.069) | 0.014 |
| TG 56:6 | − 0.066 (− 0.119,− 0.013) | 0.021† | − 0.729 (− 1.233,− 0.225) | 0.008§ | − 0.152 (− 0.313,0.01) | 0.076 |
| TG 56:7 | − 0.066 (− 0.12,− 0.013) | 0.018† | − 0.778 (− 1.266,− 0.29) | 0.004§ | − 0.185 (− 0.337,− 0.032) | 0.021 |
| TG 56:8 | − 0.071 (− 0.121,− 0.02) | 0.01 | − 0.631 (− 1.172,− 0.091) | 0.025 | − 0.189 (− 0.337,− 0.04) | 0.018 |
| TG 56:9 | − 0.071 (− 0.14,− 0.002) | 0.054 | − 0.821 (− 1.476,− 0.166) | 0.019 | − 0.243 (− 0.424,− 0.063) | 0.016 |
| TG 58:8 | − 0.077 (− 0.145,− 0.009) | 0.035 | − 0.698 (− 1.409,0.013) | 0.058 | − 0.206 (− 0.404,− 0.008) | 0.052 |
| TG 58:9 | − 0.074 (− 0.147,0) | 0.051 | − 0.948 (− 1.616,− 0.279) | 0.009§ | − 0.276 (− 0.461,− 0.091) | 0.006 |
| TG 58:10 | − 0.065 (− 0.125,− 0.006) | 0.034 | − 0.832 (− 1.366,− 0.298) | 0.005§ | − 0.226 (− 0.381,− 0.071) | 0.007 |
DG: diacylglycerols, DHA: docosahexaenoic acid, LPC: lyso-phosphatidylcholine, LPE: lyso-phosphatidylethanolamine, PC: phosphatidylcholine, PE: phosphatidylethanolamine, PE-P: phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogen, TG: triacylglycerol.
†Statistically significant after adjusting for fasting glycemia, ‡Statistically significant after adjusting for post-load glycemia (2 h), §Statistically significant after adjusting for BMI.
aMyo-inositol response represents the relative amount of 13C-DHA lipid in placental explants treated with myo-inositol (60 µmol/L) for 48 h compared with control explants from the same placenta not treated with myo-inositol.
bLinear regression was run with myo-inositol response as the outcome. The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method was used to correct for multiple testing.
Figure 2Associations between maternal glycemia (fasting or 2 h post-load) and 13C-DHA lipid in response to myo-inositol treatment (myo-inositol response). Myo-inositol response represents the relative amount of 13C-DHA lipid in placental explants treated with myo-inositol (60 µmol/L) compared with control explants from the same placenta not treated with myo-inositol. Positive values for myo-inositol response (log2-fold-change) indicate an increase in 13C-DHA lipids compared with control (= 0), whilst negative values indicate a decrease. Linear regression was run with myo-inositol response as the outcome and maternal glycemia as the exposure/predictor variable. The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method was used to correct for multiple testing. Solid lines show statistically significant associations, while dashed lines show non-significant trends. Shaded areas show 95% confidence intervals. Black: Normal BMI (< 23 kg/m2), Blue: overweight (BMI 23 to < 27.5 kg/m2), Pink: obese (BMI ≥ 27.5 kg/m2).
Figure 3The association of basal lipid processing capacity in control explants (no additional myo-inositol) with myo-inositol response. Myo-inositol response represents the relative amount of 13C-DHA lipid in placental explants treated with myo-inositol (60 µmol/L) compared with control explants from the same placenta not treated with myo-inositol. Linear regression was run with myo-inositol response (log2-fold-change) as the outcome and basal lipid processing (calculated by the formula (13C-DHA/ (13C-DHA + 12C-DHA)) Z-score, log2 transformed) as the predictor variable. The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method was used to correct for multiple testing. Solid lines show statistically significant associations while dashed lines show non-significant trends. Shaded areas show 95% confidence intervals. Colors indicate birthweight centile.
Association of basal lipid processing capacity in control explants with myo-inositol response and the association of myo-inositol response with birthweight centile.
| 13C-lipid | (A) Associations between basal lipid processing capacity and myo-inositol responsea | (B) Associations between birthweight centile and myo-inositol responsea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (CI), unit/(mmol/L) | P (BH) value | Estimate (CI), unit/(mmol/L) | P (BH) value | |
| DG 38:6 | − 0.055 (− 0.309,0.2) | 0.964 | − 29.127 (− 61.459,3.205) | 0.074 |
| DG 40:7 | − 0.063 (− 0.347,0.22) | 0.722 | − 29.09 (− 57.288,− 0.892) | 0.044 |
| DG 40:8 | − 0.047 (− 0.274,0.18) | 0.666 | − 30.132 (− 67.089,6.825) | 0.103 |
| LPC 22:6 | − 0.055 (− 0.466,0.357) | 0.982 | − 15.748 (− 36.423,4.928) | 0.125 |
| LPE 22:6 | − 0.203 (− 0.772,0.365) | 0.916 | − 9.201 (− 24.349,5.947) | 0.215 |
| PC 38:6 | − 0.4 (− 0.748,− 0.052) | 0.054 | − 19.848 (− 39.49,− 0.207) | 0.048 |
| PE-P 38:6 | − 0.31 (− 0.626,0.006) | 0.108 | − 25.267 (− 46.969,− 3.565) | 0.025 |
| PE-P 40:6 | − 0.188 (− 0.518,0.142) | 0.488 | − 23.876 (− 47.143,− 0.61) | 0.045 |
| TG 54:6 | − 0.224 (− 0.497,0.05) | 0.204 | − 23.299 (− 51.386,4.789) | 0.097 |
| TG 54:7 | − 0.202 (− 0.579,0.175) | 0.542 | − 11.715 (− 34.376,10.946) | 0.288 |
| TG 56:6 | − 0.27 (− 0.521,− 0.018) | 0.074 | − 29.832 (− 56.908,− 2.756) | 0.033 |
| TG 56:7 | − 0.243 (− 0.505,0.019) | 0.134 | − 31.392 (− 57.644,− 5.14) | 0.022 |
| TG 56:8 | − 0.308 (− 0.545,− 0.07) | 0.028 | − 28.624 (− 56.175,− 1.074) | 0.043 |
| TG 56:9 | − 0.302 (− 0.622,0.019) | 0.126 | − 18.045 (− 41.682,5.592) | 0.125 |
| TG 58:8 | − 0.353 (− 0.664,− 0.043) | 0.056 | − 27.042 (− 47.422,− 6.662) | 0.013 |
| TG 58:9 | − 0.456 (− 0.747,− 0.164) | 0.01 | − 22.52 (− 43.147,− 1.892) | 0.034 |
| TG 58:10 | − 0.311 (− 0.58,− 0.041) | 0.054 | − 20.887 (− 47.51,5.735) | 0.115 |
DG: diacylglycerols, DHA: docosahexaenoic acid, LPC: lyso-phosphatidylcholine, LPE: lyso-phosphatidylethanolamine, PC: phosphatidylcholine, PE: phosphatidylethanolamine, PE-P: phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogen, TG: triacylglycerol.
aMyo-inositol response represents the relative amount of 13C-DHA lipid in placental explants treated with myo-inositol (60 µmol/L) compared with control explants from the same placenta not treated with myo-inositol. (A) Linear regression was run with myo-inositol response (log2-fold-change) as the outcome and basal lipid processing (calculated by the formula (13C-DHA/(13C-DHA + 12C-DHA)) Z-score, log2 transformed) as the predictor variable. Basal lipid processing capacity was measured in control explants with no additional myo-inositol. (B) Linear regression was run with birthweight centile as the outcome and myo-inositol response as the predictor variable. Birthweight centile was standardized for sex and gestational age using local references[65,66]. The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method was used to correct for multiple testing.
Figure 4The association of myo-inositol response with birthweight centile. Linear regression was run with birthweight centile as the outcome and myo-inositol response as the predictor variable. Myo-inositol response (log2-fold-change) represents the relative amount of 13C-DHA lipid in placental explants treated with myo-inositol (60 µmol/L) compared with control explants from the same placenta not treated with myo-inositol. Birthweight centile was standardized for sex and gestational age using local references[65,66]. The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method was used to correct for multiple testing. Solid lines show statistically significant associations while dashed lines show non-significant trends. Shaded areas show 95% confidence intervals. Black: Normal BMI (< 23 kg/m2), Blue: overweight (BMI 23 to < 27.5 kg/m2), Pink: obese (BMI ≥ 27.5 kg/m2).
Clinical characteristics of study population.
| Mean (SD) or n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | 33.4 (2.9) |
| Chinese:Indian ethnicity | 65%:35% |
| Maternal BMI in first trimester (kg/m2) | 25.4 (4.6) |
| Fasting glycemia (mmol/L) | 4.5 (0.5) |
| 1 h glycemia (mmol/L)a | 9.0 (1.7) |
| 2 h glycemia (mmol/L)a | 7.6 (1.6) |
| Mean (SD) or n (%) | |
| Gestational age at birth (days) | 271.4 (5.9) |
| Female neonates | 52% |
| Birthweight (g) | 3276 (323) |
| Birthweight centile (%)b | 61 (30) |
aIn mid-gestation following 75 g OGTT.
bStandardized for sex and gestational age using local references[65,66].