Literature DB >> 36043315

Comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope-assisted insertion versus standard blind technique for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Ji Young Yoo1, Hyun Jeong Kwak2, Eun Ji Ha1, Sang Kee Min1, Jong Yeop Kim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2022        PMID： 36043315      PMCID： PMC9329548          DOI： 10.11622/smedj.2022080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN： 0037-5675            Impact factor:   3.331


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  F S Xue; P Mao; H P Liu; Q Y Yang; C W Li; N He; Y C Xu; X Liao
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  'Failed supraglottic airway': an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  A A J Van Zundert; S P Gatt; C M Kumar; T C R V Van Zundert; J J Pandit
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  C Keller; J Brimacombe
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Influence of head and neck position on cuff position and oropharyngeal sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in children.

Authors:  K Okuda; G Inagawa; T Miwa; K Hiroki
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  The safety and efficacy of the use of the flexible laryngeal mask airway with positive pressure ventilation in elective ENT surgery: a 15-year retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Vladimir Nekhendzy; Vijay K Ramaiah; Jeremy Collins; Hendrikus J Lemmens; Sam P Most
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement: blind insertion versus direct visual epiglottoscopy.

Authors:  Robert L Campbell; Charles Biddle; Nabeel Assudmi; Jeffery R Campbell; Melissa Hotchkiss
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.

Authors:  Go Wun Kim; Jong Yeop Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Yeo Rae Moon; Eun Jeong Park; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  The use of flexible laryngeal mask airway for Adenoidectomies: An experience of 814Paediatric patients.

Authors:  Ozlem Ozmete; Mesut Sener; Esra Caliskan; Meltem Kipri; Anis Aribogan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Comparison of videolaryngoscope-guided versus standard digital insertion techniques of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ulku Ozgul; Feray Akgul Erdil; Mehmet Ali Erdogan; Zekine Begec; Cemil Colak; Aytac Yucel; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  The case for a 3rd generation supraglottic airway device facilitating direct vision placement.

Authors:  André A J Van Zundert; Chandra M Kumar; Tom C R V Van Zundert; Stephen P Gatt; Jaideep J Pandit
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.502
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.