Literature DB >> 11575387

Influence of head and neck position on cuff position and oropharyngeal sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in children.

K Okuda1, G Inagawa, T Miwa, K Hiroki.   

Abstract

We studied how head and neck position affect the cuff position and oropharyngeal sealing pressures of the laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) in children. We studied 39 non-paralyzed healthy children aged 1.5-8.0 yr, weighing 10.3-27.0 kg, managed with size 2 or 2.5 LMAs during elective surgery. Head and neck movements did not adversely affect airway patency in 97% of patients. One child developed apparent airway obstruction with head and neck flexion, which was relieved in the neutral position. Oropharyngeal sealing pressure was significantly greater during neck flexion compared with the neutral position (P<0.02). Fibreoptic examination revealed that the epiglottis covered a larger area of the LMA aperture during neck flexion, compared with the neutral position (P<0.02).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11575387     DOI: 10.1093/bja/86.1.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  Laryngeal Mask Airway Anaesthesia in Hypotonic Cases with Expected Difficult Intubation.

Authors:  Onur Palabıyık
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-08-01

2.  Comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope-assisted insertion versus standard blind technique for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Eun Ji Ha; Sang Kee Min; Jong Yeop Kim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.331

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Ventilation in Otologic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Feihong Liu; Chunhua Xi; Xu Cui; Guyan Wang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.

Authors:  Gulay Erdogan Kayhan; Zekine Begec; Mukadder Sanli; Ender Gedik; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-22

5.  Comparison of effects of ProSeal LMA™ laryngeal mask airway cuff inflation with air, oxygen, air:oxygen mixture and oxygen:nitrous oxide mixture in adults: A randomised, double-blind study.

Authors:  Mona Sharma; Renu Sinha; Anjan Trikha; Rashmi Ramachandran; C Chandralekha
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-08

6.  Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gargi Banerjee; Divya Jain; Indu Bala; Komal Gandhi; Ram Samujh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-02

7.  Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Swati Gupta; Neelam Dogra; Kanchan Chauhan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Reply: Only with an optimal position of the supraglottic airway in situ, valid conclusions can be drawn about oropharyngeal airway pressure.

Authors:  Divya Jain; Komal Gandhi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-03

9.  Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jin Ha Park; Ki-Young Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Hwan Ho Jung; Ji-Ho Kim; Bora Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGainTM versus i-gelTM in anesthetized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Seungpyo Nam; Young-Eun Jang; Eun-Hee Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-04-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.