Literature DB >> 18699873

The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

F S Xue1, P Mao, H P Liu, Q Y Yang, C W Li, N He, Y C Xu, X Liao.   

Abstract

This prospective self-controlled study was designed to evaluate the influences of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation, and orogastric tube placement through the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (ProSeal LMA) in 80 anaesthetised, paralysed adult patients. After the ProSeal LMA was inserted and the cuff pressure was set at 5.9 kPa, ventilation quality, airway seal pressure, fibreoptic positions of the cuff and the drainage tube, orogastric tube placement and efficacy of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) were assessed in two randomly selected positions: neutral and flexed position. When compared to the neutral head position, the head flexed significantly improved the airway seal pressure and the quality of ventilation of the ProSeal LMA (p < 0.05). Fibreoptic scores of the cuff position did not correlate with either the ability to obtain excellent or adequate ventilation through the ProSeal LMA or the ability to generate an airway seal pressure of >or= 2 kPa. Orogastric tube placement via the drainage tube was successful on the first attempt in all patients in the neutral position compared with seven failures following three attempts in the flexed position (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two head positions in the volume of air required to obtain an intracuff pressure of 5.9 kPa, fibreoptic score of the drainage tube position, and expiratory tidal volume and peak inspiratory pressure during IPPV (p > 0.05). In conclusion, head flexion improves airway seal and ventilation quality of the ProSeal LMA. However, placement of an orogastric tube via the drainage tube is impaired in the flexed position compared to the neutral position. Fibreoptic scoring of the ProSeal cuff position is not an accurate test to assess the airway seal and ventilation function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18699873     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05490.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  8 in total

1.  Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  Andreas Biedler; Marc Wrobel; Sven Schneider; Stefan Soltész; Stephan Ziegeler; Ulrich Grundmann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope-assisted insertion versus standard blind technique for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Hyun Jeong Kwak; Eun Ji Ha; Sang Kee Min; Jong Yeop Kim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 3.  Controversies in Pediatric Perioperative Airways.

Authors:  Jozef Klučka; Petr Štourač; Roman Štoudek; Michaela Ťoukálková; Hana Harazim; Martina Kosinová
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gargi Banerjee; Divya Jain; Indu Bala; Komal Gandhi; Ram Samujh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-02

5.  Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Swati Gupta; Neelam Dogra; Kanchan Chauhan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.

Authors:  Go Wun Kim; Jong Yeop Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Yeo Rae Moon; Eun Jeong Park; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jin Ha Park; Ki-Young Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Hwan Ho Jung; Ji-Ho Kim; Bora Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGainTM versus i-gelTM in anesthetized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Seungpyo Nam; Young-Eun Jang; Eun-Hee Kim; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-04-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.