| Literature DB >> 36042899 |
Neda Milinković1, Milica Zeković2, Margarita Dodevska3, Brižita Đorđević4, Branimir Radosavljević5, Svetlana Ignjatović1, Nevena Ivanović4.
Abstract
Background: Literature data indicate the benefit of magnesium (Mg) supplementation. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of short-term Mg supplementation on iron status in healthy female participants.Entities:
Keywords: female; iron status; magnesium; students; supplementation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36042899 PMCID: PMC9375532 DOI: 10.5937/jomb0-33898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Biochem ISSN: 1452-8266 Impact factor: 2.157
Baseline participant characteristics (N=46).
aMean±SD, the standard deviation for normal distribution
bMedian (IQR); IQR, interquartile range (quartile3-quartile1) for not normally distribution WBC, white blood cells (Leucocytes); RBC, red blood cells; tHgb, haemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; MCV, mean cell volume; MCH, mean haemoglobin concentration; MCHC, amount of haemoglobin per unit volume in a single red blood cell; Fe, iron; UIBC, unsaturated iron-binding capacity; TIBC, total iron-binding capacity; SAT, total transferrin saturation
| Parameters | Mean±SDa Median (IQR)b |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 23 (2) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 21.8 (2.8) |
| Total body fat, % | 25.49±4.85 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 113.8±10.6 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 80.3±8.6 |
| WBC, 109/L | 7.29±1.13 |
| Lymphocytes, % | 33.5±5.7 |
| Monocytes, % | 6.0±1.6 |
| Granulocytes, % | 60.4±5.9 |
| Lymphocytes, # | 2.4±0.5 |
| Monocytes, # | 0.4 (0.1) |
| Granulocytes, # | 4.4±0.9 |
| RBC, 1012/L | 4.51±0.28 |
| tHgb, g/L | 140 (4) |
| Hct, L/L | 0.439±0.029 |
| MCV, fL | 89.6±4.2 |
| MCH, pg | 29.9±1.7 |
| MCHC, g/L | 334±7 |
| RDW, % | 14.5±1.7 |
| iMg, mmol/L | 0.59±0.032 |
| tMg, mmol/L | 0.89±0.054 |
| Fe, μmol/L | 14.89±5.65 |
| UIBC, μmol/L | 51.8±13.8 |
| TIBC, μmol/L | 66.7±12.5 |
| SAT, % | 23.9±9.8 |
| Transferrin, g/L | 2.6 (0.7) |
| MetHgb, % | 0.4 (0.15) |
| COHgb, % | 3.66±2.02 |
| O2Hgb, % | 40.6±19.7 |
Daily energy and nutrient intakes among study participants assessed by the average of dietary recalls for two consecutive days at baseline evaluation (t0) and after 11 days (t2) of using provided dietary supplements.
%TEI, percentage of total energy intake; p < 0.05 – statistically significant difference between t0 and t2 within the same intervention group.
aMean±SD, the standard deviation for normal distribution
| Intervention Group (N=46) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy/Nutrients | t0 | t2 | P |
| Energy (kcal) | 1733.6±550.6 | 1804.9±485.6 | 0.501 |
| Carbohydrates (TEI%) | 29.9±9.8 | 28.6±7.8 | 0.516 |
| Proteins (%TEI) | 10.5±3.9 | 11.7±3.3 | 0.066 |
| Fats (%TEI) | 29.0±13.1 | 31.9±13.1 | 0.283 |
| Fe (mg) | 7.8±3.3 | 8.6±3.0 | 0.177 |
| Mg (mg) | 236.2±85.1 | 230.8±74.1 | 0.741 |
| Zn (mg) | 7.3±3.3 | 8.4±3.2 | 0.052 |
| Folic acid (μg) | 189.2±96.6 | 210.9±78.2 | 0.269 |
| Vitamin B12 (μg) | 2.5±1.3 | 2.6±1.2 | 0.053 |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 61.5±7.3 | 68.9±6.0 | 0.631 |
Daily intake levels presented as the median levels and 5th and 95th percentiles of eight food groups and their corresponding contributions to daily iron intake based on repeated 24 h dietary recalls among study participants.
| Food groups | Intake of the food group<br>(mg/day) | The average contribution<br>to the total iron intake<br>(10.52 mg/day) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 5th<br>percentile | 95th<br>percentile | % | Iron intake<br>(mg/day) | |
| Milk and dairy products | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.44 | 2.25 | 0.24 |
| Eggs and egg products | 0.63 | 0.15 | 3.34 | 8.01 | 0.84 |
| Meat and meat products | 1.64 | 0.38 | 5.92 | 22.28 | 2.34 |
| Grains and cereal products | 2.28 | 0.71 | 5.60 | 28.57 | 3.00 |
| Nuts and seeds | 0.42 | 0.03 | 2.24 | 6.94 | 0.73 |
| Vegetables and vegetable products | 1.29 | 0.14 | 4.03 | 15.67 | 1.65 |
| Fruit and fruit products | 0.51 | 0.04 | 1.54 | 4.84 | 0.51 |
| Sugar and confectionary products | 0.21 | 0.01 | 1.95 | 4.37 | 0.46 |
Figure 1Interdependence between serum total magnesium (tMg) with serum iron (Fe),unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC), total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and transferrin saturation (SAT) at the beginning (A) and after 11 days (B) of supplementary intervention.
Figure 2Interdependence between serum ionized magnesium (iMg) with serum iron (Fe), hematocrit (Hct), transferrin and transferrin saturation (SAT) at the beginning (A) and after 11 days (B) of supplementary intervention.
Figure 3Principal Component Analysis for serum iron (Fe) and serum magnesum (Mg) (as total (tMg), ionized (iMg) and iMg/Mg) and biochemical parameters (unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC), total iron binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin, transferrin saturation (SAT), total haemoglobin (tHgb), MetHgb and hematocrit (Hct)) content at the beginning (A, t0) and after 11 days (B, t2) of supplementary intervention.
Associations between estimated O2Hgb and tertiles of whole blood ionized Mg at the eleventh day.
p < 0.05 – a statistically significant difference for trend
T, tertil; O2Hgb, oxy-haemoglobin; N, number of participants
| Whole blood ionized Mg on the eleventh day | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biochemical<br>parameter | T1 (N=17)<br><0.59 | T2 (N=16)<br>0.60–0.63 | T3 (N=13)<br>0.64–0.68 | P for trend |
| O2Hgb (%) | 49.9<br>(38.7–61.1) | 41.3<br>(29.4–53.2) | 27.3<br>(20.9–33.7) | 0.029 |