Literature DB >> 36037175

Sleeping duration, physical activity, alcohol drinking and other risk factors as potential attributes of metabolic syndrome in adults in Ethiopia: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Mulugeta Belayneh1, Tefera Chane Mekonnen2, Sisay Eshete Tadesse2, Erkihun Tadesse Amsalu3, Fentaw Tadese3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Available evidence showed that metabolic syndrome in the adult population is persistently elevated due to nutrition transition, genetic predisposition, individual-related lifestyle factors, and other environmental risks. However, in developing nations, the burden and scientific evidence on the pattern, and risk exposures for the development of the metabolic syndrome were not adequately investigated. Thus, the study aimed to measure the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and to identify specific risk factors among adult populations who visited Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.
METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 419 adults attending Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from January 25 to February 29, 2020. We used the WHO STEP-wise approach for non-communicable disease surveillance to assess participants' disease condition. Metabolic syndrome was measured using the harmonized criteria recommended by the International Diabetes Federation Task Force in 2009. Data were explored for missing values, outliers and multicollinearity before presenting the summary statistics and regression results. Multivariable logistic regression was used to disentangle statistically significant predictors of metabolic syndrome expressed using an odds ratio with a 95% of uncertainty interval. All statistical tests were managed using SPSS version 26. A non-linear dose-response analysis was performed to show the relationships between metabolic syndromes with potential risk factors.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults was 35.0% (95% CI, (30.5, 39.8)). Women were more affected than men (i.e. 40.3% vs 29.4%). After adjusting for other variables, being female [OR = 1.85; 95% CI (1.01, 3.38)], urban residence [OR = 1.94; 95% CI (1.08, 3.24)], increased age [OR = 18.23; 95% CI (6.66, 49.84)], shorter sleeping durations [OR = 4.62; 95% CI (1.02, 20.98)], sedentary behaviour [OR = 4.05; 95% CI (1.80, 9.11)], obesity [OR = 3.14; 95% CI (1.20, 8.18)] and alcohol drinking [OR = 2.85; 95% CI (1.27,6.39)] were positively associated with the adult metabolic syndrome. Whilst have no formal education [OR = 0.30; 95% CI (0.12, 0.74)] was negatively associated with metabolic syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of adult metabolic syndrome is found to be high. Metabolic syndrome has linear relationships with BMI, physical activity, sleep duration, and level of education. The demographic and behavioural factors are strongly related with the risk of metabolic syndrome. Since most of the factors are modifiable, there should be urgent large-scale community intervention programs focusing on increased physical activity, healthy sleep, weight management, minimize behavioural risk factors, and healthier food interventions targeting a lifecycle approach. The existing policy should be evaluated whether due attention has given to prevention strategies of NCDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36037175      PMCID: PMC9423638          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is defined by a constellation of interconnected factors that directly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and all-cause mortality [1]. Among other etiologies of MetS insulin resistance and visceral adiposity are highly responsible for chronic inflammation process characterized by the production of abnormal adipocytokines including tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, leptin, and adiponectin. The interaction between components of the clinical phenotype of the syndrome with its biological phenotype contributes to the development of a pro-inflammatory state and further a chronic, subclinical vascular inflammation which modulates and results in atherosclerotic processes [2-5]. MetS is present if three or more of the following five criteria are met: waist circumference(WC) > 83.7 cm for males and ≥ 78.0 cm for females [6]; fasting blood glucose(FBG) ≥100 mg/dL (5.5 mmol/L) or treatment with hypoglycaemic agents or insulin; systolic blood pressure ≥130 or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mm Hg or antihypertensive drug treatment; serum triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) or treatment for hypertriglyceridemia and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C)<40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) for men or <50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) in women [7]. However, in 2009 the International Diabetic Federation (IDF) Task Force revised above criteria to diagnosis MetS by including central obesity (defined when WC >94 cm for men and >80 cm for women) plus any two of the remaining four criteria listed above. The current study used this harmonized definition made to assess MetS [7–11, 25]. Against this backdrop, MetS is being considered a rising public health issue globally, which ranges from 10% to 50% [6, 10]. While in Africa the prevalence ranged from 17% to 25% [12]. Ethiopia ranked among the top four countries of 15 Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa countries in terms of mortality and disability-adjusted life-years based on the age-standardized proportion of disease attributable to dietary and metabolic risks. Adults with MetS are twice as likely to die and three times as likely to have a heart attack or stroke compared with people without MetS; and different articles suggest that three up to five folds greater risk of developing type II diabetes [13-17]. MetS has an association with sudden cardiac death [7] and it is not only increasing the risk of developing non-communicable diseases (NCDs); but also increases the cost of treatment for NCDs. It has been estimated that the economic burden of hypertension and other NCDs increases from 59% to 179% by 2020 [18]. NCDs are increasingly affecting low- and middle-income countries [19]. Previous studies conducted in Ethiopia have documented a high prevalence of MetS [14, 20]. Several recent reports show that consumption of atherogenic diet, sedentary lifestyle, and tobacco consumption, physical inactivity, aging, and hormonal imbalance are considered as potential risk factors for MetS [21, 22]. Recently, this syndrome has also been noted to be associated with a state of chronic, low-grade inflammation [22]. Lifestyle interventions are recommended as the initial therapies for the treatment of MetS [22]. In Ethiopia, evidence on the magnitude and risks of exposures were not inclusive and are very limited. The current study differed from former studies in use of diagnosis criteria for MetS (both of them used the National Cholesterol education program III) [14, 20], variations in target population [21] and they didn’t address lifestyle factors inclusively. The way they measured physical activity and other composite variables are not clear. However, we tried to additionally assess dietary habits, sleep duration, and substance use that may lead to MetS. The present study aimed to address the prevalence of MetS and associated factors among adults in DCSH, Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study setting and design

The study employed a hospital-based cross-sectional study at Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital (DCSH) from January 25 to February 2020. The hospital is 401 km far away from the capital city, Addis Ababa to the northeast direction, located at the Center of Dessie city and is one of the frontline government hospitals in Ethiopia. It provides diversified referral services (but not limited comprehensive obstetric, general surgery, orthopaedics, chemotherapy, neurological internal medicine and psychiatric services) for more than 7 million populations from eastern Amhara and Afar regions. It is staffed with more than 800 healthcare and administrative workers. More than 300,000 patients visit the hospital annually. Adults whose ages greater than eighteen years and attending outpatient departments (OPDs) in DCSH were the target population. All adult patients attending the OPDs at DCSH after eight hours of fasting were included in the study but all pregnant mothers were excluded from the study. We determined the total samples of 419 adults to be included in the study by considering the prevalence of MetS in Gondar, Ethiopia [13] as 45.3%, and 10% of non-response rate. Patients who were identified as fasting for the last eight hours were marked by the red colour on their card from triage. Sampling frame was prepared using identity card number for subjects whose card was labelled with red colour on daily basis until reaching the required sample. We applied a simple random sampling technique to catch-up on study subjects. All of the methods were performed in accordance with the guideline of STROBE checklist.

Data measurement

Participants were interviewed in face-to-face manner using the modified WHO Stepwise approach for the surveillance of NCDs structured questionnaire [23]. This approach is designed to explicitly assess the risk factors of NCDs in the scope of socio-demographic, economic, medical history, biochemical, physical measurements, and lifestyle factors including dietary habits, physical activity, and substance use. Anthropometric measurements and blood sample collection were taken by six nurses and one laboratory technologist after training was given. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by using a digital measuring device with sitting, after resting for at least 15 minutes. The measurements were taken on the left arm after removing or rolling up clothing with the palm facing upward using appropriate cuff size, with the position the cuff above the elbow and lower band is positioned 1–2 cm above the elbow joint. BP measurements were taken times with at least 3minute intervals between consecutive measurements. The mean systolic and diastolic BP from the second and third recording was analysed and documented as elevated BP when greater or equal to 130/85 mm Hg [24]. Weight and height were measured using the electronic weighing and height scales with regular monitoring and adjustment of the beam-balance. Height and weight were recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg respectively [24]. Body Mass Index (BMI) was categorized using optimal cut-off for obesity validated in Ethiopia that classifies adults as underweight/thin when the respondent’s BMI ≤ 18.3 for males and <21.9 for females, as normal if the BMI was between 18.3–21.5 kg/m2 for males and 21.9–23.0 kg/m2 for females, as overweight if the BMI lied between 21.6–22.2 kg/m2 for males and 23.1–24.5 kg/m2 for females and as obese if the BMI was ≥22.2 k/m2 for males and >24.5 kg/m2 for females [6]. For measuring participants’ waist circumference (WC), we used a simple flexible steel metric tape. According to WHO, central obesity was defined when WC for men and women was greater than 94 cm and 80cm respectively [25]. Blood sample collections were taken from the study subjects who attended clinical follow-up in DCSH by the laboratory technician. Five mL of blood specimen was collected from every participant to analyse participants’ fasting blood sugar (FBS) and lipid profiles in the clinical chemistry laboratory using DIRUI CS-T240 automated chemistry analyzer. Triglyceride (TG) concentration was measured by standard enzymatic assays using glycerol phosphate oxidase method and defined as elevated when ≥ 1.7 mmol/l (150 mg/dl) for fasting samples [26]. HDL cholesterol was determined after sample pre-treatment with a precipitating reagent and centrifugation. The participants were categorized as having low HDL when it was below 40mg/dl and 50mg/dl for men and women respectively. Participants’ FBS was determined using the glucose oxidase method within 30’ minutes after collection of the blood samples and diagnosed as having diabetes when FBS was ≥100 mg/dl [23]. Familial histories of cardio-metabolic diseases from biologically related first-degree relatives were assessed through recalling of the participants and referring the physician records [27]. Physical activity was measured using the General Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) which recommended in the Ethiopian context. Physical inactivity was defined as those who had low levels of physical activity [28, 41]. The level of alcohol consumption was categorized as current alcohol users if the study participants took alcoholic drinks within 30 days preceding the study; as moderate drinkers when participants consumed standard of two drinks on a single occasion for men, one drinks on a single occasion for women and as heavy drinkers if participants consumed standard of five or more drinks on a single occasion or twenty or more drinks per week for men, four or more drinks on a single occasion or fifteen or more drinks per week for women [23]. Likewise, the participants’ exposure levels for cigarette smoking were labelled as tobacco users if a person who was either a smoker or a smokeless tobacco user, or both and as smoker if someone who, at the time of the survey, smoked any tobacco product either daily or occasionally. Smokers may be further divided into two categories: i) daily smoker if someone who smoked any tobacco product at least once a day (with the exception that people who smoke every day, but not on days of religious fasting, were still classified as daily smokers) and ii) occasional smoker when someone who smoked, but not every day [29]. The dietary risk of participants for MetS was assessed using food frequency questionnaire that includes nine food groups [30]. Fruit and vegetable consumption was also assessed using questions like ‘How many servings of fruit do you eat on a typical day?’ and ‘How many servings of vegetables do you eat on a typical day?’ using 24-hour dietary recall data [28]. The WHO recommends an individual intake of at least 400g of fruits and vegetables a day, the equivalent of five servings, which was used as the cut-off for low fruit and vegetable consumption [31]. Sleep duration was assessed by the question: “In the past year, on average, how many hours/minutes of sleep (including day time naps) did you take per day?” with the following category responses: < 6 hrs, 6 to7 hrs, 8 to 9 hrs, and ≥10 hrs [32]. Although there is no common consensus on the optimal duration of sleep, some studies used the above groupings. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention advises that healthy sleep varies by sex and age. The recommended sleep duration ranges 6 hrs. to 9 hrs for adults as defined by National Sleep Foundation of America [33].

Data analysis

After checking the completeness of the questionnaire, the data were coded and entered into Epi-Data version 4.6.0.2 then exported to SPSS version 25 for further analyses. Frequencies, percentage, mean and standard deviation were computed. Those variables with p-value less than 0.2 in the bivariable analysis were exported to the final model. Then multivariable logistic regression was performed and variables with a p-value ≤ of 0.05 were considered as significant factors and present using adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 95% CI. Model fitness was checked by Hosmer-Lemeshow test (0.970). Scatter plot was demonstrated to show the dose-response relationship (non-linear exposure variables) between MetS and physical activity, sleep duration, BMI and Educational level after logarithmic transformation of their corresponding Odds ratio. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research and Ethical Review Committee of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University. For any of the eligible study participants, the purpose, benefits, and right of withdrawal or stop filling the questionnaire were described and discussed.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 408 study subjects were involved in the study with a response rate of 97.37%. Among them, 211(51.7%) were females. The mean age of the participants was 44.74 (±15.67 of SD) years and about one-fifth of the participants, 94(23.0%), were in the age range of 18–29 years (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics among adult patients in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital outpatient departments Dessie, Ethiopia May 2020.

VariablesFrequencyPercentage
Sex Female21151.7
Male19748.3
Age group (in years) 18–299423.0
30–398019.6
40–498320.3
50–597317.9
≥607819.2
Mean age (±SD)44.74(±15.67)
Ethnicity Amhara29171.3
Oromo489.3
Tigrie3811.8
Afar317.6
Religion Muslim19347.3
Protestant338.1
Orthodox18244.6
Educational status No formal schooling6716.4
High school and less16741.0
College and above17442.6
Marital status Widowed4210.3
Married16941.4
Separated286.9
Divorced4511.0
Single12430.4
Resident Urban27767.9
Rural13132.1
Monthly Income(in ETB) <20007919.4
2000–400013633.3
≥400019347.3

ETB: Ethiopian birr

ETB: Ethiopian birr

Medical and behavioural characteristics

From the total number of study participants, seventy-two (17.65%) participants had a family history of cardio-metabolic diseases, of which 33 (45.83%) of them had current MetS. Among a total of respondents, 208 (51%) of them were consuming coffee and 72 (34.6%) of them had MetS as diagnosed with the current criteria. The majority of study participants, 262(64.2%) were not involved in high level, or moderate physical activity (Table 2).
Table 2

Behavioural risk factors among adult patients in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital outpatient departments Dessie, Ethiopia 2020.

VariablesFrequency (%)MetS
Yes (%)No (%)
Family history of CVDs
    Yes72(16.65)33(45.83)39(54.17)
    No336(83.35)110(32.7)226(67.3)
Current SmokerYes48 (11.8)17 (35.4)31 (64.6)
No360 (88.2)126 (35)234 (65)
Ever SmokerYes58(14.2)22(37.9)36(62.1)
No350(85.8)121(34.6)229(65.4)
Frequency of smokingDaily37 (9.1)13 (35.1)24 (64.9)
Occasionally11 (2.7)4 (36.4)7 (63.6)
Non smoker360 (88.2)126 (35.0)234 (65.0)
Current alcohol userYes54 (13.2)25 (46.3)29 (53.7)
No354 (86.8)118 (33.3)236 (66.7)
Type of drinkerHeavy drinkers30 (7.4)14 (46.7)16 (53.3)
Moderate drinkers21 (5.1)10 (47.6)11 (52.4)
No drinkers357 (87.5)119 (33.3)238 (66.7)
Coffee ConsumptionYes208 (51.0)72 (34.6)136 (65.4)
No200 (49.0)71 (35.5)129 (64.5)
Frequency of coffee consumptionnon consumers200 (49.0)71 (35.5)129 (64.5)
irregular consumer39 (9.6)16 (41)23 (59)
exactly once a day69 (16.9)26 (37.7)43 (62.3)
more than once a day100 (24.5)30 (30)70 (70)
Khat chewingYes54(13.2)17(31.5)37(68.5)
No354(86.8)83(23.4)271(76.6)
Physical activityLow physical activity262 (64.2)118 (45.0)144 (55.0)
Moderate Physical Activity40 (9.8)11 (27.5)29 (72.5)
High level Physical Activity106 (26.0)14 (13.2)92 (86.8)
Spend of leisure timeReading, watching TV, or other sedentary activity272 (66.7)99 (36.4)173 (63.6)
Walking, cycling97 (23.8)35 (36.1)62 (63.9)
Participation in recreational sports39 (9.5)9 (23.1)30 (76.9)
Sleeping duration(in hours)Less than six15(3.7)12(80)3(20)
Six to seven53(13)24(45.3)29(54.7)
Eight to nine266(65.2)84(31.6)182(68.4)
Ten and above74(18.1)23(31.1)51(68.9)

Dietary habits and nutritional status

A higher percentage of the sample, 361 (88.5%) took insufficient fruits and vegetables. The highest number of study participants, 244(59.8%) used vegetable oil for food preparation. From a total of study subjects, 165 (40.4%) were taken sugar and sweet daily more than one-third of them 61 (37.0%) have MetS (Table 3). Around one-fifth of the study subjects, 83 (20.34%) were overweight while 33(8.3%) of the participants were obese. The mean BMI was 23.185±3.3195 kg/m2.
Table 3

Dietary risk factors among adult patients in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital outpatient departments Dessie, Ethiopia June 2020.

VariablesFrequency (%)MetS
Yes (%)No (%)
Regular Meal patterns        Breakfast and Dinner only3(0.7)1(33.3)2 (66.7)
315(77.2)106(33.7)209(66.3)
    Breakfast, lunch and dinner
90(21.1)36(40)54(60)
Breakfast, lunch, Snack and dinner
Meal plan    Yes39(9.6)13(33.3)26(66.7)
        No369(90.4)130(35.2)239(64.8)
Eating styles of participants    Erratic eater            Time constraint277(67.9)95(65.7)182(34.3)
131(32.1)48(36.6)83(63.4)
Servings of Fruit and/or vegetables per dayLess than five361 (88.5)131 (36.3)230 (63.7)
Five and above47 (11.5)12 (25.5)35 (74.5)
Oil or fat most often usedMixed42 (10.3)15 (35.7)27 (64.3)
Palm oil122 (29.9)38 (31.1)84 (68.9)
Vegetable oil244 (59.8)90 (36.9)154 (63.1)
Sugar and sweetDaily165 (40.4)61 (37.0)104 (63.0)
Occasionally218 (53.5)71 (32.6)147 (67.4)
Don’t take25 (6.1)11 (44.0)14 (56.0)
EggDaily49 (12.0)14(28.6)35 (71.4)
Occasionally340 (83.3)125 (36.8)215 (63.2)
Don’t take19 (4.7)4 (21.1)15 (78.9)
Red meatDaily48 (11.8)16 (33.3)32 (66.7)
Occasionally317 (77.7)109 (34.4)208 (65.6)
Don’t take43 (10.5)18 (41.9)25 (58.1)
Consumption outside home (café, restaurant or hotel)≥4 times per week42(11.8)19(45.2)23(54.8)
2–3 times per week8(2.5)4(50)4(50)
1time per week27(6.6)10(37)17(63)
Only at home331(81.1)110(33.2)221(66.8)
Sugar & Sweet food intakeDaily165(40.4)62(37.6)103(62.4)
Occasionally208(50.9)65(32.1)143(67.9)
Don’t Take35(9.7)16(44)19(56)
Fried foodDaily44 (10.8)16 (36.4)28 (63.6)
Occasionally313 (76.7)107 (34.2)206 (65.8)
Don’t take51 (12.5)20 (39.2)31 (60.8)
Adult BMI categoryObese33(8.2)18(54.5)15(45.5)
Overweight83(20.3)45(54.2)38(45.8)
Normal249(61)64(25.7)185(74.3)
Thin43(10.5)16(37.2)27(62.8)

Metabolic syndrome

The proportion of MetS among adults who attended DCSH was 35.0%[95% CI, (30.5, 39.5)] as measured by the 2009 harmonized definition. It was more common among women than men (40.3% vs 29.4%; p<0.023). Women had a higher percentage of reduced HDL than men (20.4% vs 11.2%; P<0.014) but no significant gender differences were observed with elevated blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, triglyceride and obesity. The most frequent MetS parameters were central obesity (40.44%); elevated TGs (40.19%) and hyperglycaemia (29.91%) followed by hypertension (29.65%) and decreased HDL-C (15.93% (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Components of metabolic syndrome among adults in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital outpatient departments Dessie, Ethiopia 2020.

Factors associated with MetS

In the adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis, MetS among the study subjects was significantly associated with their socio-demographic features (sex, age, education, and place of residence), behavioural factors (current alcohol consumption, physical activity level, and sleeping duration) and current body mass index of the participants were found be independent predictors (Table 4).
Table 4

Factors associated with metabolic syndrome among adult patients in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital outpatient departments Dessie, Ethiopia 2020.

VariablesMetSCOR(95%CI)AOR(95%CI)
Yes(%)No(%)
SexFemale85(40.3)126(59.7)1.67(1.07,2.44)1.85(1.01,3.38)*
Male58(29.4)139(70.6)11
Age in years18–2914(14.9)80(85.1)11
30–3916(20.0)64(80.0)1.43(0.75,2.60)2.26 (0.83, 6.13)
40–4930(36.2)53(63.8)3.23(1.81,6.27)9.81 (3.73, 25.83)***
50–5944(60.3)29(39.7)2.26(1.08,4.70)39.67 (13.84, 113.6)***
≥6039(50.0)39(50.0)6.53(3.35,12.72)18.23(6.66, 49.84)***
Educational statusNo formal education14(20.9)53(79.1)0.36(0.14,0.73)0.30(0.12,0.74)**
High school and less56(43.5)111(66.5)0.69(0.35,0.89)0.68(0.38,1.25)
College and above73(42.0)101(58.0)11
ResidentUrban110(39.7)167(60.3)1.96(1.23,3.11)1.94(1.08,3.24)*
Rural33(25.2)98(74.8)11
Physical activityLow118(45.0)144(55.0)5.38(2.92,9.94)4.05 (1.80, 9.11)**
Moderate11(27.5)29(72.5)2.49(1.02,6.08)2.59 (0.84, 8.02)
High14(18.6)92(81.4)11
BMIObese18(54.5)15(45.5)3.47(1.65,7.28)3.14 (1.20, 8.18)*
Overweight45(54.2)38(45.8)3.42(2.04,5.74)2.04 (1.05,3.95)*
Underweight16(37.3)27(62.7)1.71(.87,3.38)2.30 (0.95, 5.59)
Normal64(25.8)185(74.2)11
Current alcohol drunkerYes25(46.3)29(53.7)1.72(1.02, 3.08)2.85(1.27,6.39)*
No118(33.3)236(66.7)11
Consumption of fruits and vegetables per weekLess than five times131(36.3)230(63.7)1.66(0.83, 3.31)2.28(0.94, 5.56)
More than five times12(25.5)35(74.5)11
Sleeping duration (in hours)Less than six12(80.0)3(20.0)8.87(2.28,34.47)4.62(1.02, 20.98)*
Six to nine108(33.9)211(66.1)1.83(0.88,3.81)1.26(0.53,2.98)
Ten and above23(31.1)51(68.9)11

NB

*, ** and *** indicate at P-values at <0.05, <0.001 and <0.0001 respectively. The table was adjusted for marital status, family history, smoking, chewing khat, sugar and sweetened food intake, fried food consumption, meal plan and eating style

NB *, ** and *** indicate at P-values at <0.05, <0.001 and <0.0001 respectively. The table was adjusted for marital status, family history, smoking, chewing khat, sugar and sweetened food intake, fried food consumption, meal plan and eating style As age increases the probability of having MetS increases. In the current study, the odds of MetS among aged participants (age ≥60 years) was 18 folds higher than younger individuals (age < 30 years) [OR = 18.23; 95% CI: (6.66, 49.84)]. The odds of MetS among adults with sleeping duration less than six hours per day was about five times higher than the odds of MetS in adults who had a sleeping duration often and more hours per day [OR: 4.62; 95% CI: (1.02, 20.98)]. A dose-response analysis showed MetS had almost linear relationships with the log Odds ratios of sleep duration (Fig 2A), physical activity (Fig 2B), BMI (Fig 2C) and educational level (Fig 2D).
Fig 2

Nonlinear dose-response relationships of metabolic syndrome with a) sleeping duration, b) physical activity, c) BMI, and d) educational level among adults in Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, South Wollo, Ethiopia 2020.

Nonlinear dose-response relationships of metabolic syndrome with a) sleeping duration, b) physical activity, c) BMI, and d) educational level among adults in Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, South Wollo, Ethiopia 2020.

Discussion

To begin with the study’s pertinent findings, more than one-third of adults attending outpatient departments of DCSH in Ethiopia had MetS. Women, older age groups, urban residents and individual with lesser sleep duration, higher BMI, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption and high educational level were disproportionately affected by MetS. The percentage of adults having at least three of the five components of MetS was 35.0%. This finding is similar with a study conducted in Cameroon (32.45%) [34] but higher than studies conducted at St. Paul’s Hospital, Addis Ababa (20.3%) [35], Jimma University Hospital, (26%) [14], Mizan-Aman town, Ethiopia (9.6%), Brazil (8.9%), Canada (19.1%) and Algeria (20%) [20, 36–38] and lower than studies done in University of Gondar hospital, Amhara(45.3%), Ayder Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia (51.1%) and India (76%) [13, 16, 21]. These variations may be due to discrepancies in sample size; variations in existing interventions and available infrastructures, prolonged time gaps between studies, ethnic differences, and application of non-uniform tools to define MetS. Additionally, the possible reason for the higher prevalence of MetS in Brazil, Canada, and Algeria may be due to the difference in availability of effective nutrition policy and awareness level related to treatment and prevention of NCDs. The current finding was supported by a review conducted in developing countries that revealed that rapid urbanization, nutrition transition, sedentary behaviour, and risky personal behaviours attributing for the highest burden of metabolic syndrome [12]. The odds of MetS among adults with low physical activity were four-fold higher compared with adults with high physical activity and in line with studies from Mizan Aman of the southern region, Addis Ababa and Tigray region of Ethiopia, rural northeast China, and Qatar [20, 21, 38–41]. This is underpins that individuals without regular physical activity are at higher risk of elevated BP, insulin resistance, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and obesity due to altered or reduced energy consumption, or positive energy balance [9, 45, 46]. Older adults had a higher probability of getting MetS and age is an independent risk factor for developing hypertension, but the changes in BP associated with aging are more pronounced in women compared to men. As age increases, the percentage of body fat also increases due to a change in body composition [21, 34, 36, 40, 42, 43, 47, 48]. The current study indicated that women were more affected by MetS than men and it was consistent with studies conducted in the United States and Portugal [48, 49] but in contrast to the above findings, some studies revealed that men were commonly presented with MetS [50-52]. This may be due to the presence of distinct differences in the prevalence of dysglycemia, body fat distribution, adipocyte size and function, hormonal regulation of body weight and adiposity, and the influence of oestrogen decline on risk factor clustering [51] and in general, data on differences in metabolic syndrome in men and women is scarce [47]. The current study also identified that no or low educational status reduces the likelihood of having MetS which contradicts to other studies [48, 49, 53]. In the context of the current study, higher clustering of uneducated individuals are found in the rural areas who may not be affected by sedentary behaviour, consumption of energy-dense nutrients, and processed food commodities and may be due to the socio-economic inequalities Furthermore, the current study reaffirmed that obese and overweight individuals were at greater risk of developing MetS. Whatever the study settings, this result was in line with other studies in Ethiopia, Cameroon, South India, Brazil, and Canada [21, 34, 36, 37, 44]. Obesity strongly linked to the alteration of the five diagnostic criteria and plays a crucial role in the development of MetS [9, 14]. Another risk personal behaviour that contributes to the occurrence of MetS in this study was habitual alcohol consumption. The finding was similar to findings conducted in Brazil, Venezuela, and China which showed that moderate to heavy drinking of alcohol leads to MetS [54-56] but other studies from the United States and China revealed that mild to moderate alcohol consumption reduces the risk of MetS [57, 58]. This may be due to the fact that alcohol is a concentrated source of energy and can distort the total energy pool of adults and it may also trigger individuals for aggressive eating conditions following drinking. Additionally, the current study called for intervention to avoid insufficient sleep duration that leads to MetS. The study identified that adults with short sleeping duration (<6 hours/day) were independently associated with MetS which was congruent with many epidemiological studies and Systematic reviews [59, 60] even if the presence of paradoxical reports exist [61]. However, the underlying mechanisms between shorter sleep duration and MetS are not clear or well understood [60]. The potential biological mechanisms how change in circadian rhythm related to the development of MetS and NCDs need further investigation using strong methodological approach. Further experiments should be designed to validate and recommend optimal cut-off for sleep duration for the prevention of NCDs. This study has limitations in assuring the accuracy of some information which are self-reported such as sleeping duration, alcohol consumption, physical activity and dietary habits. Even though detailed questionnaire was used to commemorate their past activities, recall bias is inevitable. The study also didn’t address interrelationships or interaction effects of risky personal behaviour one over the other using causal pathways analysis. The use of standardized tools and laboratory procedures helps in producing reliable estimates and generalizing the findings to the community. Additionally, the referral hospital has been serving the wide catchment areas from Eastern Amhara and Afar regions and the use of similar management protocol for MetS across the nation, the findings of study can be inferred to populations attending OPDs in Ethiopia. Moreover, a more mechanistic longitudinal study is deemed necessary to confirm the relationships of sleep duration and metabolic syndrome to reach definitive conclusion.

Conclusions

This study revealed a growing epidemic burden of MetS in Ethiopia and has become one of the major health challenges worldwide. The substantial gender difference was noted that the overall MetS was almost two folds higher in women than men. The common component of MetS was central obesity followed by elevated triglycerides. In general sleep duration, physical activity, BMI and educational level of participants have linear relationships with MetS. MetS in the general adult population was highly contributed due to rapid urbanization, demographic transition, personal behavioural factors, and nutrition. In the current study personal lifestyle or behavioural factors predominantly contributed to the rapid increment of MetS and should be given due attention for large-scale interventions. The national NCD prevention strategy should be reframed in addressing the modifiable risk factors for such cardiometabolic disease to minimize and avert morbidity and mortality burden at population level. 4 Apr 2022
PONE-D-21-20970
Sleeping Duration, Physical Activity and Alcohol Drinking as Potential Attributes of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults in Ethiopia
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Mekonnen, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Five reviewers have reviewed your paper and made several excellent suggestions for improvement. Please pay specific attention to:
Please submit your revised manuscript by May 19 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Use of the central obesity measure and cut-offs, clarify, and add additional analyses using different cut-offs. Identification of U-shaped relationships should be based on the multivariable analysis. Looking at the adjusted ORs no U-shape relationships were identified though. If there are any U-shape relationships, please present them graphically using log odds or log odds ratio plots for dose - response non-linear continuous exposure. Better describe choice and definition of risk factors, as well provide more details about the study sites. Make sure to adhere to STROBE reporting guidelines for cross-section studies. Also note that reviewer 2 included the review of your paper as a separate Word document. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Bart Ferket Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "NO- The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." At this time, please address the following queries: a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders. d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.” Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: "First, we would like to thank Wollo University for giving opportunity and over all support to do this research.  I also acknowledge Dessie comprehensive specialized Hospital for covering of full laboratory cost of the respondents and any necessary support to conduct this research. I also appreciate my data collectors and my study participants for their trusted and cooperative response to my questionnaires. The last but not the least I would like to thank all individuals; my beloved family, and Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital staffs who helped me." We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: "NO- The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized. Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter. 5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide. 6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Partly Reviewer #4: Partly Reviewer #5: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: I Don't Know Reviewer #3: I Don't Know Reviewer #4: Yes Reviewer #5: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: Yes Reviewer #4: No Reviewer #5: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes Reviewer #3: No Reviewer #4: Yes Reviewer #5: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: 1. The title: should be reconsidered. Looking at the line 235 of the manuscript, several factors are associated with the Metabolic syndrome .eg sex and age, yet the author chooses only a few for the title. They may consider "associated factors" without being specific. 2. Abstract: The conclusion on the abstract would need revision. in Line 44 the author uses the words " very emerging " which does not sound right given that we are not comparing it with any specific time in the past , to provide evidence of an increase. 3. Introduction: Would be useful to justify in a paragraph why the author chose a hospital population and not a community sample. 4. Methods: Line 101 need to be checked. The author says " simple random sample to catch up on the subjects" which does not sound very scientific. Line 105: Why did the author choose WHO Steps survey, would help to describe this a bit more and provide reference. Line 125 : What is " Ethiopia's adult classification System" Define first terms the first time they appear, See FBD, HDL ( lines 131, 135). Line 141 Give reference for General physical Questionnaire and report if it has been used previously in similar settings. Line 156: Give reference for the food questionnaire 163: Justify the fact that the one question on sleep is adequate. 5. Discussion: include limitations of the study. Reviewer #2: I have offered specific comments, please find attached review report. Thus, improving the clarity of the study’s reporting guidelines will, in my mind, undoubtedly increase its impact. The study design methodology is currently missing crucial information that should be pre-specified comprehensively and as far as possible in the abstract and methods section. Reviewer #3: 1. Abstract: line 45 - " U " shaped relationships. Relationship for e.g between physical activity and MetS is not U shaped. Low, moderate and high physical activity - The prevalence of Mets is 45%, 27.5% and 13.2 % respectively. Similarly with sleep duration and education level 2. Inconsistent use of waist circumference cut -off values . Line 63-64 - 83.7 cm and 78 cm for males and females respectively - Authors use country specific WC cut off. However, Line 126- 127 , - Authors use IDF criteria 94cm and 80 cm respectively for males and females 3. Sleep categories inconsistent and incorrectly described . Lines 164 -165 - 4 categories noted ,However only 3 are described. Furthermore, the categories in Table 2 are not consistent with those described in the method (lines 164 -165 ), or in the publication that the authors use as a reference 4. Line 169 - Variables with a p value of less than 0.2 in the bivariate analysis were exported to the final model. Although I am aware that it is not incorrect to use this level of significance , can the authors please explain the rationale behind the use of this level of significance in this study. 5. Line 256 -this statement is not correct in two respects. a. The results do not support this statement. The authors state that there was an inverse relationship between level of education and MetS. However, in Table 2 the prevalence of MetS is 20.1 % ,33.5% and 41.9 % in patients with no education, a high school level of education and a college education respectively b. The publication referenced does not contradict this statement. Santos et al (reference 48) indeed reported an inverse relationship between educational level and the prevalence of MetS in their study 6. Table 1 -No currency for monthly income level categories 7. Table 2 - Poorly formatted. 8. Table 3 - "Consumption outside home " needs to be clarified. 9. Table 5 - The prevalence of MetS should be presented as n(%) ,not only n 10. An examples of a significant language error lines 287- 289 : "However, the clear underlying mechanisms related to the relationship between shorter sleep duration and MetS are understood." I believe the authors meant to say the underlying mechanisms between duration of sleep and MetS are not clear or well understood Reviewer #4: This is a very important topic area, metabolic syndrome and its associated risk factors are required in SSA population. However, authors should consider the following suggestions. 1. I think the current title over exaggerates the study, because other risk factors of metabolic syndrome were looked at in the study, why is the author focusing on sleep duration, alcohol drinking and physical activity in the title. 2. Line 206, the author referenced table 4 twice, Table Four ….., S, and BP (Table 4). Please reword 3. The central obesity parameter that was used in this manuscript for African population might have over estimated or underestimated the prevalence among your population. The author have used .. waist circumference ≥83.7 64 cm for males and ≥78.0 cm for females. The harmonized definition suggested that 94 and 80cm should be used for SSA population (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed) . Also an optimal waist circumference cut-off for SSA population has been published by Ekoru et al, 2018(https://www.nature.com/articles/ijo2017240). I will suggest that the authors should re-analyse using either of this cut off. 4. Line 214 .. Aas one becomes aged the probability of having MetS increased as well. Please reword this sentence 5. Generally, I will suggest that the Author edits the manuscript or engage an editor to complete that role on their behalf. 6. Line 287 – 289 .. It seems that both the genetic and environmental factors causing MetS but 288 in this study, the environmental factors predominantly contributed to the rapid increment of 289 MetS and are fully subjected to modification given large-scale interventions are designed. I will suggest that the author should conclude the study following the focus of the variables that were collected, which in this instance are behavioural factors. The author has not collected r discussed any environmental factors for this study, so should not conclude Reviewer #5: The metabolic syndrome is an increased public health issue particularly in low- and middle-income countries (as authors noted). It needs to be well described in both general population and specific population (like patients). The study is of important for both clinician and public health managers in Ethiopia to address MetS in all context. Major comments • Authors have noted (line 83-84) that “Previous studies conducted in Ethiopia have documented a high prevalence of MetS ». Thus, it is not clear why the study was conducted and which gap of knowledge it filled. • Line 94-95: Study site was not described. Authors have to provide more details about the study site (is it a secondary of tertiary hospital? how many bed?, which department of hospital was targeted and why? How many outpatients attended by year? the hospital is located in rural or urban areas, etc.…) • Line 99: it is not clear how the sample size was calculated and how the simple ramdom sampling was performed how the study design was considered in the data analysis. Can authors provide more information about this? • I suggest that authors improve the presentation of the results of their study, mainly subsection about the MetS (line 198-207). Indeed, they have to describe the prevalence of MetS in a paragraph and the components of MetS in another paragraph. In addition, It is not clear why authors check for a correlation between WC and others MetS components since this was not cited as study objective. I recommend the authors to be focus on their study objective in the presentation of the results of their study. • Authors have to provide limitations of their study since the study has many limitations. First, it was conducted in hospital and may not be considered to make inference to the general population of Ethiopia. The behavioral variables might be affected by social desirability bias. • Authors has to provide more details of public health or clinical pratice implication of their study since it was done in health facility. e.g: to organize sensitization campaign targeting patients attended in hospital. Minors comments • I suggest that authors in the title of the manuscript precise the type of the study • Line 56: Please, correct the abbreviation of metabolic syndrome “MetS” instead of “Mets” • Line 63: Please, precise which definition of metabolic syndrome was provided here. It is not clear in the text. • Line 68-69: authors had to indicate why they used the most recent definition (since it is also discussed) • line 73 to 75: Please, provide the reference of the statement • Line 133: the mean of (26) is not clear. • Line 172: the acronym AOR was use for the first, it needs to be defined. • Line 186-190: It is not clear if the prevalence of MetS reported in this paragraph is the history of MetS or MetS diagnosis during the current study. Please, can authors provide clarification? • Line 214: correct Aas • Table 3 line 1 : Please the number 3(0.7) • Please improve the tables formatting ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Sphamandla Josias Nkambule Reviewer #3: No Reviewer #4: No Reviewer #5: Yes: Kadari Cisse [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. Submitted filename: Evaluation Report - Manuscript Review Due 19 Feb 2022 PLOS ONE.docx Click here for additional data file. 1 Jun 2022 We have attached a point-by-point responses for reviewers. Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 7 Jul 2022
PONE-D-21-20970R1
Sleeping Duration, Physical Activity and Alcohol Drinking as Potential Attributes of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults in Ethiopia:  A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Mekonnen, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please revise the title as suggested by Reviewer 1, e.g., into: "Sleeping Duration, Physical Activity, Alcohol Drinking and Other Risk Factors as Potential Attributes of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults in Ethiopia: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study." Please revise the limitations and conclusions as suggested by Reviewer 1 as well. Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 21 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Bart Ferket Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Additional METS STUDY COMMENTS 1. I still feel the Title needs to be reflective of the content of the manuscript. Because the authors accepts that fact, they should coin a title that includes more than sleep, physical activity and alcohol. 2. Given that only one question was asked about sleep, I propose that this is captured as part of the limitations. 3. I appreciate the inclusion of the limitation section-the statement “ undoubtedly reproducible” on line 345 can be replace with more gentle statement like“ may be generalized..because….” 4. The last two sentences on the conclusion section do not sound appropriate They can be reworded to encourage not sound like a warning “Unless the national health policy for NCDs prevention is revised and effectively implemented, the developmental progress of the nation will be stepped backed due to the high health care expenditure, high disability adjusted life years and economic crisis. In general the global commitment designed targets in the Sustainable Development Goals will be off-track by 2030” Reviewer #2: Thank you, for affording me the opportunity to review your work. This manuscript is a herculean effort and an enjoyable read. The study’s objectives are essential in understanding the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and patterns of attributable risk factors in adults. Moreover, this topic is significant, considering the more ageing adult population’s unprecedented growth and the projected increase in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome globally. After rigorously reviewing the revised manuscript, the authors have adequately addressed my comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication. Kudos, to the team! ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Sphamandla Josias Nkambule ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
Submitted filename: METS SSTUDY COMMENTS.docx Click here for additional data file. 7 Jul 2022 We have addressed the comments given by the reviewers and attached a file. Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 12 Jul 2022 Sleeping Duration, Physical Activity, Alcohol Drinking and Other Risk Factors as Potential Attributes of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults in Ethiopia:  A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study PONE-D-21-20970R2 Dear Dr. Mekonnen, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Bart Ferket Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: 2 Aug 2022 PONE-D-21-20970R2 Sleeping Duration, Physical Activity, Alcohol Drinking and Other Risk Factors as Potential Attributes of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults in Ethiopia:  A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study Dear Dr. Mekonnen: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Bart Ferket Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  52 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Overnutrition and nutritional deficiency contribute to metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis in Asian Indians.

Authors:  Anoop Misra
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 3.  Sex differences in the metabolic syndrome: implications for cardiovascular health in women.

Authors:  Aruna D Pradhan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  The metabolic syndrome in Africa: Current trends.

Authors:  Christian I Okafor
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-01

5.  An update on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its associated factors in rural northeast China.

Authors:  Shasha Yu; Xiaofan Guo; Hongmei Yang; Liqiang Zheng; Yingxian Sun
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Habitual Alcohol Consumption and Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Sleep Disordered Breathing.

Authors:  Su Jung Choi; Sung Ik Lee; Eun Yeon Joo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relationships between different types of physical activity and metabolic syndrome among Taiwanese workers.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Huang; Ren-Hau Li; Shu-Ling Huang; Hon-Ke Sia; Su-Shiang Lee; Wei-Hsun Wang; Feng-Cheng Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Paul L Hess; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Daniel J Friedman; Hillary Mulder; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Wayne R Rosamond; Renato D Lopes; Bernard J Gersh; Daniel B Mark; Lesley H Curtis; Wendy S Post; Ronald J Prineas; Nona Sotoodehnia; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Metabolic Syndrome among Brazilian Adult Population: National Health Survey - 2013.

Authors:  Elyssia Karine Nunes Mendonça Ramires; Risia Cristina Egito de Menezes; Giovana Longo-Silva; Taíse Gama Dos Santos; Patrícia de Menezes Marinho; Jonas Augusto Cardoso da Silveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Association between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Claire E Kim; Sangah Shin; Hwi-Won Lee; Jiyeon Lim; Jong-Koo Lee; Aesun Shin; Daehee Kang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.