| Literature DB >> 36036794 |
Lili Xiao1, Hong Cheng1, Haiqing Cai1, Yue Wei1, Gaohui Zan1, Xiuming Feng1, Chaoqun Liu1, Longman Li1, Lulu Huang1, Fei Wang1, Xing Chen1, Yunfeng Zou2, Xiaobo Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to heavy metals has been reported to be associated with multiple diseases. However, direct associations and potential mechanisms of heavy metals with physical disability remain unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36036794 PMCID: PMC9423034 DOI: 10.1289/EHP10602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 11.035
General characteristics and blood metals levels of the study population between 2016 and 2018 in Guangxi, China ().
| Total | Non-ADL disability | ADL disability | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | 4,391 | 3,430 | 961 | — |
| Sex [ | ||||
| Male | 1,779 (40.5) | 1,547 (45.1) | 232 (24.1) |
|
| Female | 2,612 (59.5) | 1,883 (54.9) | 729 (75.9) | |
| Age [y ( |
|
|
|
|
| BMI [ |
|
|
| 0.010 |
| Education attainment [ | ||||
| Less than primary school | 2,004 (45.6) | 1,372 (40.0) | 632 (65.8) |
|
| Primary school | 1,461 (33.3) | 1,199 (35.0) | 262 (27.2) | |
| High school and above | 926 (21.1) | 859 (25.0) | 67 (7.00) | |
| Annual income [ | ||||
| | 1,697 (38.6) | 1,189 (34.7) | 508 (52.8) |
|
| | 1,151 (26.2) | 913 (26.6) | 238 (24.8) | |
| | 1,543 (35.1) | 1,328 (38.7) | 215 (22.4) | |
| Cigarette smoking [ | ||||
| Current smokers | 695 (15.8) | 613 (17.9) | 82 (8.50) |
|
| Former smokers | 55 (1.30) | 54 (1.60) | 1.00 (1.00) | |
| Nonsmokers | 3,641 (82.9) | 2,763 (80.5) | 878 (91.5) | |
| Alcohol drinking [ | ||||
| Current drinkers | 1,004 (22.8) | 879 (25.6) | 125 (13.0) |
|
| Former drinkers | 30 (0.70) | 26 (0.80) | 4 (0.40) | |
| Nondrinkers | 3,357 (76.5) | 2,525 (73.6) | 832 (86.6) | |
| Insomnia [ | ||||
| Yes | 1,504 (34.3) | 1,132 (33.0) | 372 (38.7) | 0.001 |
| No | 2,887 (65.7) | 2,298 (67.0) | 589 (61.3) | |
| Blood metals [ | ||||
| Manganese (Mn) | 22.1 (9.20) | 21.8 (9.06) | 23.4 (9.87) |
|
| Copper (Cu) | 864 (182) | 855 (179) | 892 (189) |
|
| Zinc (Zn) | 10,850 (2550) | 10,900 (2550) | 10,760 (2550) | 0.330 |
| Arsenic (As) | 2.25 (1.07) | 2.23 (1.08) | 2.32 (1.10) | 0.007 |
| Cadmium (Cd) | 3.63 (3.62) | 3.57 (3.58) | 3.93 (3.70) |
|
| Lead (Pb) | 51.3 (28.4) | 51.3 (28.8) | 51.2 (27.6) | 0.650 |
Note: Data were complete for all variables and presented as n (%) for categorical data, for parametrically distributed data, or median (IQR) for nonparametrically distributed data. p-Values were estimated by Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables according to the data distribution and chi-square test for categorical variables. —, no data; ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; RMB, renminbi; SD, standard deviation.
Associations of blood metal with prevalence of ADL disability in single-metal and multimetal models for participants between 2016 and 2018 in Guangxi, China.
| Variables | ORs (95% CIs) for ADL disability per SD higher difference in | ORs (95% CIs) for ADL disability per SD higher difference in | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Single-metal models | ||||
| Manganese (Mn) | 1.14 (1.05, 1.24) | 0.002 | 1.15 (1.01, 1.32) | 0.003 |
| Copper (Cu) | 1.16 (1.07, 1.26) |
| 1.16 (1.01, 1.34) | 0.001 |
| Zinc (Zn) | 1.02 (0.945, 1.11) | 0.582 | 1.00 (0.87, 1.16) | 0.964 |
| Arsenic (As) | 1.22 (1.13, 1.33) |
| 1.25 (1.08, 1.45) |
|
| Cadmium (Cd) | 1.15 (1.06, 1.26) | 0.001 | 1.16 (1.02, 1.33) | 0.002 |
| Lead (Pb) | 1.09 (1.00, 1.19) | 0.050 | 1.10 (0.969, 1.26) | 0.134 |
| Multimetal model | ||||
| Manganese (Mn) | 1.16 (1.06, 1.26) | 0.001 | 1.15 (1.01, 1.31) | 0.003 |
| Copper (Cu) | 1.18 (1.08, 1.29) |
| 1.17 (1.03, 1.35) | 0.001 |
| Arsenic (As) | 1.17 (1.06, 1.28) |
| 1.22 (1.11, 1.33) |
|
| Cadmium (Cd) | 1.10 (1.00, 1.20) | 0.049 | 1.11 (1.01, 1.21) | 0.045 |
Note: Concentrations of blood manganese, copper, zinc, arsenic, cadmium, and lead were -transformed due to right-skewed distributions. The OR and 95% CI of ADL disability were estimated by 1-SD higher difference in -transformed metals as continuous variables. p-Values of single-metal were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models with the inclusion of each metal individually, and p-values of multimetal models derived from including all six metals simultaneously in the multivariate logistic regression model. All models were adjusted for sex (male or female), age (continuous), BMI (continuous), education (less than primary school, primary school, high school and above), annual income ( RMB, and , RMB), smoking status (current smokers, former smokers, non-smokers), drinking status (current drinkers, former drinkers, non-drinkers), and insomnia (yes or no). ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; RMB, renminbi; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1.Associations between heavy metals mixture and prevalence of activities of daily living (ADL) disability estimated by Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) for participants between 2016 and 2018 in Guangxi, China () (see Excel Tables S1–S4 for corresponding numeric data). Models were adjusted for sex (male or female), age (continuous), BMI (continuous), education (less than primary school, primary school, high school and above), annual income ( RMB, and RMB, RMB), smoking status (current smokers, former smokers, nonsmokers), drinking status (current drinkers, former drinkers, nondrinkers), and insomnia (yes or no). (A) Overall association between the heavy metal mixture (estimates and 95% confidence intervals) and ADL disability. This figure plots the estimated difference in the probit of ADL disability when exposures are at a particular percentile (x-axis) in comparison with when exposure are all at the 50th percentile. (B) Single pollutant association (estimates and 95% confidence intervals). This plot compares the probit of ADL disability when a single pollutant is at the 75th vs. 25th percentile, when all the other exposures are fixed at either the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile. (C) Univariate exposure–response functions and 95% confidence bands for each metal with the other pollutants fixed at the median. (D) Bivariate exposure–response functions for one metal when another metal fixed at either the 25th, 50th, or 75th percentile and the remaining metals are fixed at the median. Note: ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; RMB, renminbi.
Figure 2.Volcano plot of the association between DNA methylation and ADL disability in the epigenome-wide analysis (A) and QQ plot for epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) performed for ADL disability (B) among participants between 2016 and 2018 in Guangxi, China () (see Table S4 for corresponding numeric data). In the volcano plot, the x-axis indicates the association of DNA methylation at each CpG site with ADL disability, and y-axis indicates the false discovery rate value. The empty dots represent genome-wide significant CpG sites passing the threshold of a false discovery rate threshold at and |delta beta| at 0.2. In the QQ plot, the graph represents the deviation of the observed p-values plotted against the expected values from a theoretical distribution. The genomic inflation of the analyses was calculated using BACON package and the lambda () of the model was 1.29. Note: ADL, activities of daily living; EWAS, epigenome-wide association study; QQ, quantile–quantile.
Figure 3.Associations of metals with ADL disability-associated DNA methylation for participants between 2016 and 2018 in Guangxi, China (). Adjusted models were adjusted for sex (male or female), age (continuous), BMI (continuous), education (less than primary school, primary school, high school and above), annual income ( RMB, and RMB, RMB), smoking status (current smokers, former smokers, nonsmokers), drinking status (current drinkers, former drinkers, nondrinkers), and insomnia (yes or no). The and 95% CI of DNA methylation changes were estimated by 1-SD higher difference in -transformed metals as continuous variables. Note: ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; RMB, renminbi; SD, standard deviation.
Mediating effects of DNA methylation related to blood metals and ADL disability for participants between 2016 and 2018 in Guangxi, China ().
| Blood metals | Mediators | Gene description | Estimated natural direct effects (NDE, 95% CI) | Estimated natural indirect effect (NIE, 95% CI) | Proportion mediated (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manganese | cg10725542 |
| 0.541 ( | 0.041 ( | 7.04 | 0.540 |
| cg22000984 |
| 0.385 ( | 0.173 (0.037, 0.350) | 31.0 | 0.039 | |
| cg23012519 |
| 0.395 ( | 0.179 (0.039, 0.357) | 31.2 | 0.026 | |
| Copper | cg04875128 |
| 0.953 ( | NA | — | |
| cg05825244 |
| 0.909 ( | 0.03 ( | 3.19 | 0.340 | |
| cg06723863 |
| 0.733 ( | 0.352 (0.033, 0.786) | 32.4 | 0.042 | |
| cg22000984 |
| 1.695 ( | NA | — | ||
| Arsenic | cg07839457 |
| 0.616 ( | 0.007 ( | 1.12 | 0.157 |
| cg09199338 |
| 0.697 (0.022, 1.41) | NA | — | ||
| cg14255237 |
| 0.862 (0.156, 1.61) | NA | — | ||
| cg15931375 |
| 0.616 ( | 0.005 ( | 0.810 | 0.171 | |
| cg23379566 |
| 0.581 ( | 0.042 ( | 6.74 | 0.253 | |
| cg24433124 |
| 0.577 ( | 0.108 (0.010, 0.243) | 15.8 | 0.038 | |
| cg26682566 |
| 0.725 (0.043, 1.45) | NA | — | ||
| Cadmium | cg07905190 |
| 0.193 ( | 0.053 (0.003, 0.122) | 21.5 | 0.023 |
| cg11784243 |
| 0.218 ( | 0.033 ( | 13.2 | 0.380 | |
| cg11960359 |
| 0.231 ( | 0.047 ( | 16.9 | 0.219 | |
| cg17485717 |
| 0.205 ( | 0.090 (0.021, 0.180) | 30.5 | 0.010 | |
| cg17951445 |
| 0.212 ( | 0.032 ( | 13.1 | 0.203 | |
| cg26413501 |
| 0.241 ( | NA | — |
Note: —, no data; ADL, activities of daily living; CI, confidence interval; NDE, natural direct effect; NIE, natural indirect effect.
Mediating (indirect) effect represented effects mediated through DNA methylation and was calculated as a statistical relationship using the “product of coefficients” that multiplies changes in DNA methylation with blood metals and changes in ADL disability with DNA methylation from the “mediation” package.
The proportion of mediation by DNA methylation was calculated as the following formula: Prop. .
NA represents that proportion mediated cannot be calculated when there are opposite signs between the direct effect and the mediated effect.
-Values of mediation was evaluated by the significance test of “product of coefficients” using “mediation” package in R.