Esther García-Esquinas1, Ana Navas-Acien2, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez3, Fernando Rodríguez Artalejo4. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/ IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: esthergge@gmail.com. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Environmental Epidemiology and Cancer Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/ IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental lead and cadmium exposure is associated with higher risk of several age-related chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and osteoporosis. These diseases may lead to frailty, a geriatric syndrome characterized by diminished physiologic reserve in multiple systems with decreased ability to cope with acute stressors. However, no previous study has evaluated the association between lead or cadmium exposure and frailty. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among individuals aged ≥ 60 years who participated in the third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and had either blood lead (N=5272) or urine cadmium (N=4887) determinations. Frailty was ascertained with a slight modification of the Fried criteria, so that individuals meeting ≥ 3 of 5 pre-defined criteria (exhaustion, low body weight, low physical activity, weakness and slow walking speed), were considered as frail. The association between lead and cadmium with frailty was evaluated using logistic regression with adjustment for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Median (intertertile range) concentrations of blood lead and urine cadmium were 3.9 µg/dl (2.9-4.9) and 0.62 µg/l (0.41-0.91), respectively. The prevalence of frailty was 7.1%. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of frailty comparing the second and third to the lowest tertile of blood lead were, respectively, 1.40 (0.96-2.04) and 1.75 (1.33-2.31). Lead concentrations were also associated with the frequency of exhaustion, weakness and slowness. The corresponding odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for cadmium were, respectively, 0.97 (0.68-1.39) and 1.55 (1.03-2.32), but this association did not hold after excluding participants with reduced glomerular filtration rate: 0.70 (0.43-1.14) and 1.09 (0.56-2.11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the US older adult population, blood lead but not urine cadmium concentrations showed a direct dose-response relationship with frailty. These findings support that lead exposure increases frailty in older adults.
BACKGROUND: Environmental lead and cadmium exposure is associated with higher risk of several age-related chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and osteoporosis. These diseases may lead to frailty, a geriatric syndrome characterized by diminished physiologic reserve in multiple systems with decreased ability to cope with acute stressors. However, no previous study has evaluated the association between lead or cadmium exposure and frailty. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among individuals aged ≥ 60 years who participated in the third U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and had either blood lead (N=5272) or urine cadmium (N=4887) determinations. Frailty was ascertained with a slight modification of the Fried criteria, so that individuals meeting ≥ 3 of 5 pre-defined criteria (exhaustion, low body weight, low physical activity, weakness and slow walking speed), were considered as frail. The association between lead and cadmium with frailty was evaluated using logistic regression with adjustment for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Median (intertertile range) concentrations of blood lead and urine cadmium were 3.9 µg/dl (2.9-4.9) and 0.62 µg/l (0.41-0.91), respectively. The prevalence of frailty was 7.1%. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of frailty comparing the second and third to the lowest tertile of blood lead were, respectively, 1.40 (0.96-2.04) and 1.75 (1.33-2.31). Lead concentrations were also associated with the frequency of exhaustion, weakness and slowness. The corresponding odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for cadmium were, respectively, 0.97 (0.68-1.39) and 1.55 (1.03-2.32), but this association did not hold after excluding participants with reduced glomerular filtration rate: 0.70 (0.43-1.14) and 1.09 (0.56-2.11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the US older adult population, blood lead but not urine cadmium concentrations showed a direct dose-response relationship with frailty. These findings support that lead exposure increases frailty in older adults.
Authors: Aleksandra Wilk; Elżbieta Kalisińska; Danuta I Kosik-Bogacka; Maciej Romanowski; Jacek Różański; Kazimierz Ciechanowski; Marcin Słojewski; Natalia Łanocha-Arendarczyk Journal: Environ Geochem Health Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.609
Authors: Xiaomin Nie; Ningjian Wang; Yi Chen; Chi Chen; Bing Han; Chunfang Zhu; Yingchao Chen; Fangzhen Xia; Zhen Cang; Meng Lu; Ying Meng; Boren Jiang; Michael D Jensen; Yingli Lu Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Joshua D Chandler; Cherry Wongtrakool; Sophia A Banton; Shuzhao Li; Michael L Orr; Dana Boyd Barr; David C Neujahr; Roy L Sutliff; Young-Mi Go; Dean P Jones Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2016-07
Authors: Martha Carvalho Pereira Teixeira; Fernando Martins Carvalho; Liliane Lins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 3.390