Literature DB >> 36035815

Development of a Bayesian inference model for assessing ventilation condition based on CO2 meters in primary schools.

Danlin Hou1, Liangzhu Leon Wang1, Ali Katal1, Shujie Yan1, Liang Grace Zhou2, Vicky Wang2, Mark Vuotari2, Ethan Li1, Zihan Xie1.   

Abstract

Outdoor fresh air ventilation plays a significant role in reducing airborne transmission of diseases in indoor spaces. School classrooms are considerably challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the increasing need for in-person education, untimely and incompleted vaccinations, high occupancy density, and uncertain ventilation conditions. Many schools started to use CO2 meters to indicate air quality, but how to interpret the data remains unclear. Many uncertainties are also involved, including manual readings, student numbers and schedules, uncertain CO2 generation rates, and variable indoor and ambient conditions. This study proposed a Bayesian inference approach with sensitivity analysis to understand CO2 readings in four primary schools by identifying uncertainties and calibrating key parameters. The outdoor ventilation rate, CO2 generation rate, and occupancy level were identified as the top sensitive parameters for indoor CO2 levels. The occupancy schedule becomes critical when the CO2 data are limited, whereas a 15-min measurement interval could capture dynamic CO2 profiles well even without the occupancy information. Hourly CO2 recording should be avoided because it failed to capture peak values and overestimated the ventilation rates. For the four primary school rooms, the calibrated ventilation rate with a 95% confidence level for fall condition is 1.96±0.31 ACH for Room #1 (165 m3 and 20 occupancies) with mechanical ventilation, and for the rest of the naturally ventilated rooms, it is 0.40±0.08 ACH for Room #2 (236 m3 and 21 occupancies), 0.30±0.04 or 0.79±0.06 ACH depending on occupancy schedules for Room #3 (236 m3 and 19 occupancies), 0.40±0.32,0.48±0.37,0.72±0.39 ACH for Room #4 (231 m3 and 8-9 occupancies) for three consecutive days. © Tsinghua University Press 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian calibration; CO2; COVID-19; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; school; ventilation rate

Year:  2022        PMID: 36035815      PMCID: PMC9395798          DOI: 10.1007/s12273-022-0926-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Build Simul        ISSN: 1996-3599            Impact factor:   4.008


  10 in total

1.  Bayesian calibration of a natural history model with application to a population model for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sophie Whyte; Cathal Walsh; Jim Chilcott
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.

Authors:  Marcel Van Oijen; Jonathan Rougier; Ron Smith
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Kimberly A Prather; Chia C Wang; Robert T Schooley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Carbon dioxide generation rates for building occupants.

Authors:  A Persily; L de Jonge
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  Personal CO2 cloud: laboratory measurements of metabolic CO2 inhalation zone concentration and dispersion in a typical office desk setting.

Authors:  Jovan Pantelic; Shichao Liu; Lorenza Pistore; Dusan Licina; Matthew Vannucci; Sasan Sadrizadeh; Ali Ghahramani; Brian Gilligan; Esther Sternberg; Kevin Kampschroer; Stefano Schiavon
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).

Authors:  Lynne Sehulster; Raymond Y W Chinn
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2003-06-06

7.  Comparison of the characteristics of small commercial NDIR CO2 sensor models and development of a portable CO2 measurement device.

Authors:  Tomomi Yasuda; Seiichiro Yonemura; Akira Tani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Review and Extension of CO₂-Based Methods to Determine Ventilation Rates with Application to School Classrooms.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The coronavirus pandemic and aerosols: Does COVID-19 transmit via expiratory particles?

Authors:  Sima Asadi; Nicole Bouvier; Anthony S Wexler; William D Ristenpart
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.908

10.  Effect of ventilation improvement during a tuberculosis outbreak in underventilated university buildings.

Authors:  Chun-Ru Du; Shun-Chih Wang; Ming-Chih Yu; Ting-Fang Chiu; Jann-Yuan Wang; Pei-Chun Chuang; Ruwen Jou; Pei-Chun Chan; Chi-Tai Fang
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 5.770

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.