Literature DB >> 15870058

Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.

Marcel Van Oijen1, Jonathan Rougier, Ron Smith.   

Abstract

Process-based forest models generally have many parameters, multiple outputs of interest and a small underlying empirical database. These characteristics hamper parameterization. Bayesian calibration offers a solution to the calibration problem because it applies to models of any type or size. It provides parameter estimates, with measures of uncertainty and correlation among the parameters. The procedure begins by quantifying the uncertainty about parameter values in the form of a prior probability distribution. Then data on the output variables are used to update the parameter distribution by means of Bayes' Theorem. This yields a posterior calibrated distribution for the parameters, which can be summarized in the form of a mean vector and variance matrix. The predictive uncertainty of the model can be quantified by running it with different parameter settings, sampled from the posterior distribution. In a further step, one may evaluate the posterior probability of the model itself (rather than that of the parameters) and compare that against the probability of other models, to aid in model selection or improvement. Bayesian calibration of process-based models cannot be performed analytically, so the posterior parameter distribution must be approximated in the form of a representative sample of parameter values. This can be achieved by means of Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation, which is suitable for process-based models because of its simplicity and because it does not require advance knowledge of the shape of the posterior distribution. Despite the suitability of Bayesian calibration, the technique has rarely been used in forestry research. We introduce the method, using the example of a typical forest model. Further, we show that reductions in parameter uncertainty, and thus in output uncertainty, can be effected by increasing the variety of data, increasing the accuracy of measurements and increasing the length of time series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15870058     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.7.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  15 in total

Review 1.  Systems approaches in global change and biogeochemistry research.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Fabrizio Albanito; Madeleine Bell; Jessica Bellarby; Sergey Blagodatskiy; Arindam Datta; Marta Dondini; Nuala Fitton; Helen Flynn; Astley Hastings; Jon Hillier; Edward O Jones; Matthias Kuhnert; Dali R Nayak; Mark Pogson; Mark Richards; Gosia Sozanska-Stanton; Shifeng Wang; Jagadeesh B Yeluripati; Emily Bottoms; Chris Brown; Jenny Farmer; Diana Feliciano; Cui Hao; Andy Robertson; Sylvia Vetter; Hon Man Wong; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Bayesian calibration of the Unified budburst model in six temperate tree species.

Authors:  Yongshuo H Fu; Matteo Campioli; Gaston Demarée; Alex Deckmyn; Rafiq Hamdi; Ivan A Janssens; Gaby Deckmyn
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Cross-scale integration of knowledge for predicting species ranges: a metamodeling framework.

Authors:  Matthew V Talluto; Isabelle Boulangeat; Aitor Ameztegui; Isabelle Aubin; Dominique Berteaux; Alyssa Butler; Frédérik Doyon; C Ronnie Drever; Marie-Josée Fortin; Tony Franceschini; Jean Liénard; Dan McKenney; Kevin A Solarik; Nikolay Strigul; Wilfried Thuiller; Dominique Gravel
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.144

4.  Towards a Stochastic Model to Simulate Grapevine Architecture: A Case Study on Digitized Riesling Vines Considering Effects of Elevated CO2.

Authors:  Dominik Schmidt; Katrin Kahlen; Christopher Bahr; Matthias Friedel
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17

5.  Uncertainty in Ecohydrological Modeling in an Arid Region Determined with Bayesian Methods.

Authors:  Junjun Yang; Zhibin He; Jun Du; Longfei Chen; Xi Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models.

Authors:  R Rincent; E Kuhn; H Monod; F-X Oury; M Rousset; V Allard; J Le Gouis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  The impact of winter and spring temperatures on temperate tree budburst dates: results from an experimental climate manipulation.

Authors:  Yongshuo H Fu; Matteo Campioli; Gaby Deckmyn; Ivan A Janssens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An objective approach to model reduction: Application to the Sirius wheat model.

Authors:  N M J Crout; J Craigon; G M Cox; Y Jao; D Tarsitano; A T A Wood; M Semenov
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.734

9.  Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay.

Authors:  Christina Kaiser; Oskar Franklin; Ulf Dieckmann; Andreas Richter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Modelling water use efficiency in a dynamic environment: An example using Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S Vialet-Chabrand; J S A Matthews; O Brendel; M R Blatt; Y Wang; A Hills; H Griffiths; S Rogers; T Lawson
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.729

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.