Literature DB >> 21127321

Bayesian calibration of a natural history model with application to a population model for colorectal cancer.

Sophie Whyte1, Cathal Walsh2,3, Jim Chilcott1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer natural history models are essential when evaluating screening/preventative interventions or changes to diagnostic pathways. Natural history models commonly use a state transition structure, but it is often not possible to observe the state transition probabilities required for parameterization. AIM: . The work aimed to accurately represent the uncertainty in the parameters of a state transition model for the natural history of colorectal cancer by embedding the problem in the framework of Bayesian inference.
METHODS: The Metropolis-Hastings algorithm was used to estimate natural history parameters and screening test characteristics by generating multiple sets of parameters from the posterior distribution, which is the probability distribution that is compatible with the observed data. Observed data included colorectal cancer incidence categorized by age and stage, autopsy data on polyp prevalence, and cancer and polyp detection rates from the first round of screening with the fecal occult blood test in England. The approach was implemented using Visual Basic.
RESULTS: The results were subsequently examined for convergence using the package CODA in R 2.8.0. Outputs from fitting were samples from the joint posterior distribution of the natural history parameters given the epidemiological data. The parameter sets obtained are shown to have a good fit to all the observed data sets. These parameter sets are used when running probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSION: The advantages of this strategy are that it draws efficiently from a high-dimensional correlated parameter space. The algorithm is simple to code and runs overnight on a standard desktop PC. Using this method, the parameter sets are drawn according to their posterior probability given calibration data, and thus they correctly summarize the residual uncertainty in the parameter space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21127321     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10384738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  19 in total

1.  Calibration of complex models through Bayesian evidence synthesis: a demonstration and tutorial.

Authors:  Christopher H Jackson; Mark Jit; Linda D Sharples; Daniela De Angelis
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Nicolas A Menzies; Djøra I Soeteman; Ankur Pandya; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.

Authors:  Willie Hamilton; Fiona M Walter; Greg Rubin; Richard D Neal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Improved estimates of visual field progression using bayesian linear regression to integrate structural information in patients with ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; Balwantray C Chauhan; David P Crabb; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Chloe Thomas; Sophie Whyte; James Chilcott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.558

6.  Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.

Authors:  Aditya Sai; Carolina Vivas-Valencia; Thomas F Imperiale; Nan Kong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  CaliPro: A Calibration Protocol That Utilizes Parameter Density Estimation to Explore Parameter Space and Calibrate Complex Biological Models.

Authors:  Louis R Joslyn; Denise E Kirschner; Jennifer J Linderman
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  L Sharp; L Tilson; S Whyte; A O'Ceilleachair; C Walsh; C Usher; P Tappenden; J Chilcott; A Staines; M Barry; H Comber
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Lesley Tilson; Sophie Whyte; Alan O Ceilleachair; Cathal Walsh; Cara Usher; Paul Tappenden; James Chilcott; Anthony Staines; Michael Barry; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Cancer care coordinators in stage III colon cancer: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Tony Blakely; Lucie Collinson; Giorgi Kvizhinadze; Nisha Nair; Rachel Foster; Elizabeth Dennett; Diana Sarfati
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.