| Literature DB >> 36034209 |
Rui Mei1, Fan Peng2,3, Jing Xiong4, Chanyuan Liu5, Xiu Liu6, Fang Wang7, Lu Lv8.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the independent risk factors for the occurrence of postpartum depression (PPD) in elderly primiparas and the effect of mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) on improving the PPD. Two hundred cases of elderly primiparas who underwent delivery in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were enrolled as study participants and divided into an occurrence group (n = 60) and a nonoccurrence group (n = 140) according to whether they developed PPD. The occurrence group was divided into a study group (n = 30) receiving MBI and a control group (n = 30) without any intervention. Independent risk factors influencing the occurrence of PPD were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The effect of the intervention was also analyzed in the study group. Education level, marital status, household monthly income per person, sex of the newborn, milk volume, sleep quality, and relationship with in-laws were risk factors for the development of PPD. After the intervention, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire scores were increased in the study group and were higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The study group also exhibited higher 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores, lower Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale scores than the control group (P < 0.05). A variety of independent risk factors affected the occurrence of PPD in elderly primiparas, and MBI should be targeted clinically to reduce their negative emotions, increase psychological resilience, and improve their quality of life.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36034209 PMCID: PMC9392605 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4202676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Univariate analysis of postpartum depression (n (%)).
| Factor | Occurrence group ( | Nonoccurrence group ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Age (years) | ||||
| 35–39 | 37 (61.7) | 91 (65.0) | 0.203 | 0.653 |
| >39 | 23 (38.3) | 49 (35.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Education level | ||||
| High school and below | 11 (18.3) | 45 (32.1) | 9.513 | 0.009 |
| Junior college | 18 (30.0) | 41 (29.3) | ||
| Bachelor's degree and above | 31 (51.7) | 54 (38.6) | ||
|
| ||||
| Occupation | ||||
| Yes | 42 (70.0) | 105 (75.0) | 0.539 | 0.463 |
| No | 18 (30.0) | 35 (25.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Marital status | ||||
| First marriage | 27 (45.0) | 95 (67.9) | 9.224 | 0.002 |
| Remarriage | 33 (55.0) | 45 (32.1) | ||
|
| ||||
| Household income per person | ||||
| <3000 | 28 (46.7) | 25 (17.9) | 22.070 | 0.000 |
| 3000–5000 | 22 (36.7) | 53 (37.9) | ||
| >5000 | 10 (16.6) | 62 (44.2) | ||
|
| ||||
| Whether planning to get pregnant | ||||
| Yes | 41 (68.3) | 95 (67.9) | 0.004 | 0.947 |
| No | 19 (31.7) | 45 (32.1) | ||
|
| ||||
| Mode of delivery | ||||
| Vaginal delivery | 38 (63.3) | 96 (68.6) | 0.521 | 0.470 |
| C-section | 22 (36.7) | 44 (31.4) | ||
|
| ||||
| Sex of newborn | ||||
| Male | 23 (38.3) | 78 (55.7) | 5.076 | 0.024 |
| Female | 37 (61.7) | 62 (44.3) | ||
|
| ||||
| Milk volume | ||||
| High | 11 (18.3) | 27 (19.3) | 13.105 | 0.001 |
| Moderate | 19 (31.7) | 78 (55.7) | ||
| Little or none | 30 (50.0) | 35 (25.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Feeding pattern | ||||
| Hand-feeding | 9 (15.0) | 12 (8.6) | 6.169 | 0.046 |
| Mixed feeding | 19 (31.7) | 28 (20) | ||
| Breastfeeding | 32 (53.3) | 100 (71.4) | ||
|
| ||||
| Maternal personality | ||||
| Introvert | 12 (20.0) | 25 (17.9) | 6.332 | 0.042 |
| Between introversion and extroversion | 31 (51.7) | 95 (67.8) | ||
| Extrovert | 17 (28.3) | 20 (14.3) | ||
|
| ||||
| Quality of sleep | ||||
| Good | 11 (18.3) | 53 (37.9) | 42.695 | 0.000 |
| Fair | 14 (23.3) | 68 (48.6) | ||
| Poor | 35 (58.4) | 19 (13.5) | ||
|
| ||||
| Relationship with in-laws | ||||
| Good | 10 (16.7) | 67 (47.8) | 18.503 | 0.000 |
| Fair | 24 (40.0) | 42 (30.0) | ||
| Poor | 26 (43.3) | 31 (22.2) | ||
|
| ||||
| Relationship with husband | ||||
| Good | 12 (20.0) | 92 (65.8) | 6.827 | 0.033 |
| Fair | 35 (58.3) | 29 (20.7) | ||
| Poor | 13 (21.7) | 19 (13.5) | ||
Logistic regression analysis of postpartum depression.
| Variables |
| SE | Wals |
| OR | 95% CI for exp | |
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Education level | 0.137 | 0.841 | 7.643 | 0.011 | 1.147 | 1.022 | 4.417 |
| Marital status | 0.388 | 0.954 | 4.346 | 0.023 | 1.474 | 1.169 | 6.434 |
| Household income per person (RMB) | 1.568 | 0.670 | 5.486 | 0.019 | 4.799 | 1.292 | 17.830 |
| Sex of newborn | 0.267 | 0.915 | 4.132 | 0.019 | 1.306 | 1.089 | 4.693 |
| Milk volume | 1.783 | 0.548 | 10.580 | 0.001 | 5.945 | 2.031 | 17.423 |
| Feeding pattern | 0.872 | 0.475 | 3.369 | 0.066 | 2.393 | 0.943 | 6.073 |
| Maternal personality | 0.386 | 0.891 | 1.363 | 0.286 | 1.471 | 0.119 | 4.714 |
| Quality of sleep | 1.611 | 0.449 | 12.872 | 0.000 | 5.010 | 2.077 | 12.082 |
| Relationship with in-laws | 1.254 | 0.506 | 6.142 | 0.013 | 3.504 | 1.300 | 9.445 |
| Relationship with husband | 0.574 | 0.522 | 1.208 | 0.272 | 1.755 | 0.638 | 4.935 |
Β, standardized coefficient; SE, standard error; Wals, Wald statistic; P, probability level; OR, odd ratio, 95% CI for Exp, the OR value of the corresponding variable and its 95% confidence interval.
Comparison of preintervention indicators (n (%)).
| Factor | Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Education level | ||||
| High school and below | 6 (20.0) | 5 (16.7) | 0.603 | 0.740 |
| Junior college | 10 (33.3) | 8 (26.7) | ||
| Bachelor's degree and above | 14 (46.7) | 17 (56.7) | ||
|
| ||||
| Marital status | ||||
| First marriage | 12 (40.0) | 15 (50.0) | 0.606 | 0.436 |
| Remarriage | 18 (60.0) | 15 (50.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Household income per person | ||||
| <3000 | 15 (50.0) | 13 (43.3) | 1.925 | 0.382 |
| 3000–5000 | 12 (40.0) | 10 (33.3) | ||
| >5000 | 3 (10.0) | 7 (23.4) | ||
|
| ||||
| Sex of newborn | ||||
| Male | 10 (33.3) | 13 (43.3) | 0.635 | 0.426 |
| Female | 20 (66.7) | 17 (56.7) | ||
| Milk volume | ||||
|
| ||||
| Large | 8 (26.7) | 3 (10.0) | 2.880 | 0.237 |
| Moderate | 8 (26.7) | 11 (36.7) | ||
| Little or none | 14 (46.6) | 16 (53.3) | ||
|
| ||||
| Quality of sleep | ||||
| Good | 5 (16.7) | 6 (20.0) | 0.405 | 0.817 |
| Fair | 8 (26.7) | 6 (20.0) | ||
| Poor | 17 (56.6) | 18 (60.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Relationship with in-laws | ||||
| Good | 4 (13.4) | 6 (20.0) | 0.567 | 0.753 |
| Fair | 13 (43.3) | 11 (36.7) | ||
| Poor | 13 (43.3) | 13 (43.3) | ||
Figure 1Mindfulness level scores before and after intervention. #P < 0.05 for comparison within group before and after the intervention, P < 0.05 for comparison between groups after the intervention.
Figure 2Analysis of psychological resilience. #P < 0.05 for comparison within group before and after the intervention, P < 0.05 for comparison between groups after the intervention.
Figure 3Comparative analysis of depression before and after intervention. #P < 0.05 for comparison within group before and after the intervention, P < 0.05 for comparison between groups after the intervention.
Figure 4Comparative analysis of quality of life. #P < 0.05 for comparison within group before and after the intervention, P < 0.05 for comparison between groups after the intervention.