Zeng Jie Ye1, Hong Zhong Qiu2, Peng Fei Li3, Peng Chen3, Mu Zi Liang3, Mei Ling Liu4, Yuan Liang Yu2, Shu Ni Wang2, Xiao Ming Quan5. 1. The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; College of Economics and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. Electronic address: zengjieye@qq.com. 2. College of Economics and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. 3. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. 4. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. 5. Nursing Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. Electronic address: 1047052548@qq.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Parents of children diagnosed with cancer often experience considerable emotional distress for their children with negative emotions, such as disbelief, depression, anxiety, hope and shock. Resilience is defined as the psychological characteristics that promote positive adaptation in the face of stress and adversity, which has been demonstrated to relate to positive coping and less psychological distress. Thus, a quick screening tool to evaluate the levels of resilience of parents with cancer-diagnosed children is urgently required. METHODS: The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate the CD-RISC-10 using a sample size of 500 parents. Velicer's Minimum Average Partial (MAP) Test and a parallel analysis were also supplemented to confirm the EFA-derived structure of the scale. The participants were given the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) to test the associates with CD-RISC-10 and obtain the cut-off of the scale. RESULTS: The Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 has good psychometric properties and retains its single dimension in the original English version, which can explain 49.602% of the total variance. The CFA demonstrates the fit indices of a one-order model: Chi-Square = 39.987, CMIN/DF = 1.333, P < 0.001, TLI = 0.914, CFI = 0.981, GFI = 0.962, NFI = 0.926, IFI = 0.979, RFI = 0.889, RMR = 0.042, and RMSEA = 0.041. The CD-RISC presents statistical associations with other scales, and the cut-off is 25.5. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the CD-RISC-10, which is reliable, valid and easy to use, is suitable for clinical settings. The CD-RISC-10 enables a quick understanding of the level of resilience of the parents when their children undergo treatment, which can be the most important indicator to their psychological health.
PURPOSE: Parents of children diagnosed with cancer often experience considerable emotional distress for their children with negative emotions, such as disbelief, depression, anxiety, hope and shock. Resilience is defined as the psychological characteristics that promote positive adaptation in the face of stress and adversity, which has been demonstrated to relate to positive coping and less psychological distress. Thus, a quick screening tool to evaluate the levels of resilience of parents with cancer-diagnosed children is urgently required. METHODS: The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate the CD-RISC-10 using a sample size of 500 parents. Velicer's Minimum Average Partial (MAP) Test and a parallel analysis were also supplemented to confirm the EFA-derived structure of the scale. The participants were given the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ) to test the associates with CD-RISC-10 and obtain the cut-off of the scale. RESULTS: The Chinese version of CD-RISC-10 has good psychometric properties and retains its single dimension in the original English version, which can explain 49.602% of the total variance. The CFA demonstrates the fit indices of a one-order model: Chi-Square = 39.987, CMIN/DF = 1.333, P < 0.001, TLI = 0.914, CFI = 0.981, GFI = 0.962, NFI = 0.926, IFI = 0.979, RFI = 0.889, RMR = 0.042, and RMSEA = 0.041. The CD-RISC presents statistical associations with other scales, and the cut-off is 25.5. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the CD-RISC-10, which is reliable, valid and easy to use, is suitable for clinical settings. The CD-RISC-10 enables a quick understanding of the level of resilience of the parents when their children undergo treatment, which can be the most important indicator to their psychological health.
Authors: Zeng Jie Ye; Mu Zi Liang; Hao Wei Zhang; Peng Fei Li; Xue Ren Ouyang; Yuan Liang Yu; Mei Ling Liu; Hong Zhong Qiu Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mu Zi Liang; Ying Tang; M Tish Knobf; Alex Molassiotis; Peng Chen; Guang Yun Hu; Zhe Sun; Yuan Liang Yu; Zeng Jie Ye Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Yvonne Tran Bui; Matthew A Hathcock; Roberto P Benzo; Marie M Budev; Satish Chandrashekaran; David B Erasmus; Erika D Lease; Deborah J Levine; Karin L Thompson; Bradley K Johnson; Sheila G Jowsey-Gregoire; Cassie C Kennedy Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Filiberto Toledano-Toledano; José Moral de la Rubia; Laurie D McCubbin; Linda Liebenberg; Jesús Alejandro Vera Jiménez; Leonor Rivera-Rivera; Angie Hart; Leticia Andrea Barajas Nava; Marcela Salazar García; Silvia Martínez Valverde; Sofía Rivera Aragón; Concepción Sánchez Gómez; Laura Villavicencio Guzmán; Victor Granados García; Juan Garduño Espinosa Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Zeng Jie Ye; Mei Ling Liu; Zhang Zhang; Kun Lun Liao; Cai Fen Peng; Hui Huang; Yuan Liang Yu; Hong Zhong Qiu Journal: Int J Nurs Sci Date: 2017-06-03