| Literature DB >> 36033926 |
Lobna Saad Mohammed Abd Elmeged1, Magbolah Salem Helal Alzahrani2.
Abstract
The liver is more prone to infections that cause fibrosis, such as steatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatotoxicity, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Also, Viral hepatitis is a common condition worldwide it worsens into chronic inflammation of the liver. One of the healthiest fruits is the pomegranate for the body and health, as it contains a high nutritional value of minerals, vitamins, antioxidants, so we worked on this investigation to magnify the therapeutic applications of pomegranate fruits (POF) and peel (POP) in carbon tetrachloride-injected rats (Ccl4). The experiment was carried out in a caged animal. All rats were fed a basal diet for one week before the study, and they were divided into seven groups, each with six rats. As a control negative group (C-ve), the first group sample was fed only the basal diet for 28 days. The remaining rats (n = 36) were injected with carbon tetrachloride (Ccl4). Five groups were fed varying concentrations of (5 %, 10 %, 15 % POF, 5 %, and 10 % pomegranate peel (POP)), whereas one group was diagnosed with the illness and disease, and didn't even feed the experimental diet. The results revealed significant increases in T.BIL, D.BIL, and BIL in the serum of rats injected by CC14 to induce hepatopathy compared to the healthy group (normal rats). Also, the best treatment considering the serum D.BIL was recorded for the 5 % POF.Entities:
Keywords: (POF), pomegranate fruits; (POP), pomegranate peel; Carbon tetrachloride; Hepatocellular; Nutritional value; Pomegranate fruits and peel
Year: 2022 PMID: 36033926 PMCID: PMC9402388 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.052
The basic and experimental diets' compositions.
| – | 5 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | |
| 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | |
| 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Shows the (BWG g), (FER), and (FI g/d) for the negative control, positive control, and other different groups of hepatitis rats fed on POF and POP.
| Control (-) | 0.51 + 0.04193 a | 0.023 + 0.00253 a | 22.06 + 0.303 a |
| Control (+) | 0.11 ± 0.032 d | 0.010 + 0.001 d | 11.5 + 0.55 d |
| 5 % POF | 0.23 + 0.049c | 0.014 + 0.0025b | 16.9 + 0.25d c |
| 10 % POF | 0.20 + 0.025c | 0.013 + 0.0036b | 15.3 + 0.47c |
| 15 % POF | 0.30 ± 0.030b | 0.015 + 0.0015b | 20 + 0.4b |
| 5 % POP | 0.30 ± 0.025b | 0.014 + 0.0035b | 22 + 0.53 a |
| 10 %POP | 0.31 ± 0.026b | 0.016 + 0.003b | 19.1 + 0.56b |
| LSD | 0.059 | 0.004 | 0.787 |
Relative Organs Weight (g/100 g) for the negative control, positive control, and other groups of hepatitis rats fed on POF and POP.
| Control (-) | 2.5 ± 0.040d | 0.6 ± 0.1e | 0.3 ± 0.02f | 0.48 ± 0.05e | 0.23 ± 0.04 cd |
| Control (+) | 5.1 ± 0.3ab | 0.95 ± 0.05a | 0.79 ± 0.02a | 0.93 ± 0.03a | 0.49 ± 0.03a |
| 5 % POF | 4.5;0.5ab | 0.7 ± 0.01d | 0.63 ± 0.04c | 0.79 ± 0.02bc | 0.33 ± 0.04b |
| 10 % POF | 5.4 ± 0.45a | 0.83 ± 0.04b | 0.72 ± 0.02b | 0.84 ± 0.04b | 0.30 ± 0.0bc |
| 15 % POF | 2.6 ± 0.45d | 0.69 ± 0.2d | 0.48 ± 0.3d | 0.68 ± 0.03d | 0.20 ± 0.03d |
| 5 % POP | 2.4 ± 0.45d | 0.73 ± 0.04 cd | 0.4 ± 0.02e | 0.72 ± 0.03 cd | 02410.04 cd |
| 10 %POP | 3.6 ± 0.47c | 0.79 ± 0.03be | 0.63 ± 0.04c | 0.79 ± 0.03bc | 0.30 ± 0.03bc |
| LSD | 0.769 | 0.091 | 0.059 | 0.069 | 0.067 |
Values denote arithmetic + Standard deviation of the mean. Means with different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05, while those with similar letters are non-significant by different.
Effect of POF and POP on Liver Enzyme (AST, ALT, AST/ ALT, Alp) (U/L) of Hepatitis rats.
| Control (-) | 40.3 + 0.72* | 18.1 + 0.36* | 2 + 0.15b | 219.1 + 0.66 g |
| Control (+) | 77.4 + 0.453 | 29.1 + 0.453 | 2.8 + 0.153 | 394.3 + 0.43a |
| 5 % POF | 60.1 + 0.65° | 23.2 + 0.32c | 2.5 + 0.50ab | 320.6 + 0.58c |
| 10 % POF | 63.2 + 0.62b | 25.2 + 0.55b | 2.5 + 0.55ab | 324 + 0.45b |
| 15 % POF | 59.1 + 0.55d | 22.3 + 0.49d | 2.6 + 0.55ab | 315 + 032 ld ∼ |
| 5 % POP | 52.1 + 0.376 | 20.2 + 0.496 | 2.8 + 0.20ab | 290.2 + 0.626 |
| 10 %POP | 58.2 + 0.32d | 23.1 + 0.56c | 2.5 + 0.55ab | 230 + 0.45* |
| LSD | 0.959 | 0.825 | 0.741 | 0.906 |
Values denote arithmetic + Standard deviation of the mean. Means with different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05, while those with similar letters are non-significant by different.
Effects of POF and POP on Hepatitis-induced rat bilirubin levels (total, direct, and indirect (mg/dl)).
| Control (-) | 5.6 + 0.55b | 5.5 + 0.551* | 0.1 + 0.02° |
| Control (+) | 7.5 ± 0.4a | 7.2 + 0.453 | 0.41 + 0.363 |
| 5 % POF | 6.6 + 0.45ab | 6.3 + 0.47ab | 0.28 + 0.32b |
| 10 % POF | 6.5 ± 0.55ab | 6.2 + 0.47ab | 0.27 + 0.049b |
| 15 % POF | 6.3 + 0.47ab | 6.0 + 0.65abc | 0.32 + 0.25b |
| 5 % POP | 5.7 ± 0.66b | 5.4 + 0.30c | 0.29 + 0.015b |
| 10 %POP | 6.3 ± 0.45ab | 6.0 + 0.36abc | 0.3 + 0.01b • |
| LSD | 0.902 | 0.840 | 0.051 |
Values denote arithmetic + Standard deviation of the mean. Means with different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05, while those with similar letters are non-significant by different.
Effect of POF and POP on HDL, VLDL, LDL (mg/dI), and AI of Hepatitis rats.
| Control (-) | 12.1 ± 0.26e | 42.1 + 0.363 | 23.9 + 0.328 | 0.86 + 0.047° |
| Control (+) | 19.1 + 0.36* | 26.9 + 0.15* | 113.9 + 0.15a | 4.94 + 0.493 |
| 5 % POF | 17.2 + 0.32b | 34.4 + 0.45d | 70.4 + 0.36° | 2.55 + 0.25° |
| 10 % POF | 16.1 + 0.49° | 30.6 + 0.58° | 88.9 + 0.36b | 3.42 + 0.40b |
| 15 % POF | 15.6 + 0.5 ld | 36 + 0.1° | 34.4 + 0.45d | 1.39 + 0.026d |
| 5 % POP | 15.0 + 0.55° | 39.4 + 0.45b | 29.9 + 0.26* | 1.14 + 0.1d |
| 10 %POP | 16.6 + 0.32°d | 34.9 + 0.15d | 31.8 + 0.45° | 1.39 ± 0.036d ^ |
| LSD | 0.730 | 0.640 | 0.615 | 0.460 |
Values denote arithmetic + Standard deviation of the mean. Means with different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05, while those with similar letters are non-significant by different.
Effect of POF and POP on Kidney Function (Serum Creatinine, Serum Urea, and Serum Uric Acid) (mg/dl) of Hepatitis rats.
| Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Creatinine | Urea | Uric Acid | |
| Control (-) | 0.35 ± 0.035b | 16.4 ± 0.55 g | 1.7 ± 0.5b |
| Control (+) | 0.67 ± 0.02a | 34.6 ± 0.55a | 3.0 ± 0.15a |
| 5 % POF | 0.34 ± 0.04b | 27.3 ± 0.7c | 1.8 ± 0.3b |
| 10 % POF | 0.38 ± 0.03b | 28.3 ± 0.47b | l.9 ± 0.4b |
| 15 % POF | 0.33 ± 0.04b | 22.3 ± 0.50e | 1.6 ± 0.55b |
| 5 % POP | 0.31 ± 0.05c | 19.2 ± 0.61f | 1.5 ± 0.35b |
| 10 %POP | 0.34 ± 0.02b | 24.4 ± 0.45d | 1.7 ± 0.47b |
| LSD | 0.067 | 0.972 | 0.721 |
Values denote arithmetic + Standard deviation of the mean. Means with different letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05, while those with similar letters are non-significant by different.
Effect of POF and POP on glucose (mg/dl) of hepatopathy rats.
| Groups | Glucose. |
|---|---|
| Control (-) | 76.1 + 0.266 |
| Control (+) | 158.2 + 0.583 |
| 5 % POF | 82.2 + 0.73° |
| 10 % POF | 86.2 ± 0.73b |
| 15 % POF | 80.1 + 0.75d |
| 5 % POP | 70.1 + 0.56* |
| 10 %POP | 79.2 + 0.83d |
| LSD | 1.162 |
Values denote arithmetic + Standard deviation of the mean. Means with different letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05, while those with similar letters are non-significant by different.