Literature DB >> 17894607

Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescence.

Naomi P Friedman1, Brett C Haberstick, Erik G Willcutt, Akira Miyake, Susan E Young, Robin P Corley, John K Hewitt.   

Abstract

Attention problems (behavior problems including inattention, disorganization, impulsivity, and hyperactivity) are widely thought to reflect deficits in executive functions (EFs). However, it is unclear whether attention problems differentially relate to distinct EFs and how developmental stability and change predict levels of EFs in late adolescence. We investigated, in an unselected sample, how teacher-rated attention problems from ages 7 to 14 years related to three correlated but separable EFs, measured as latent variables at age 17. Attention problems at all ages significantly predicted later levels of response inhibition and working memory updating, and to some extent set shifting; the relation to inhibiting was stronger than the relations to the other EFs or IQ. Growth models indicated that attention problems were quite stable in this age range, and it was the initial levels of problems, rather than their changes across time, that predicted later EFs. These results support the hypothesis that attention problems primarily reflect difficulties with response inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17894607     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01997.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  62 in total

1.  Meditation and the Wandering Mind: A Theoretical Framework of Underlying Neurocognitive Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tracy Brandmeyer; Arnaud Delorme
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  Flexible rule use: common neural substrates in children and adults.

Authors:  Carter Wendelken; Yuko Munakata; Carol Baym; Michael Souza; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Executive control and dimensions of problem behaviors in preschool children.

Authors:  Kimberly Andrews Espy; Tiffany D Sheffield; Sandra A Wiebe; Caron A C Clark; Matthew J Moehr
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.982

4.  The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Naomi P Friedman
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-02

Review 5.  Major depressive disorder is associated with broad impairments on neuropsychological measures of executive function: a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Reliability and validity of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kevin R Krull; Gerard Gioia; Kirsten K Ness; Leah Ellenberg; Christopher Recklitis; Wendy Leisenring; Sujuan Huang; Marilyn Stovall; Leslie L Robison; Lonnie Zeltzer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin.

Authors:  Naomi P Friedman; Akira Miyake; Susan E Young; John C DeFries; Robin P Corley; John K Hewitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-05

8.  Costs and benefits linked to developments in cognitive control.

Authors:  Katharine A Blackwell; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-12-14

Review 9.  Serotonergic function, two-mode models of self-regulation, and vulnerability to depression: what depression has in common with impulsive aggression.

Authors:  Charles S Carver; Sheri L Johnson; Jutta Joormann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study.

Authors:  Naomi P Friedman; Akira Miyake; Lee J Altamirano; Robin P Corley; Susan E Young; Sally Ann Rhea; John K Hewitt
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.