Literature DB >> 16231998

The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic.

Nicole M Putnam1, Heidi J Hofer, Nathan Doble, Li Chen, Joseph Carroll, David R Williams.   

Abstract

High-resolution retinal imaging with adaptive optics was used to record the position of a light stimulus on the cone mosaic, with an error at least five times smaller than the diameter of the smallest foveal cones. We discuss the factors that limit the accuracy with which absolute retinal position can be determined. In five subjects, the standard deviation of fixation positions measured in discrete trials ranged from 2.1 to 6.3 arcmin, with an average of 3.4 arcmin (about 17 microm), in agreement with previous studies (R. W. Ditchburn, 1973; R. M. Steinman, G. M. Haddad, A. A. Skavenski, & D. Wyman, 1973). The center of fixation, based on the mean retinal position for each of three subjects, was displaced from the location of highest foveal cone density by an average of about 10 arcmin (about 50 microm), indicating that cone density alone does not drive the location on the retina selected for fixation. This method can be used in psychophysical studies or medical applications requiring submicron registration of stimuli with respect to the retina or in delivering light to retinal features as small as single cells.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16231998     DOI: 10.1167/5.7.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  80 in total

1.  The absolute threshold of cone vision.

Authors:  Darren Koenig; Heidi Hofer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Requirements for discrete actuator and segmented wavefront correctors for aberration compensation in two large populations of human eyes.

Authors:  Nathan Doble; Donald T Miller; Geunyoung Yoon; David R Williams
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera.

Authors:  Bai Xue; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Relationship between foveal cone structure and clinical measures of visual function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Kavitha Ratnam; Joseph Carroll; Travis C Porco; Jacque L Duncan; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Microscopic eye movements compensate for nonhomogeneous vision within the fovea.

Authors:  Martina Poletti; Chiara Listorti; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Imaging of vascular wall fine structure in the human retina using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Toco Y P Chui; Thomas J Gast; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope with integrated wide-field retinal imaging and tracking.

Authors:  R Daniel Ferguson; Zhangyi Zhong; Daniel X Hammer; Mircea Mujat; Ankit H Patel; Cong Deng; Weiyao Zou; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 8.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age.

Authors:  Hongxin Song; Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Zhangyi Zhong; Ann E Elsner; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  The significance of microsaccades for vision and oculomotor control.

Authors:  Han Collewijn; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.