Protocol for the MicroRESUS study: The impact of circulatory shock and resuscitation on microcirculatory function and mitochondrial respiration after cardiovascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite current resuscitation strategies, circulatory shock and organ injury after cardiac surgery occur in 25-40% of patients. Goal-directed resuscitation after cardiac surgery has generated significant interest, but clinical practice to normalize hemodynamic variables including mean arterial pressure, cardiac filling pressures, and cardiac output may not reverse microcirculation abnormalities and do not address cellular dysoxia. Recent advances in technology have made it possible to measure critical components of oxygen delivery and oxygen utilization systems in live human tissues and blood cells. The MicroRESUS study will be the first study to measure microcirculatory and mitochondrial function in patients with circulatory shock and link these findings with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a prospective, observational study that includes patients undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Microcirculation will be quantified with sublingual incident dark field videomicroscopy. Mitochondrial respiration will be measured by performing a substrate-uncoupler-inhibitor titration protocol with high resolution respirometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline and serial timepoints during resuscitation and at recovery as a possible liquid biomarker. Plasma samples will be preserved for future analysis to examine endothelial injury and other mechanisms of microcirculatory dysfunction. Thirty-day ventilator and vasopressor-free days (VVFDs) will be measured as a primary outcome, along with sequential organ failure assessment scores, and other clinical parameters to determine if changes in microcirculation and mitochondrial respiration are more strongly associated with clinical outcomes compared to traditional resuscitation targets. DISCUSSION: This will be the first prospective study to examine both microcirculatory and mitochondrial function in human patients with circulatory shock undergoing cardiac bypass and address a key mechanistic knowledge gap in the cardiovascular literature. The results of this study will direct future research efforts and therapeutic development for patients with shock.

Introduction

Despite current resuscitation practices, circulatory shock and perioperative organ injury after cardiac surgery occur in 25–40% of patients [1, 2]. Traditionally, causes of shock after cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are classified by macrocirculatory derangements (e.g. low cardiac output, vasoplegia, hypovolemia) [3]. Interventions to normalize hemodynamic variables, including mean arterial pressure, cardiac filling pressures, and cardiac output restore the large vessel (macrocirculatory) pressure and flow targets but may not reverse underrecognized disruptions in microcirculatory blood flow and oxygen utilization. Current methods to estimate the balance of oxygen delivery (DO2) relative to demand (VO2) include blood gas-derived calculations and the measurement of downstream biomarkers of anaerobic metabolism such as blood lactate. Using these methods, previous literature has concluded that lactic acidosis after cardiac surgery is unlikely related to inadequate oxygen delivery [4]. Unfortunately these inferences fail to consider the presence of regional blood flow derangements caused by pathologic microcirculatory heterogeneity, which are also associated with severity of postoperative lactic acidosis and organ injury [5, 6]. To resolve this important clinical discrepancy, a deeper understanding of the determinants of oxygen transport pathways and oxygen utilization during health, shock, and resuscitation are needed.

The microcirculation is composed of a network of vessels including arterioles, capillaries, and venules <100 μm in diameter where red blood cells (RBCs), leukocytes, and plasma components interface with the vascular endothelium to allow metabolic substrate exchange. Changes in microcirculatory blood flow can be caused by inflammatory-mediated vascular endothelial injury, microthrombosis, or an inadequate balance between vasoconstrictive and vasodilating agents leading to a global or heterogeneous reduction in capillary blood flow [7, 8]. Incident dark field (IDF) videomicroscopy is a novel, handheld method that can directly image the human microcirculation in real time. Current generation IDF videomicroscopy has improved imaging resolution compared to previous generation devices, and can detect up to 30% more capillaries compared to side stream imaging [9, 10]. As a result, important determinants of tissue oxygenation, such as microcirculatory diffusive and convective properties, can now be more accurately quantified.

Blood gas derived calculations of VO2/DO2 balance may provide false clinical reassurance as they cannot identify microvascular injury, microvascular shunting, and other mechanisms of dysoxia which may contribute to cell injury and organ dysfunction in patients with shock [11]. Advancements in high resolution respirometry now make it possible to quantify mitochondrial respiration rapidly and reliably in live tissues [12]. Nucleated blood cells (platelets and peripheral blood mononuclear cells) are readily accessible and can be used as surrogates to study cellular respiration in acute care illnesses such as acute heart failure, hemorrhagic shock, sepsis, and patients with ischemic reperfusion injury [13-15]. It is unclear if deficiencies in oxygen delivery and utilization occur independently or concomitantly in patients with shock. Studies that simultaneously examine mitochondrial respiration and microcirculatory function, which are also tied to clinical outcomes, are vitally important to guide future research efforts in therapeutic development and perform effective interventional trials.

Materials and methods

Study objective

The primary objective of the MicroRESUS study is to evaluate the microcirculatory and mitochondrial function in patients following elective cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, to determine if these parameters outperform traditional biomarkers and global hemodynamic measurements to predict clinical outcomes.

Study design and setting

This is a prospective, observational, single center study with repeated measures from baseline through 30-days after surgery at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Patient screening

Patients will be screened 24–48 hours prior to surgery using the published operative schedule. First-case elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valvular surgeries will be considered for study enrollment, pending availability of research personnel to complete the study protocol. Efforts will be made to diversify subject enrollment to accurately reflect the general cardiovascular patient population.

Informed consent

Patients will be approached for consent by telephone one day prior to surgery or in person while in the preoperative area on the day of surgery. Consent will be obtained by the Principal Investigator or trained research personnel. Patient signatures will be obtained digitally via the REDcap data management system [16]. A digital copy of the consent form will be sent to the patient in addition to being retained by the study team.

Sample size and power

Using data from our previous foundational work as well as unpublished pilot data, we anticipate a 1:1 allocation of patients to the high (PVD > 22mm/mm2) and low group (PVD ≤ 22 mm/mm2). We will need a sample size of at least 134 subjects to detect at least a 2-day difference in ventilator and vasopressor-free days (VVFDs) with a β = 0.8, using a one-sided t-test α = 0.05 [5, 6]. We will enroll a total of 140 subjects to allow for a 5% loss to follow-up (surgical delay, ICU delay, cancelled surgery, etc.) and exclusion due inadequate microcirculation video quality (S1 Appendix).

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients (≥18 years old) receiving elective CABG or valvular surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass are eligible for enrollment. Post-operative patients with circulatory shock will be identified by having:

Either vasopressor-dependent hypotension or low cardiac output requiring inotropic support

Signs of end-organ injury or impaired tissue perfusion defined by one of the following criteria:

Normothermic patients with a capillary refill time > 3 seconds

Serum lactate > 2 mmol/dL

Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) < 60%

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded if they are unable to tolerate sublingual microcirculatory flow imaging (e.g., non-intubated patients dependent upon oxygen by facemask, poor mouth opening), receiving an emergent procedure, have an active malignancy, or mitochondrial disorder.

Timeline and techniques for data collection

Data for each subject will be collected at time points outlined in Fig 1. Prior to surgery, baseline biologic samples, microcirculation imaging, and clinical data will be obtained. Repeated measurements will be obtained in the ICU and surgical floor. Long-term clinical outcomes will be recorded at 30-days or upon discharge.

Fig 1

Timeline of data collection.

Demographic and resuscitation data

Demographic values including age, gender, and ethnicity will be recorded. Preoperative risk scores including the STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) mortality score and euroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) will be calculated. Intraoperative data including cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross clamp time, blood product use, intravenous fluid administration, and vasoactive administration will be recorded. ICU clinical data (hemodynamics, laboratory testing, etc.), resuscitation data (intravenous fluids, vasoactive administration, blood transfusion, etc.), and clinical outcomes (VVFDs, ICU length of stay, hospital LOS, etc.) will be recorded as indicated in Fig 1. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores will be calculated prior to surgery (baseline), as well as 24 and 72 hours after surgery.

Physiologic and pharmacologic data

Systemic hemodynamic data, perfusion data, and blood gas measurements will be collected upon ICU admission, then hourly during the first 6 hours of postoperative care. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) will be monitored continuously using a pulmonary artery catheter (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA, USA). Arterial blood pressure will be measured using a standard invasive arterial line. Intraoperative and post-operative administration of blood products, intravenous fluids, vasoactive agents (vasopressor and inotropes), and sedatives will be recorded at each time point.

Incident dark field microscopy

Sublingual microcirculation imaging will be performed using handheld incident dark field (IDF) videomicroscopy (CytoCam, Braedius Medical BV, the Netherlands) at four time points during the enrollment period. Imaging will be performed by the Principal Investigator or trained research personnel. Video sequences are obtained by placing the CytoCam device should sublingual space and maneuvered so that pressure and motion do not result in image artifact (Fig 2). A series of successive video clips (3–5 clips of at least 120 frames or 6 seconds in length) should be captured in distinct areas of the sublingual space to account for vessel heterogeneity. Focus and lighting during video capture may be adjusted to optimize image acquisition. Baseline (T0h) imaging will be obtained in the preoperative area prior to surgery on the day of the scheduled operation. Repeated measurements will be obtained upon arrival to the ICU (0–2 hours after surgery, T2h), during ongoing resuscitation (2–4 hours post-op, T4h), and on post-operative day one after recovery (T24h).

Fig 2

A. Experimental setup with patient in supine position during IDF measurement. B. Anatomical sublingual triangle where measurements are obtained.

Analysis of IDF videomicroscopy

Prior to analysis, video quality will be assessed using the 6-factor Massey quality score, which uses a semiquantitative assessment of each video for appropriate illumination, duration, focus, content, stability, and pressure. Only videos with Massey scores of <10 will be included for further analysis [17]. Three videos with the best quality score will be selected for further processing. All IDF images will be coded then analyzed using an offline, dedicated software (Automated Vascular Analysis v3.02, Microvision Medical, The Netherlands). Microvascular flow index (MFI), microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI), total vessel density (TVD), proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), and perfused vessel density (PVD). Individual microvessel flow will be scored as 0 = no flow, 1 = intermittent flow, 2 = sluggish flow, or 3 = continuous flow. Vessels will be considered perfused if they are scored as either sluggish or continuous flow. To ensure only vessels contributing to tissue gas exchange and metabolism are included, only vessels < 20 μm in diameter will be analyzed. This process follows the current standard for microcirculation measurement and analysis [18]. Interobserver variation will be tested periodically in at least 10% of the subject videos to ensure minimal scoring heterogeneity between investigators.

Biological samples

Blood gas samples will be drawn into a commercial, pre-heparinized 1 mL blood sampler then immediately analyzed by an ABL90 FLEX automatic blood gas analyzer (Radiometer America Inc., Brea, California, USA). Arterial blood gas samples will be obtained by clinical staff every 1–2 hours for the first 6 hours after ICU admission based on current clinical practice. Central venous blood gas measurements will also be obtained by the study team at the time of microcirculation measurement. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, pH, PaO2, PaCO2, and glucose are also reported on each blood gas analysis. After 6 hours, blood gas analysis will be performed as needed by the clinical team. For biomarker and mitochondrial function analysis, enrolled patients will undergo phlebotomy with volumes of 15 mL drawn into K2EDTA tubes. Blood samples will then be centrifuged at room temperature using Ficoll-PaqueTM PLUS (GE) and Leucosep tubes (Greiner Bio-one). Plasma specimens will be stored at -80°C for later evaluation of the mechanisms of microcirculatory dysfunction. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) will undergo further analysis and processing as detailed below.

Mitochondrial respiration

A population of PBMCs will be obtained and analyzed from the plasma buffy coat within 1 hour of blood draw. A cell count and viability will be calculated using the Cell Countess II (Invitrogen) with trypan blue exclusion. Between 4–5 x 106 PBMCs will be used for respiration analysis and residual PBMCs will be processed and stored at-80°C for future quantitative PCR. Unless otherwise specified, all reagents will be obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and Invitrogen.

Mitochondrial respiration will be analyzed using an Oroboros O2k-FluoRespirometer (Oroboros Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria) with a substrate–uncoupler–inhibitor titration (SUIT) protocol and MiR05 buffer [19]. The SUIT protocol measures oxidative phosphorylation capacity with electron flow through complex I (CI) and complex II (CI + CII) using malate, pyruvate, glutamate, and flavin adenine dinucleotide-linked substrate succinate in the presence of adenosine diphosphate. The addition of digitonin allows for the measurement of specific complex-linked activity. Oligomycin, an inhibitor of the ATP synthase, uncouples respiration from ATP-synthase activity to measure respiration where the O2 consumption is dependent on the leakiness the mitochondrial membrane and back-flux of protons into the mitochondrial matrix independent of ATP synthase (LEAKCI+CII). Maximal convergent non-phosphorylating respiration of ETSCI+CII is evaluated by titrating the protonophore, carbonyl cyanide p-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone. ETSCI+CII is considered a stress test for mitochondria, a marker of mitochondrial respiratory reserve. Non-phosphorylating respiration specifically through CII (ETSCII) is achieved through the addition of rotenone, an inhibitor of CI. The complex III (CIII) inhibitor antimycin-A is added to measure the residual non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption, and this value is subtracted from each of the measured respiratory states to provide only mitochondrial respiration. Complex IV (CIV)-linked respiration will be measured by the addition of ascorbate with N,N,N,N-tetramethyl-phenylenediamine. The CIV inhibitor sodium azide will be added to reveal the chemical background that is subtracted from the N,N,N,N-tetramethyl-phenylenediamine-induced oxygen consumption rate. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production will be measured using the Amplex UltraRed method [20]. All data will be acquired using DatLab 7 (Oroboros Instruments, Innsbruck, Austria) and respiration value will be normalized to cell count.

Outcome measures

Our hypothesis is that patients with poor post-operative sublingual functional capillary density (defined as a PVD < 22 mm/mm2 and MHI > 0.4) will have a higher degree of postoperative cardiovascular and pulmonary organ injury compared to patients with normal postoperative microcirculation. The primary outcome for this study will be VVFDs during the first 30 days after surgery. This outcome was chosen because our elective cardiac surgery patients are managed using early recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, with a goal to be extubated and weaned off vasopressors within 24 hours after surgery [21, 22]. VVFDs will be calculated as a reverse count of consecutive days without requiring ICU-level respiratory or vasopressor support (Fig 3). Our research group has used a similar primary outcome in a previous clinical trial [23]. The day of operation (day zero) will not be included as all patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with CPB require mechanical ventilation and vasoactive medications on the day of surgery. Ventilator days will include mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy, high-flow nasal cannula ≥ 40 liters/minute with an FiO2 > 40%, or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation not prescribed at home. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation and HFNC will be included as these both require the patient to remain in our ICU. Vasoactives include epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, dobutamine, or milrinone at any dose. Subjects in need of respiratory or vasopressor support on day 30, or die before day 30 will be assigned zero VVFDs. If the patient is discharged prior to hospital day 30 a “last status carried forward” approach will be used. Secondary outcomes will include sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on day 1, day 3, diagnosis of acute kidney injury (defined as an increse in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 2 days), and hospital length of stay.

Fig 3

Examples of VVFD scenarios to determine clinical outcomes.

Exploratory outcomes will examine the relationship of microcirculatory function with common clinical biomarkers such as lactate, SvO2, venous-to-arterial PCO2 gap, capillary refill time, and lactate to pyruvate ratio. Markers of endothelial injury and inflammation such as soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), e-selectin, IL-8, IL-10, and other inflammatory cytokines will be measured. We will also examine mitochondrial complex function in human blood cells, comparing individual complex (I, II, III, and IV) function and reactive oxygen species generation between patients with and without post-operative shock.

Safety considerations

The Principal Investigator will be primarily responsible for the study conduction throughout protocol completion. Research personnel will be required to report any relevant protocol deviations or research related adverse events to the Principal Investigator. Risks associated with sublingual IDF imaging are low and no identifiable adverse events have been previously linked to sublingual IDF imaging.

Statistical and analysis plans

Continuous variables characterizing demographical data, microcirculation data, and mitochondrial respiration measurements, and outcomes data will be reported as means with standard deviations if normally distributed or medians with interquartile ranges if not normally distributed. Categorical variables will be represented as frequencies and proportions. To examine the predictive performance of selected variables for the primary outcome, we will construct receiver operator characteristic curves for threshold values of PVD, MHI, lactate, SvO2, mean arterial pressure, and cardiac index. A Youden index will be calculated to determine the best cutoff value for determining prolonged VVFDs.

Linear regression modeling will be used to examine the relationship between L/P ratio and postoperative microcirculation variables. We will perform univariate analyses on candidate predictor variables of L/P ratio including PVD, MHI, LFTs, creatinine, CPB time, cross clamp time, and catecholamine administration. Multiple linear regression analysis will be used to model the effect of significant predictors. Repeated measure ANOVA will be used to compare changes in microcirculatory variables, mitochondrial respiration, and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production over time. To adjust for multiple comparisons, post-hoc pairwise Tukey Kramer t-tests will be performed. All analyses will use statistical software (SAS version 15.1, Cary, NC; Prism v 9.0, Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA).

Data storage and management

All clinical and research related data will be recorded on study specific case report forms (CRFs) kept in the possession of the Principal Investigator. Data will be transferred to the secure HIPAA-compliant online clinical research database tool, REDCap (REDCap, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) [24]. Subject data will be deidentified and only accessible by appropriate research personnel. All biological samples will be identifiable only by study subject code, and after analysis is complete the samples will be disposed.

Ethics and dissemination

This study is approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (IRB # 829765) and informed consent will be obtained prior to enrollment. The dataset supporting the results of this study will be available in the Zenodo research data repository. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov at NCT05330676.

Status and timeline of the study

Initial pilot testing, staff education, and laboratory calibration testing began recruitment of the participants began on September 1, 2020. The study is actively enrolling subjects at the time of this publication. Preliminary analysis of microcirculation images, mitochondrial respiration, and VVFDs will be conducted in 2022.

Discussion

Goal-directed resuscitation strategies have improved postoperative clinical outcomes over the past two decades, but many patients continue to experience significant morbidity including multiorgan dysfunction after cardiac surgery [25]. The evolution of previous technologies has made it possible to evaluate real-time microcirculatory function and perform rapid analysis of mitochondrial respiration in critically ill adults, which make it possible to explore alternative mechanisms of organ injury not addressed by current resuscitation practices.

It is not fully known if there is a discordance between macrocirculatory hemodynamic targets and microcirculatory blood flow, as this has only been shown in studies with a generally small sample size. Of particular interest will be early differences in microcirculatory and mitochondrial function in patients with and without post-operative shock. In order to improve outcomes of these critically ill patients and prevent unnecessary perioperative morbidity, examination of mechanisms not addressed by standard resuscitation practices must be explored.

We recognize that there may be some limitations to using the sublingual site to estimate global microcirculatory function and PBMCs to estimate of global mitochondrial function in a diverse, clinical patient population. To minimize differences between patients, we plan to match patient groups for comorbidities such as diabetes, coronary artery disease, and medications that could depress mitochondrial function. The sublingual microcirculation is embryologically related to the gastrointestinal tract, and has been correlated with splanchnic circulation which is one of the most significant lactate producers during shock [26]. Additionally, PBMCs have been found to correlate with renal and cardiac mitochondrial function in hemorrhagic shock [14]. Our team has shown that PBMC mitochondrial ROS (mROS) track closely with brain tissue mROS in an ischemia-reperfusion model) [15]. This supports the concept of using sublingual microcirculation and PBMCs to reflect global injury.

The MicroRESUS study will be the first to simultaneously examine two underrecognized, discrete causes of cellular hypoxia in human subjects with shock with consideration of important clinical outcomes. This study will address a critical gap in the literature, by simultaneously measuring microcirculatory and mitochondrial function in patients with shock and tying our findings to important clinical outcomes. Results from this study will guide future research efforts to identify, develop, and design novel therapies and interventional trials to reverse unrecognized physiologic derangements after cardiovascular surgery.

Power calculations and determination of sample size.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

18 Jul 2022

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jeffrey S Isenberg, MD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“Abramson 412 Emergency Medicine & Critical Care Research Fund”

We note that you have provided additional information within the Acknowledgements Section that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. Please note that funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“JCG is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, award number KL2TR001879. DHJ is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, award number K08HL136858. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Website: https://www.nih.gov/grants-funding

The sponsors will not play any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

4. One of the noted authors is a group or consortium “The MicroRESUS Investigator Group”. In addition to naming the author group, please list the individual authors and affiliations within this group in the acknowledgments section of your manuscript. Please also indicate clearly a lead author for this group along with a contact email address.

5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

The authors are requested to make a number of changes in the manuscript. Of note, the study began several years ago. Can a reason be provided in the text for why the present manuscript was not developed and submitted sooner?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for this great study protocol article. I only wonder if measurements are also to be done during the operation since predominantly the start of CPB may be associated with microcirculatory derangement (Den Uil et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008). Good luck!

Reviewer #2: The authors provided a study protocol for microcirculatory assessment in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. As the restoration of tissue perfusion is the primary goal of hemodynamic therapy, the study is of high interest. However, I have some questions and concerns about the manuscript and the study design:

1) The title of the study implies that you will investigate patients with shock. However, the inclusion criteria used do not include a marker for shock or hemodynamic instability. I think, only the minority of the included patients will suffer from shock. Please provide how shock will be defined in the study. What percentage of patients in your hospital develop shock during elective cardiac surgery procedures?

2) As primary endpoint you plan to use ventilator and vasopressor-free days. Further, you state the hypothesis that patients with poor post-operative microcirculatory function will have a higher degree of postoperative organ injury compared to patients with normal postoperative microcirculation. If you want to test this hypothesis, why do you not use a score for organ failure as the primary endpoint? Which parameters and cut-off values do you use to differentiate between normal and poor microcirculation?

3) In the statistics section you write "Continuous variables characterizing each study group will be reported as means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges.". Which groups?

4) You used a 2-day difference in ventilator and vasopressor-free days for sample size calculation. Which groups and what group sizes did you assume for this?

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

27 Jul 2022

Hello! We are thankful for the opportunity to resubmit our study protocol. We have made edits to our manuscript document and outlined each change in the, "Response to Reviewers" document. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks!

- John Greenwood

Submitted filename: PLOS One MicroRESUS Protocol Revisions.docx

Click here for additional data file.

8 Aug 2022

Protocol for the MicroRESUS study: The impact of circulatory shock and resuscitation on microcirculatory function and mitochondrial respiration after cardiovascular surgery.

PONE-D-22-12392R1

Dear Dr. Greenwood,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jeffrey S Isenberg, MD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The Reviewers found that the revised manuscript draft addressed their concerns. The authors are thanked for the additional effort.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for your answer to my comment.

In my opinion, the authors satisfactorily answered my question.

Reviewer #2: Microcirculatory monitoring is not available in clinical routine so far. Therefore the study is of high interest. The methody have been sufficiently described to replicate the investigation. The revision improved the manuscript, so the objectives of the study are now comprehensible and achievable with the methods used. Thank you my questions have been answered adequately.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

11 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-12392R1

Protocol for the MicroRESUS study: The impact of circulatory shock and resuscitation on microcirculatory function and mitochondrial respiration after cardiovascular surgery.

Dear Dr. Greenwood:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jeffrey S Isenberg

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE