Elnazeer O Ahmed1, Ron Butler2, Richard J Novick3. 1. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. 2. Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: rjnovick@uwo.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue, which is defined as the probability of death after a complication that was not present on admission, was introduced as a quality measure in the 1990s, to complement mortality and morbidity outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate possible incremental benefits of measuring failure to rescue after cardiac surgery, to facilitate quality improvement efforts. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 4,978 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac operations during a 5-year period. Institutional logistic regression models were used to generate predicted rates of mortality and major complications. Frequency distributions of morbidities were determined, and failure to rescue was calculated. The annual failure-to-rescue rates were contrasted using χ(2) tests and compared with morbidity and mortality measures. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 3.6%, the total complication rate was 16.8%, and the failure-to-rescue rate was 19.8% (95% confidence interval, 17.1% to 22.7%). The predicted risk of mortality and of major complications increased during the last 2 years of the study, whereas the observed complication rate decreased. Failure to rescue for new renal failure was the highest of all complications (48.4%), followed by septicemia (42.6%). Despite the decreased complication rate toward the end of the study, the failure-to-rescue rate did not change significantly (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Failure to rescue should be monitored as a quality-of-care metric, in addition to mortality and complication rates. Postoperative renal failure and septicemia still have a high failure-to-rescue rate and should be targeted by quality improvement efforts.
BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue, which is defined as the probability of death after a complication that was not present on admission, was introduced as a quality measure in the 1990s, to complement mortality and morbidity outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate possible incremental benefits of measuring failure to rescue after cardiac surgery, to facilitate quality improvement efforts. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 4,978 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac operations during a 5-year period. Institutional logistic regression models were used to generate predicted rates of mortality and major complications. Frequency distributions of morbidities were determined, and failure to rescue was calculated. The annual failure-to-rescue rates were contrasted using χ(2) tests and compared with morbidity and mortality measures. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 3.6%, the total complication rate was 16.8%, and the failure-to-rescue rate was 19.8% (95% confidence interval, 17.1% to 22.7%). The predicted risk of mortality and of major complications increased during the last 2 years of the study, whereas the observed complication rate decreased. Failure to rescue for new renal failure was the highest of all complications (48.4%), followed by septicemia (42.6%). Despite the decreased complication rate toward the end of the study, the failure-to-rescue rate did not change significantly (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Failure to rescue should be monitored as a quality-of-care metric, in addition to mortality and complication rates. Postoperative renal failure and septicemia still have a high failure-to-rescue rate and should be targeted by quality improvement efforts.
Authors: Jennifer J Chung; Emily C Earl-Royal; M Kit Delgado; Jose L Pascual; Patrick M Reilly; Douglas J Wiebe; Daniel N Holena Journal: Am Surg Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: G Barmparas; E J Ley; M J Martin; A Ko; M Harada; D Weigmann; K R Catchpole; B L Gewertz Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Lucy W Ma; Justin S Hatchimonji; Elinore J Kaufman; Catherine E Sharoky; Brian P Smith; Daniel N Holena Journal: Surgery Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Lindsay E Kuo; Elinore Kaufman; Rebecca L Hoffman; Jose L Pascual; Niels D Martin; Rachel R Kelz; Daniel N Holena Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Elizabeth Warnack; Hersch Leon Pachter; Beatrix Choi; Charles DiMaggio; Spiros Frangos; Michael Klein; Marko Bukur Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2019-09-26
Authors: John C Greenwood; Fatima M Talebi; David H Jang; Audrey E Spelde; Todd J Kilbaugh; Frances S Shofer; Michael A Acker; John G T Augoustides; Jan Bakker; Nuala J Meyer; Jacob S Brenner; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Benjamin S Abella Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 3.752