| Literature DB >> 36018000 |
Kinga Piorecka1, Jan Kurjata1, Wlodzimierz A Stanczyk1.
Abstract
Acriflavine (ACF) has been known for years as an antibacterial drug. The identification of key oncogenic mechanisms has brought, in recent years, a significant increase in studies on ACF as a multipurpose drug that would improve the prognosis for cancer patients. ACF interferes with the expression of the hypoxia inducible factor, thus acting on metastatic niches of tumors and significantly enhancing the effects of other anticancer therapies. It has been recognized as the most potent HIF-1 inhibitor out of the 336 drugs approved by the FDA. This work presents up-to-date knowledge about the mechanisms of action of ACF and its related prodrug systems in the context of anticancer and SARS-CoV-2 inhibitory properties. It explains the multitask nature of this drug and suggests mechanisms of ACF's action on the coronavirus. Other recent reports on ACF-based systems as potential antibacterial and antiviral drugs are also described.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36018000 PMCID: PMC9469206 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Chem ISSN: 0022-2623 Impact factor: 8.039
Figure 1Chemical structure of acriflavine (ACF).
Endogenous Regulators of Angiogenesis
| activators | inhibitors |
|---|---|
| VEGF – vascular endothelial growth factor family | IL-10 – interleukin-10 |
| aFGF, bFGF – acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors | IL-12 – interleukin-12 |
| TGF-β – transforming growth factor β | TIMP – tissue inhibitor metalloprotease |
| TNF-α – tumor necrosis factor α | PAI-1 – prasminogen activator-inhibitor-1 |
| PDGF – plated-delivered endothelial growth factor | zinc |
| HGF – hepatocyte growth factor | Ang2 – angiopoietin-2 |
| placental growth factor | angiotensin |
| GM-CSF – granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor | AT2 – angiotensin-2 |
| angiogenin | CAV-1, CAV-2 – caveolin- and -2 |
| IL-1 – interleukin-1 | endostatin |
| IL-6 – interleukin-6 | INF-α – interferon-α |
| IL-8 – interleukin-8 | platerat factor 4 |
| cathepsin | |
| MMP9 – matrix metallopeptidase 9 | |
| copper | |
| CD51/CD61 antibodies – alpha 5 beta 3 integrin angiopoitin-1 | |
| AT1 – angiotensin-1 | |
| endothelin | |
| erythropoietin | |
| HIF-1α – hypoxia-inducing factor | |
| NO – nitric oxide | |
| plated-activating factor | |
| PGE – prostaglandin E |
Figure 2Morphological and physiological changes associated with the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Reprinted with permission from ref (60). Copyright 2017 Springer Nature.
Figure 3Acriflavine (ACF) strongly changes gene expression. (A, B) Heatmaps of RNA-seq after treatment of HUVECs with ACF. (C) Volcano plot of RNA-seq after treatment of HUVECs with ACF. (D) Chromosomal distribution and percentage of protein-coding genes up- or downregulated with ACF. (E) Correlation analysis of protein-coding genes up- or downregulated with ACF of HUVECs and murine lung endothelial cells. (F) Venn diagram. (G) Number of protein-coding genes up- or downregulated with ACF. (H) GO enrichment analysis with KOBAS2.0. (I) deeptools2: overlaying the RNA-seq reads with the transcription start sites of all genes. Reprinted with permission from ref (11). Copyright 2022 The Authors. Published Open Access by Elsevier under a Creative Commons CC BY license.
Anti-cancer Effect of Acriflavine on Selected Tumorsa
| tumor | cell lines/mice | material/dose | results | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10%, 25%, and 50% ACF in ACF:CPP:SA | • local ACF therapy: CPP:SA improves survival | ( | ||
| • the optimal dose of ACF is 25% in combination with the polymer CPP:SA | ||||
| • greater efficiency of local ACF delivery compared to systemic administration | ||||
| 2.5 μM | • | ( | ||
| • | ||||
| • | ||||
| • ACF inhibits CML stem cells that are not susceptible to traditional treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors | ( | |||
| • ACF may prevent CML recurrences | ||||
| primary cells of a CML patient | ||||
| ACF-SLN (ACF DL = 31.25 ± 4.21 mg/mL), 0–14 μM | • ACF-SLN showed a stable cytotoxic effect after 48 h, inducing greater apoptosis compared to the free drug | ( | ||
| • ACF acts through the caspase-3 activation pathway | ( | |||
| • ACF reduces tumor
size | ||||
| PMONA NPs (microporous silica with cisplatin and ACF) | •
ACF increases the anti-tumor efficacy of cisplatin | ( | ||
| • PMONA loaded with two drugs had a stronger anti-cancer effect than nanoparticles loaded with one drug | ||||
| PMONA (2 mg cisplatin/kg) DL (% ACF) = 3.2 ± 1.2 | ||||
| • ACF acts through the caspase-3 activation pathway | ( | |||
| • inhibits the viability of HCC cell lines in a dose-dependent manner | ||||
| • inhibits the growth of neoplastic
cells | ||||
| Nonoplatforma: ACF@PCN-222@MnO2-PEG | • enhancement of PDT | ( | ||
| primary tumor cell cultures from patients | • ACF is more active against CRC (IC50 = 1.38 μM) than against OC (IC50 = 4.23 μM) and CLL (IC50 = 2.58 μM) | ( | ||
| • ACF is an inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II | ||||
| mice Balb/C | • ACF reduces vascularity growth and tumor progression | ( | ||
| • ACF acts on HIF-1 | ||||
| SW480, HCT116, LS174T | • ACF enhances the effect of 5-fluorouracil better than irinotecan | ( | ||
| • it exhibits a different mechanism than the suppression of HIF-1α and topoisomerase II expression (their levels were unchanged) | ||||
| DOX-ACF@Lipo (encapsulated DOX and ACF in liposomes) | • DOX-ACF@Lipo cellular uptake is dependent | ( | ||
| • a better therapeutic effect was achieved by DOX-ACF@Lipo at different concentrations compared to DOX@Lipo | ||||
| • | ||||
| ACF@MnO2 | • ACF@MnO2 can reduce cell viability more effectively than free acriflavin or free MnO2 in the presence of X-rays, significantly less metastasis in the liver was observed | ( | ||
| i.v. injection, 3 mg/kg/14 days | • ACF@MnO2 can effectively suppress the expression of metastatic proteins (VEGF and MMP-9) | |||
| MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435 | • ACF acts on HIF-1 by reducing the expression of LOX and LOXL proteins (responsible for metastasis), destroying metastatic niches of breast cancer | ( | ||
| mice with MDA-435 | ||||
| mouse breast cancer cells (4T1 cells) | CSP-ACF nanoparticles | • very low drug concentration (5 μg /mL) in the form of CSP nanoparticles can lead to apoprosis of more than 60% of cancer cells | ( | |
| • ACF alleviates hypoxia and makes a patient more sensitive to radiotherapy | ||||
| • CSP-ACF nanoparticles lead to a decrease in VEGF, fewer tumor microvessels and more cell apoptosis | ||||
| ACF-LNC | • higher efficiency of ACF-LNC compared to free ACF | ( | ||
| • the use of ACF-LNC allowed
reduction of the number
of administrations compared to free ACF (from 12 to 2 injections) | ||||
| mice BALB/c with 4T1 | • ACF increases the antitumor activity of sunitinib, lowers the expression of VEGF and TGF-β, and reduces tumor vascularization, leading to its apoptosis | ( | ||
| B16-F10 and 4T1 | 5, 10, 20, and 30 μM | • ACF improved the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy in combination therapy with TRP-2 and anti-PD-1 antibody | ( | |
| SK-MEL-28, IGR37, and B16/F10 murine melanoma cells | • ACF induces melanoma cell death under conditions of normoxia | ( | ||
| • ACF disrupts glucose metabolism by down-regulating PDK1 | ||||
| • inhibits the phosphorylation of AKT and RSK2 | ||||
| • targets the activation of transcription factor 4 (ATF4) | ||||
| • inhibits the expression of the transcription factor MITF (the factor responsible for the acts of induction of HIF-1 transcription) | ||||
| SK-ChA-1 | • liposomal ACF sensitizes tumor cells to PDT | ( | ||
| • ACF inhibits HIF-1 and topoisomerases I and II | ||||
| A431 | • action of free or liposomal ACF improves the efficacy of PDT | ( | ||
| MG63 | • ACF (0–10 μM) inhibits the growth of osteosarcoma cells in a dose-dependent manner | ( | ||
| • ACF induces tumor apoptosis via both HIF-1α-dependent and HIF-1α-independent pathways | ||||
Abbreviations used: F98, 9L, GL261, and U87, human glioma cell lines; BTSCs, human primary brain tumor stem cells; CPP:SA, biodegradable polyanhydride poly(1,3-bis[p-carboxyphenoxy]propane-co-sebacic acid); Panc-1, human pancreatic cancer cells; THP-1, human monocytic cell line; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; PDTX, human PDAC xenografts: PAC006 (classical type, moderately differentiated and slow progression) and PAC010 (quasi-mesenchymal type, poorly differentiated and faster growth); K562, human erythroleukemic cell line; KCL22, human myeloid leukemia cell line; LAMA-84, human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line; HEK293T, human embryonic kidney 293 cells; NIH/3T3, cell lines of mouse embryonic fibroblasts; CML, myeloid leukemia; A549, adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells; ACF-SLN, solid lipid nanoparticles containing ACF; PMONA, cisplatin microporous organosilica nanoparticles with ACF; Mahlavu, SK-Hep1, Hep3B, Huh-7, and PLC/PRF/5, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; HeLa, epitheloid cervical carcinoma; SW480, human colon adenocarcinoma; HCT116, human colon cancer cell line; LS174T, human intestinal cell line; DOX, doxorubicin; CT26, murine colorectal carcinoma cell line; 4T1, breast cancer cell line; VEGF, vascular endotherial growth factor; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435-human breast adenocarcinoma; LOX, lysyl oxidase proteins; LOXL, lysyl oxidase-like proteins; CSP, Cu2-Se@PtSe, type of yolk–shell nanosensitizer; ACF-LNC, lipid nanocapsules containing acriflavine; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; B16-F10, mouse melanoma cells; TRP-2, tyrosinase-related protein-2; PD-1, programmed death receptor 1; SK-MEL-28 and IGR37, human melanoma cells; PDK1, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1; AKT, protein kinase; RSK2, serine/threonine kinase ribosomal S6 kinase 2; ATF4, activating transcription factor 4; MITF, microphthalmia-associated transcription factor; SK-ChA-1, human cholangiocarcinoma cells; A431, squamous carcinom cell line; MG63, human osteosarcoma cell line; i.p., intraperitoneal; i.v., intravenous.
Figure 4Diagram of ACF action in photodynamic therapy. Reprinted with permission from ref (86). Copyright 2016 Springer Nature.
Figure 5Scheme of the synthesis of the ACF@PCN-222@MnO2-PEG nanoplatform and its anticancer activity in photodynamic therapy. Reprinted with permission from ref (76). Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 6Use of the ACF@MnO2 nanoplatform to enhance radiotherapy. Reprinted with permission from ref (92). Copyright 2018 ACS.
Figure 7Mechanism of ACF’s action on melanoma under normoxic conditions. (A) ACF inhibits AKT phosphorylation. (B) ACF inhibits the phosphorylation of ATF4, mediated by RSK2. Reprinted with permission from ref (10). Published 2020 Open Access by MDPI.
Figure 8Pathways involved in HIF-1α-mediated glioma tumor formation. Reprinted with permission from ref (39). Copyright 2017 The Authors. Published Open Access by Springer Nature under a Creative Commons CC BY license.
IC50 (μM) Study for Anti-cancer Drugs against Colorectal Cancer (CRC), Ovarian Cancer (OC), and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Tumors[72]
| drug | CRC | OC | CLL | mononuclear cells |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACF | 1.4 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 1.4 |
| 5-FU | 755.2 | 562.8 | 658.2 | 429.8 |
| irinotecan | 89.6 | 75.3 | 29.3 | 25.4 |
| oxaliplatin | 26.1 | 10.9 | 7.6 | 2.9 |
Figure 9Structure of guanosine.
Figure 10Graphical illustration of the SARS-CoV-2 attack on host cells. Reprinted with permission from ref (113). Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 11Diagram of SARS-CoV-2 virus entry into the cell after activation of hypoxia-related pathway cells. Reprinted with permission from ref (116). Copyright 2022 Springer Nature.
Figure 12Scheme of synthesis of acriflavine conjugate with poly(maleic anhydride-alt-acrylic acid) copolymer (MAAA).