| Literature DB >> 36014027 |
Sarah Riesbeck1, Hannes Petruschke1, Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk1, Christian Schori2,3, Christian H Ahrens2, Christian Eberlein4, Hermann J Heipieper4, Martin von Bergen1,5, Nico Jehmlich1.
Abstract
Bisphenols are used in the process of polymerization of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. Bisphenols can easily migrate out of plastic products and enter the gastrointestinal system. By increasing colonic inflammation in mice, disrupting the intestinal bacterial community structure and altering the microbial membrane transport system in zebrafish, bisphenols seem to interfere with the gut microbiome. The highly abundant human commensal bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron was exposed to bisphenols (Bisphenol A (BPA), Bisphenol F (BPF), Bisphenol S (BPS)), to examine the mode of action, in particular of BPF. All chemicals caused a concentration-dependent growth inhibition and the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) corresponded to their individual logP values, a measure of their hydrophobicity. B. thetaiotaomicron exposed to BPF decreased membrane fluidity with increasing BPF concentrations. Physiological changes including an increase of acetate concentrations were observed. On the proteome level, a higher abundance of several ATP synthase subunits and multidrug efflux pumps suggested an increased energy demand for adaptive mechanisms after BPF exposure. Defense mechanisms were also implicated by a pathway analysis that identified a higher abundance of members of resistance pathways/strategies to cope with xenobiotics (i.e., antibiotics). Here, we present further insights into the mode of action of bisphenols in a human commensal gut bacterium regarding growth inhibition, and the physiological and functional state of the cell. These results, combined with microbiota-directed effects, could lead to a better understanding of host health disturbances and disease development based on xenobiotic uptake.Entities:
Keywords: bisphenols; fatty acid methyl ester; gut microbiome; proteomics; short-chain fatty acids; xenobiotics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014027 PMCID: PMC9414779 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10081610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Growth of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron exposed to BPA, BPF, and BPS. (A) Growth curves resulting from cells treated with different concentration of bisphenols. OD was measured at 600 nm and cells harvested in late exponential phase (n = 3). (B) Growth inhibition shown by relative growth rate (µrel). Growth at 0 mM (control) was set to 100%. A linear fit was applied to determine the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) for each bisphenol. Grey area indicating 95% confidence interval. Adj. R2 = 0.97. EC50 values: BPA: 0.3 mM, BPF: 1.2 mM, BPS: 2 mM.
Figure 2Effect of BPF (0–2 mM) on bacterial membrane lipids. (A) Relative abundance of saturated fatty acids. (B) Ratio of saturated and branched fatty acids. Both parameters are displayed with the relative growth rate of B. thetaiotaomicron during BPF exposure.
Figure 3Comparison of acetate production (µM) in B. thetaiotaomicron during BPF exposure. B. thetaiotaomicron was grown in BHI and exposed to either 50 µg/kg bw (0.14 mM) or 200 µg/kg bw (0.57 mM) BPF. The control contained 0.5% EtOH. Bacteria of all treatments were harvested in late exponential phase and supernatants of cultures were measured using a LC-MS/MS system. SCFA abundance was normalized to OD600. Statistical analysis was performed in RStudio running an ANOVA, following a Tukey’s HSD. *** p-value < 0.001, n = 3.
Figure 4Analysis of the proteome of B. thetaiotaomicron exposed to 0.57 mM BPF. (A) Principal component analysis based on protein abundances. PERMANOVA p-value of 0.01 highlights differences between BPF treatment and control. (B) Volcano plot shows differential abundant proteins (students t-test, adj. p-value < 0.05, Log2 fold change > 1). In total, 2050 proteins were detected, among which, 110 were differential abundant in BPF treated cells (decreased: 37 (blue), increased: 72 (red)). Highlighted proteins of interest (1–9) are listed in (C).
Figure 5Pathway analysis was based on the summed up protein abundance changes; the pathway function assignments were taken from the KEGG database. Twenty-one pathways were ascertained to be statistically different. A lower fold change indicates a less abundant pathway in BPF treated cells than in control and a fold change in the positive range reflects higher pathway abundance in BPF treated cells than in controls. Statistical analysis was performed in RStudio using multiple t-tests. Results were considered statistically different with a p-value adjusted (BH) < 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change > 0.2. n = 5.