Literature DB >> 30321396

Host Developmental Toxicity of BPA and BPA Alternatives Is Inversely Related to Microbiota Disruption in Zebrafish.

Tara R Catron1, Scott P Keely2, Nichole E Brinkman2, Todd J Zurlinden3, Charles E Wood4,5, Justin R Wright6,7, Drake Phelps1, Emily Wheaton2, Allison Kvasnicka8, Shaza Gaballah1, Regina Lamendella6,7, Tamara Tal4.   

Abstract

Host-associated microbiota can biotransform xenobiotics, mediate health effects of chemical exposure, and play important roles in early development. Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widespread environmental chemical that has been associated with adverse endocrine and neurodevelopmental effects, some of which may be mediated by microbiota. Growing public concern over the safety of BPA has resulted in its replacement with structurally similar alternatives. In this study, we evaluated whether BPA and BPA alternatives alter microbiota and modulate secondary adverse behavioral effects in zebrafish. Zebrafish were developmentally exposed to BPA, Bisphenol AF (BPAF), Bisphenol B (BPB), Bisphenol F (BPF), or Bisphenol S (BPS). At 10 days post fertilization (dpf), toxicity assessments were completed and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to evaluate potential chemical-dependent shifts in microbial community structure and predicted function. A standard light/dark behavioral assay was used to assess locomotor activity. Based on developmental toxicity assessments at 10 dpf, a range of potencies was observed: BPAF > BPB > BPFBPA > BPS. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data showed significant concentration-dependent disruption of microbial community structure and enrichment of putative microbial functions with exposure to BPS, BPA, or BPF, but not BPB or BPAF. Interestingly, microbial disruption was inversely related to host developmental toxicity and estrogenicity. Exposure to BP analogs did not cause behavioral effects at 10 dpf. Our findings indicate that some BP analogs disrupt host microbiota early in life and demonstrate novel chemical-microbiota interactions that may add important context to current hazard identification strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30321396     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  16 in total

1.  Simultaneous adsorption and determination of bisphenol compounds in water medium with a Zr(IV)-based metal-organic framework.

Authors:  Liming Yu; Jie Cheng; Haosen Yang; Jie Lv; Peilong Wang; Jian-Rong Li; Xiaoou Su
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Potential frameworks to support evaluation of mechanistic data for developmental neurotoxicity outcomes: A symposium report.

Authors:  Laura M Carlson; Frances A Champagne; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Laura Dishaw; Elaine Faustman; William Mundy; Deborah Segal; Christina Sobin; Carol Starkey; Michele Taylor; Susan L Makris; Andrew Kraft
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 3.  Zebrafish microbiome studies make waves.

Authors:  Keaton Stagaman; Thomas J Sharpton; Karen Guillemin
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 4.  Endocrine Disruptors in Food: Impact on Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Diseases.

Authors:  Yolanda Gálvez-Ontiveros; Sara Páez; Celia Monteagudo; Ana Rivas
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Evaluation of Developmental Toxicity, Developmental Neurotoxicity, and Tissue Dose in Zebrafish Exposed to GenX and Other PFAS.

Authors:  Shaza Gaballah; Adam Swank; Jon R Sobus; Xia Meng Howey; Judith Schmid; Tara Catron; James McCord; Erin Hines; Mark Strynar; Tamara Tal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Developmental exposure of California mice to endocrine disrupting chemicals and potential effects on the microbiome-gut-brain axis at adulthood.

Authors:  Sarabjit Kaur; Saurav J Sarma; Brittney L Marshall; Yang Liu; Jessica A Kinkade; Madison M Bellamy; Jiude Mao; William G Helferich; A Katrin Schenk; Nathan J Bivens; Zhentian Lei; Lloyd W Sumner; John A Bowden; Jeremy P Koelmel; Trupti Joshi; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Phylogenetic Integration Reveals the Zebrafish Core Microbiome and Its Sensitivity to Environmental Exposures.

Authors:  Thomas J Sharpton; Keaton Stagaman; Michael J Sieler; Holly K Arnold; Edward W Davis
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-15

8.  Behavioral changes and hyperglycemia in NODEF mice following bisphenol S exposure are affected by diets.

Authors:  Callie M McDonough; Joella Xu; Tai L Guo
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The Impact of Environmental Chemicals on the Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Karen Chiu; Genoa Warner; Romana A Nowak; Jodi A Flaws; Wenyan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.109

Review 10.  Bisphenol S in Food Causes Hormonal and Obesogenic Effects Comparable to or Worse than Bisphenol A: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Michael Thoene; Ewa Dzika; Slawomir Gonkowski; Joanna Wojtkiewicz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.