| Literature DB >> 36012881 |
Ali Khanafer1, Pervinder Bhogal2, Victoria Hellstern1, Christoph Harmening3, Hansjörg Bäzner4, Oliver Ganslandt5, Hans Henkes1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vasospasm after the rupture of an intracranial aneurysm is a frequent phenomenon and is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have survived intracranial hemorrhage and aneurysm treatment. We analyzed the diagnosis and management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who eventually died from ischemic brain damage due to vasospasm.Entities:
Keywords: cerebral vasospasm; endovascular treatment; intracranial aneurysm; subarachnoid hemorrhage
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012881 PMCID: PMC9410410 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Diagnostic imaging of a 57-year-old male patient with an aSAH due to a ruptured MCA aneurysm. Computed tomography (a) and CTA (b) revealed a massive aSAH and early vasospasm. CCT after one day (c,d) showed large ischemic infarctions.
Figure 2Diagnostic imaging and EVT in a 70-year-old female patient with an aSAH due to a ruptured basilar artery aneurysm. CT (a) showed a massive aSAH. DSA (b) with contrast-medium injection of the left vertebral artery (VA; lateral projection, asterisk) demonstrated the EVT with the coil mass inside the aneurysm. DSA (c) with contrast-medium injection of the right internal carotid artery (ICA; posterior–anterior projection) revealed massive vasospasm. Post-interventional CT (d) showed ischemic infarctions despite EVT.
Figure 3Diagnostic imaging and EVT in a 50-year-old female patient with an aSAH due to a ruptured left ICA aneurysm. Cranial CT (a) showed an aSAH. DSA with contrast-medium injection of both hemispheres revealed massive vasospasm (b,c). Post-interventional CT showed ischemic infarctions of both hemispheres (d).
Figure 4Diagnostic imaging and EVT in a 39-year-old female patient with an aSAH due to a ruptured anterior communicating artery (AcomA) aneurysm. Cranial CT showed an aSAH (a). DSA with a contrast-medium injection of the left ICA artery (lateral view 45°) showed an embolic occlusion of the superior trunk of the left MCA (arrow) and ACA (b) with the dissolution of the thrombus after infusion of rtPA (c). Cranial CT showed massive ischemic infarctions of both ICA and MCA supply territories (d).
Figure 5Flowchart summarizing the numbers of patients in the different subgroups.
Location of aneurysms in Group 1 (no vasospasm), 2 (non-fatal vasospasm), and 3 (fatal vasospasm).
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AchoA | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| AcomA | 224 | 113 | 20 |
| AICA | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Basilar artery bifurcation | 43 | 15 | 8 |
| Basilar artery trunk | 21 | 2 | 1 |
| Callosomarginal/pericallosal artery | 35 | 15 | 0 |
| Carotid bifurcation | 11 | 5 | 2 |
| MCA bifurcation | 119 | 75 | 13 |
| MCA, M1 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| MCA, M2 | 8 | 6 | 1 |
| Paraophthalmic ICA | 21 | 13 | 1 |
| PCA, P1 | 8 | 3 | 1 |
| PcomA | 90 | 55 | 13 |
| PICA | 33 | 9 | 0 |
| SCA | 7 | 2 | 0 |
| VA junction | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| VA, V4 | 12 | 9 | 1 |
Abbreviations: AchoA: anterior choroidal artery; AcomA: anterior communicating artery; AICA: anterior inferior cerebellar artery; ICA: internal carotid artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery; PCA: posterior cerebral artery; PcomA: posterior communicating artery; PICA: posterior inferior cerebellar artery; SCA: superior cerebellar artery; VA: vertebral artery.
Comparison of sex, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm morphology, and treatment technique in Group 1 (no vasospasm), 2 (non-fatal vasospasm), and 3 (fatal vasospasm).
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | F | 410 (62.0%) | 234 (69.2%) | 53 (82.8%) | 1 vs. 2 | 0.025 |
| M | 251 (38.0%) | 104 (30.8%) | 11 (17.2%) | 2 vs. 3 | 0.034 | |
| 3 vs. 1 | 0.001 | |||||
| Hunt and Hess grade | 1 | 133 (20.1%) | 60 (17.8%) | 2 (3.1%) | 1 vs. 2 | 0.033 |
| 2 | 175 (26.5%) | 78 (23.1%) | 3 (4.7%) | 2 vs. 3 | <0.001 | |
| 3 | 126 (19.1%) | 83 (24.6%) | 12 (18.8%) | 3 vs. 1 | <0.001 | |
| 4 | 86 (13.0%) | 60 (17.8%) | 11 (17.2%) | |||
| 5 | 141 (21.3%) | 57 (16.9%) | 36 (56.3%) | |||
| Fisher grade | 1 | 46 (7.0%) | 10 (3.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 1 vs. 2 | 0.054 |
| 2 | 72 (10.9%) | 32 (9.5%) | 0 (0%) | 2 vs. 3 | <0.001 | |
| 3 | 121 (18.3%) | 70 (20.7%) | 4 (6.3%) | 3 vs. 1 | <0.001 | |
| 4 | 422 (63.9%) | 226 (66.9%) | 59 (92.2%) | |||
| Aneurysm morphology | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Saccular | 594 (92.3%) | 315 (93.5%) | 51 (89.6%) | 1 vs. 2 | 0.014 | |
| Dissecting | 31 (4.8%) | 16 (4.7%) | 5 (8.8%) | 2 vs. 3 | 0.366 | |
| Fusiform | 13 (2.0%) | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | 3 vs. 1 | 0.529 | |
| Blister | 6 (0.9%) | 2 (0.6%) | 1 (1.8%) | |||
| Treatment | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Clipping | 123 (20.5%) | 89 (26.5%) | 8 (21.6%) | 1 vs. 2 | 0.442 | |
| Coiling | 352 (58.7%) | 182 (54.2%) | 20 (54.1%) | 2 vs. 3 | 0.370 | |
| Flow diverter | 34 (5.7%) | 20 (6.0%) | 2 (5.4%) | 3 vs. 1 | 0.332 | |
| pCONUS-assisted coiling | 38 (6.3%) | 21 (6.3%) | 4 (10.8%) | |||
| Stent-assisted coiling | 26 (4.3%) | 13 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Parent vessel occlusion | 13 (2.2%) | 7 (2.1%) | 3 (8.1%) | |||
| Liquid embolic agent | 3 (0.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |||
| Flow diverter-assisted coiling | 11 (1.8%) | 4 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | |||
Comparison of age and aneurysm size in Group 1 (no vasospasm), 2 (non-fatal vasospasm), and 3 (fatal vasospasm).
| Group | n | Median | Min–Max | Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||||
| 1 | 661 | 57.7 | 0.3–95.9 | 1 vs. 2 | <0.001 | |
| 2 | 338 | 52.0 | 14.3–88.6 | 2 vs. 3 | 0.069 | |
| 3 | 64 | 53.5 | 26.6–91.2 | 3 vs. 1 | 0.276 | |
| Aneurysm depth | ||||||
| 1 | 628 | 5.6 | 1.0–42.0 | 1 vs. 2 | 0.701 | |
| 2 | 332 | 5.8 | 1.0–31.4 | 2 vs. 3 | 0.151 | |
| 3 | 57 | 6.5 | 1.0–24.0 | 3 vs. 1 | 0.219 | |
| Aneurysm width | ||||||
| 1 | 628 | 4.0 | 0.7–40.0 | 1 vs. 2 | 0.136 | |
| 2 | 332 | 4.0 | 1.0–25.0 | 2 vs. 3 | 0.070 | |
| 3 | 57 | 5.0 | 1.0–16.0 | 3 vs. 1 | 0.250 | |
Causes of death after aSAH.
| Causes of Death | N= 188 |
|---|---|
| Endovascular treatment complication | |
| Surgical treatment complication | |
| Vasospasm | |
| Rebleeding | |
| Brain herniation | |
| Multiple organ dysfunction | |
| Pulmonary embolism | |
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | |
| Myocardial infarction/cardioplegia | |
| Other reasons (endocarditis, bleeding of esophageal varices, traumatic injuries) |
(a) Multivariate analysis (no vasospasm, non-fatal vasospasm, fatal vasospasm) proportional odds assumption. (b) Multivariate analysis (generalized ordered logistic regression). Comparison of non-fatal vasospasm versus no vasospasm and fatal vasospasm versus non-fatal vasospasm.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%-CI) | OR (95%-CI) | ||||
| (a) | |||||
| Sex | Female vs. male | 1.75 (1.32; 2.32) | <0.001 | 1.74 (1.31; 2.31) | <0.001 |
| HH grade | 2 vs. 1 | 0.97 (0.65; 1.45) | 0.873 | 0.96 (0.65; 1.44) | 0.854 |
| 3 vs. 1 | 1.47 (0.96; 2.24) | 0.075 | 1.46 (0.96; 2.23) | 0.078 | |
| 4 vs. 1 | 1.69 (1.06; 2.69) | 0.029 | 1.69 (1.06; 2.70) | 0.028 | |
| 5 vs. 1 | 1.88 (1.15; 3.06) | 0.011 | 1.89 (1.17; 3.06) | 0.010 | |
| Fisher grade | 2 vs. 1 | 1.70 (0.79; 3.64) | 0.174 | 1.70 (0.79; 3.65) | 0.175 |
| 3 vs. 1 | 2.41 (1.18; 4.88) | 0.015 | 2.39 (1.18; 4.86) | 0.016 | |
| 4 vs. 1 | 2.70 (1.35; 5.41) | 0.005 | 2.70 (1.35; 5.42) | 0.005 | |
| Aneurysm morphology | Regular vs. non-regular | 1.60 (1.00; 2.56) | 0.049 | 1.61 (1.01; 2.58) | 0.046 |
| Age at aSAB | 0.97 (0.96; 0.98) | <0.001 | 0.97 (0.96; 0.98) | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| Sex | Female vs. male | 1.71 (1.29; 2.27) | <0.001 | 1.71 (1.29; 2.27) | <0.001 |
| HH grade | 2 vs. 1 | 0.97 (0.64; 1.47) | 0.871 | 0.97 (0.64; 1.47) | 0.871 |
| 3 vs. 1 | 1.57 (1.00; 2.45) | 0.049 | 1.57 (1.00; 2.45) | 0.049 | |
| 4 vs. 1 | 1.73 (1.06; 2.84) | 0.029 | 1.73 (1.06; 2.84) | 0.029 | |
| 5 vs. 1 | 1.50 (0.93; 2.40) | 0.095 | 5.67 (3.00; 10.72) | <0.001 | |
| Fisher grade | 2 vs. 1 | 1.79 (0.81; 3.99) | 0.152 | 0.00 (0.00; 0.00) | <0.001 |
| 3 vs. 1 | 2.51 (1.21; 5.24) | 0.014 | 2.51 (1.21; 5.24) | 0.014 | |
| 4 vs. 1 | 2.83 (1.37; 5.82) | 0.005 | 2.83 (1.37; 5.82) | 0.005 | |
| Aneurysm morphology | Regular vs. non-regular | 1.69 (1.09; 2.63) | 0.019 | 1.69 (1.09; 2.63) | 0.019 |
| Age at aSAB | 0.96 (0.95; 0.97) | <0.001 | 0.99 (0.97; 1.02) | 0.650 | |