| Literature DB >> 32600433 |
Ioannis Tsogkas1,2, Vesna Malinova3, Katharina Schregel4,5, Dorothee Mielke3, Daniel Behme4, Veit Rohde3, Michael Knauth4, Marios-Nikos Psychogios4,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia is one of the leading causes of death and disability in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Transluminal balloon angioplasty (TBA) is a therapeutic option for vasospasms affecting proximal intracranial arteries.Entities:
Keywords: Angioplasty; Balloon-catheter; Scepter C balloon catheter; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Vasospasms; iFlow tool
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32600433 PMCID: PMC7322884 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01792-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1Angiographic and color-coded images processed with the iFlow tool of a 47-year-old female patient. Rupture and immediate coiling of a ACom-aneurysm. After 4 days significant vasospasms of the left and right MCA and Carotis-T arteries are depicted. Distal ICA and right M1 segment, left M1 and M2 were successfully treated with the Scepter C balloon catheter. An angioplasty of ACA wasn’t initially performed because of the recent coiling. Temporal delay between proximal and distal segments was significantly reduced after treatment
Fig. 2Angiographic and color-coded (pa und lateral) images processed with the iFlow tool of the same patient. Rupture and immediate coilembolization of a ACom-aneurysm. Three days after the first angioplasty, treatment with PTA of the left ACA because of persistent significant perfusion deficit
Baseline characteristics, treatment times, aneurysm location, SAB classification, balloon size, use of intraarterial medical treatment, dilated vessels, complications and treatment of the ruptured aneurysm. Baseline Characteristics of patients
| Pt/Case | Days to dilatation | Aneurysm location | Grad Fischer, Hunt-Hess | Balloon Size | Intraarterial medical vasodilatation | Dilatated Vessels | Complic. | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | 7 | PICA | III, IV | 4 × 15 | Yes | BA, LV, RCI, LCI, RM1, LM1 | No | Coiling |
| 2/2 | 8 | ACOM | III, I | 4 × 20 | Yes | RA1, RM1, LM1, LA1 | No | Coiling and Clipping |
| 3/3 | 6 | ACOM | IV, V | 4 × 15 | Yes | RCa-T, RM1, LCa-T, LM1, LV | No | Coiling |
| 3/4 | 9 | ACOM | IV, V | 4 × 10 | Yes | RA1, LA1 | No | Coiling |
| 4/5 | 14 | Basilar | III, I | 4 × 15 | No | RCa-T, RA1, RM1, RM2, LCa-T, LA1, LA2 | No | Coiling |
| 5/6 | 8 | PICA | IV, V | 4 × 20 | Yes | RCa-T, RM1 | No | Coiling |
| 5/7 | 11 | PICA | IV, V | 4 × 20 | Yes | LCa-T, LM1, LM2 | No | Coiling |
| 6/8 | 7 | ACI | IV, I | 4 × 10 | Yes | LCa-T, LM1, LM2, RCa-T | No | Coiling |
| 6/9 | 9 | ACI | IV, I | 4 × 10 | Yes | BA | No | Coiling |
| 6/10 | 10 | ACI | IV, I | 4 × 15 | Yes | LCI | No | Coiling |
| 6/11 | 13 | ACI | IV, I | 4 × 15 | Yes | LM1, RA1 | No | Coiling |
| 7/12 | 9 | ACOM | IV, V | 4 × 15 | No | LM1 | No | Coiling |
| 8/13 | 16 | Basilar | IV, III | 4 × 10 | Yes | RCa-T, RM1 | No | Coiling |
| 9/14 | No depiction of aneurysm | – | III, I | 4 × 20 | Yes | LCa-T, LM1, RCa-T, RM1 | No | – |
| 10/15 | 8 | ACI | IV, IV | 4 × 15 | Yes | LCa-T, LM1 | No | Clipping |
| 11/16 | 7 | RV | IV, III | 4 × 15 | Yes | LV | No | Coiling |
| 12/17 | 8 | ACI | IV, II | 4 × 10 | Yes | RA1, RM1 | No | Clipping |
| 13/18 | 11 | ACOM | IV, I | 4 × 20 | No | RM1, LM1, LA1 | No | Clipping |
| 14/19 | 8 | MCA | IV, III | 4 × 10 | Yes | RCa-T, RM1, LCa-T, LM1 | No | Clipping |
| 15/20 | 10 | MCA | IV, IV | 4 × 15 | No | RM1, RCI, LM1 | No | Clipping |
| 16/21 | 6 | Basilar | IV, V | 4 × 15 | No | LM1, LA1, RM1 | No | Clipping |
| 17/22 | 7 | ACOM | IV, II | 4 × 20 | Yes | LM1, LA1 | No | Coiling |
Clinical improvement and follow-up of patient’s outcome
| Pt/Case | Deterioration or deficit prior to endovascular treatment | Clinical improvement | mRS discharge | mRS Follow-up after 3 M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | Intubated | N/A | 6 | |
| 2/2 | Right hemiparesis | Minimal improvement | 0 | N/A |
| 3/3 | Intubated | N/A | 3 | |
| 3/4 | Intubated | N/A | 3 | |
| 4/5 | Left hemiparesis | Minimal improvement | 3 | 3 |
| 5/6 | Intubated | N/A | 1 | 1 |
| 5/7 | Intubated | N/A | 1 | 1 |
| 6/8 | Right arm paresis and aphasia | Aphasia completely resolved, moderate improvement of paresis | 1 | 0 |
| 6/9 | Aphasia | Aphasia completely resolved | 1 | 0 |
| 6/10 | Motoric aphasia and right hemiparesis | Moderate improvement of aphasia and hemiparesis | 1 | 0 |
| 6/11 | Aphasia, hemianopsia and right hemiparesis | No improvement | 1 | 0 |
| 7/12 | Intubated | N/A | 5 | N/A |
| 8/13 | Intubated | N/A | 1 | 1 |
| 9/14 | Intubated | N/A | 1 | 1 |
| 10/15 | Intubated | N/A | 2 | 1 |
| 11/16 | Intubated | N/A | 1 | 0 |
| 12/17 | Intubated | N/A | 5 | N/A |
| 13/18 | Disorientation and somnolence | No improvement | 0 | 0 |
| 14/19 | Intubated | N/A | 4 | 4 |
| 15/20 | Intubated | N/A | 3 | 1 |
| 16/21 | Intubated | N/A | 6 | |
| 17/22 | Intubated | N/A | 4 | 3 |
Comparison to other series regarding the endovascular treatment, the angiographic and the clinical improvement, and the favourable outcome. Comparison to other series concerning primary and secondary endpoints
| Series | No. Of patients | Endovascular Treatment | Angiographic improvement | Clinical improvement | Favourable outcome (mRS 0–2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bejjani et al., 1998 [ | 31 | TBA +/− papavarine | N/A | 72% | 80% |
| Coyne et al., 1994 [ | 13 | TBA | N/A | 31 | 38 |
| Eskridge et al., 1994 [ | 50 | TBA | N/A | 61 | N/A |
| Fujii et al., 1995 [ | 19 | TBA | 94 | 63 | 89 |
| Polin et al., 2000 | 38 | TBA +/− papaverine | 82 | 29 | 53 |
| Jestaedt et al., 2008 [ | 38 | TBA | 100 | N/A | 21 |
| Hoh and Ogilvy 2005 [ | 530 | TBA | N/A | 62 | N/A |
| Jun et al., 2010 | 60 | TBA +/−verapamil | 100 | N/A | 61 (the only IA group incl.) |
| Biondi et al., 2004 | 25 | Nimodipine | 42 | 76 | 72 |
| Feng et al., 2002 | 29 | Verapamil | 34 | 29 | N/A |
| Badjatia et al., 2004 | 18 | Nicardipine | 100 | 42 | N/A |
| Our study | 17 | TBA +/− papaverine or nimodipine | 100 | 23 | 53 |
Fig. 3Angiographic images of a 50-year-old female patient before and after the angioplasty of the left A2 segment with notable normalization of the width of the vessel