| Literature DB >> 36012595 |
Yahui Chen1,2, Shiyang Zhang2, Shanfeng Du1, Xiaomian Zhang3, Jiang Jiang1, Guangyu Wang2.
Abstract
Soil salinization is one of the main environmental factors affecting plant growth worldwide. Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. (T. ramosissima) is a halophyte representative that is widely grown in salinized soils. As an important nutrient element for plant growth, K+ plays an important role in improving the tolerance to salt stress, but the mechanism of reducing the damage caused by NaCl stress to T. ramosissima is less reported. Our results show that the proline content and the Log2 fold-change of proline's relative quantification in the roots of T. ramosissima increased over time with the application of exogenous potassium (K+) for 48 h and 168 h under NaCl stress. Moreover, 13 amino-acid-related metabolic pathways were involved in the resistance of T. ramosissima to salt stress. Mainly, the aldehyde dehydrogenase family genes and tryptophan-synthase-related genes were found at 48 h and 168 h with exogenous potassium applied to the roots of T. ramosissima under NaCl stress, and they regulated their related metabolic accumulation in the arginine and proline metabolism pathways, increasing the effectiveness of inducing NaCl tolerance of T. ramosissima. It is noteworthy that alpha-ketobutyric was produced in the roots of T. ramosissima under NaCl stress for 48 h with the application of exogenous potassium, which is one of the most effective mechanisms for inducing salt tolerance in plants. Meanwhile, we found three DEGs regulating alpha-ketobutyric acid. This study provides a scientific theoretical basis for further understanding the molecular mechanism of K+ alleviating the salinity damage to T. ramosissima caused by NaCl.Entities:
Keywords: NaCl stress; T. ramosissima; amino acid; exogenous potassium; proline; salt poison
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012595 PMCID: PMC9409283 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Log2 fold-change of proline’s relative quantification in the T. ramosissima roots under different treatments (Log2 fold-change of proline’s relative quantification in the roots of T. ramosissima under 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Note: p ≥ 0.05 is not marked; ** 0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001).
Arginine and proline metabolic pathway.
| Number | Pathway | Candidate Genes with Pathway Annotation | Gene | Candidate Metabolites with Pathway Annotation | Metabolite | Pathway ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 mM NaCl 48 h vs. 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl 48 h | ||||||
| 24 | Arginine and proline metabolism | 33 | 0.757413 | 2 | 0.474945 | ko00330 |
| 200 mM NaCl 168 h vs. 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl 168 h | ||||||
| 7 | Arginine and proline metabolism | 37 | 0.112464 | 2 | 0.564616 | ko00330 |
Note: 24 and 7 represent the KEGG pathway rankings.
Figure 2Analysis of the arginine and proline metabolic pathway: The changes in the annotated expression levels of DEGs and differential metabolites in the arginine and proline metabolic pathway, and the regulatory relationship between DEGs and differential metabolites in the 200 mM NaCl 48 h vs. 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl 48 h and 200 mM NaCl 168 h vs. 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl 168 h comparison groups. Note—Black: gene expression level is downregulated, metabolites are degraded; red: gene expression level is upregulated, metabolites are accumulated.
Figure 3Pearson’s correlation clustering heatmap analysis of DEGs and differential metabolites in the arginine and proline metabolic pathway: The DEGs and differential metabolites contained in Pearson’s correlation clustering heatmap analysis based on the 200 mM NaCl 48 h vs. 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl 48 h and 200 mM NaCl 168 h vs. 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM KCl 168 h comparison groups in the arginine and proline metabolic pathway. Note: p ≥ 0.05 is not marked; * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ** 0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Information sheet for the 19 homologous gene species.
| Family | Species | Description | Protein ID | CDS (bp) | ORF Length (aa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amaranthaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_021849540.1 | 1467 | 488 |
| Vitaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_034682258.1 | 1488 | 495 |
| Rosaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_021815051.1 | 1464 | 487 |
| Cucurbitaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_022984451.1 | 1434 | 477 |
| Solanaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 member F1 | MCD7447503.1 | 1461 | 486 |
| Rhamnaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_048335012.1 | 1455 | 484 |
| Fagaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1-like | XP_023880319.1 | 1443 | 480 |
| Rosaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 isoform X2 | XP_020423669.1 | 1503 | 500 |
| Malvaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 isoform X1 | XP_016692426.1 | 1452 | 483 |
| Rubiaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1-like isoform X1 | XP_027178566.1 | 1467 | 488 |
| Celastraceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 isoform X1 | XP_038697178.1 | 1473 | 490 |
| Fabaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | KAF7828920.1 | 1458 | 485 |
| Myricaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | KAB1204492.1 | 1443 | 480 |
| Rubiaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 isoform X1 | XP_027074002.1 | 1467 | 488 |
| Myrtaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_030469961.1 | 1443 | 480 |
| Rosaceae | Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_009378224.2 | 1494 | 497 | |
| Solanaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 isoform X1 | XP_015066806.1 | 1470 | 489 |
| Euphorbiaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_012078389.1 | 1449 | 482 |
| Malvaceae |
| Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 3 member F1 | XP_038994791.1 | 1440 | 479 |
Figure 4Validation of DEGs by qRT-PCR: Eight DEGs were randomly selected for qRT-PCR validation. The error bars were obtained from multiple replicates of qRT-PCR. Note: p ≥ 0.05 is not marked; * 0.01 < p < 0.05; ** 0.001 < p < 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001. : Numerical value is shown on the right side of the Y axis; : Numerical value is shown on the left side of the Y axis.