| Literature DB >> 36009259 |
María Marhuenda-Muñoz1,2,3, Inés Domínguez-López1,2,3, Emily P Laveriano-Santos1,2,3, Isabella Parilli-Moser1,2,3, Cristina Razquin1,4, Miguel Ruiz-Canela1,4, Francisco Javier Basterra-Gortari4,5, Dolores Corella1,6, Jordi Salas-Salvadó1,7,8, Montserrat Fitó1,9, José Lapetra1,10, Fernando Arós1,11, Miquel Fiol1,12, Lluis Serra-Majem1,13, Xavier Pintó1,14, Enrique Gómez-Gracia1,15, Emilio Ros1,16, Ramon Estruch1,17, Rosa M Lamuela-Raventós1,2,3.
Abstract
The intake of polyphenols has been associated with a risk reduction of type 2 diabetes. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the molecules that might be metabolically active after ingestion are only starting to be investigated regarding this metabolic disease. To investigate the association between one-year changes in urinary microbial phenolic metabolites (MPM) and the incidence of type 2 diabetes, we performed a case-control study using data and samples of the PREDIMED trial including 46 incident type 2 diabetes cases of 172 randomly selected participants. Eight urinary MPMs were quantified in urine by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and used to assess their associations with type 2 diabetes risk by multivariable logistic regression models. Compared to participants in the lowest tertile of one-year changes in hydroxybenzoic acid glucuronide, those in the highest tertile had a significantly lowered probability of developing type 2 diabetes (OR [95% CI], 0.39 [0.23-0.64]; p < 0.001 for trend). However, when additionally adjusting for fasting plasma glucose, the statistical significance was lost. Changes in the dietary pattern can increase the concentrations of this compound, derived from many (poly)phenol-rich foods, and might be changing the gut microbial population as well, promoting the production of the metabolite.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; PREDIMED study; bioactive compounds; cardiovascular; liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; phytochemicals; urinary microbial phenolic metabolites
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009259 PMCID: PMC9405292 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11081540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Flow-chart of the case-control design.
General characteristics of the study population at baseline.
| Cases ( | Controls ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Women, | 26 (56.5) | 84 (66.8) | 0.220 |
| Age (years) | 65.9 ± 6.0 | 67.9 ± 5.7 | 0.039 |
| Intervention group, | 0.334 | ||
| Mediterranean Diet + EVOO | 18 (39.1) | 54 (42.9) | |
| Mediterranean Diet + nuts | 12 (26.1) | 42 (33.3) | |
| Control | 16 (34.8) | 30 (23.8) | |
| Dyslipidemia, | 38 (82.6) | 98 (77.8) | 0.491 |
| Hypertension, | 45 (97.8) | 113 (89.7) | 0.084 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.9 ± 3.0 | 30.6 ± 3.9 | 0.721 |
| Energy intake (Kcal/day) | 2381 ± 544 | 2276 ± 488 | 0.226 |
| Smoking habit, | 0.682 | ||
| Current smoker | 8 (17.4) | 20 (15.9) | |
| Past smoker | 12 (26.1) | 26 (20.6) | |
| Never smoker | 26 (56.5) | 80 (63.5) | |
| Physical activity (METs-min/day) | 258.2 ± 176.3 | 218.4 ± 208.6 | 0.250 |
| Level of education, | |||
| High and medium studies | 12 (26.1) | 25 (15.8) | 0.378 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 118.8 ± 18.1 | 96.5 ± 12.8 | <0.001 |
EVOO, extra-virgin olive oil; MET, metabolic task equivalents. Values are percentages for categorical variables and means ± SD for continuous variables. p-values were calculated by t-test for continuous variables and the χ2-test for categorical variables.
Likelihood (OR [95% CI]) of incident type 2 diabetes by tertiles of one-year changes in urinary concentrations of MPMs in the PREDIMED Study.
| No. of Cases | T1 | T2 | T3 |
| 1-SD Increment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 57 | 57 | ||||
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 0.31 [0.18–0.54] | 0.81 [0.38–1.71] | 0.579 | 0.91 [0.70–1.19] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.31 [0.19–0.53] | 0.88 [0.31–2.49] | 0.813 | 0.94 [0.70–1.26] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.22 [0.14–0.36] | 0.67 [0.30–1.48] | 0.284 | 0.78 [0.60–1.01] | |
| Hydroxybenzoic acid glucuronide | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 0.54 [0.34–0.86] | 0.41 [0.26–0.65] | <0.001 | 0.63 [0.51–0.79] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.52 [0.32–0.86] | 0.39 [0.24–0.64] | <0.001 | 0.61 [0.49–0.77] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.49 [0.13–1.84] | 0.61 [0.19–1.97] | 0.341 | 0.69 [0.44–1.09] | |
| Enterolactone glucuronide | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 0.97 [0.40–2.35] | 0.79 [0.54–1.14] | 0.208 | 1.08 [0.93–1.25] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.05 [0.51–2.13] | 0.73 [0.45–1.19] | 0.209 | 1.10 [0.89–1.36] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.17 [0.79–1.73] | 0.79 [0.29–2.13] | 0.789 | 1.06 [0.73–1.54] | |
| m-coumaric acid | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 1.35 [0.75–2.44] | 1.78 [0.82–3.87] | 0.147 | 1.26 [0.97–1.63] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.48 [0.75–2.91] | 1.71 [0.89–3.32] | 0.110 | 1.24 [0.99–1.55] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.46 [1.13–1.89] | 1.58 [0.91–2.73] | 0.110 | 1.11 [0.96–1.30] | |
| Hydroxytyrosol sulphate | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 0.54 [0.41–0.72] | 0.57 [0.22–1.50] | 0.258 | 0.93 [0.58–1.49] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.59 [0.51–0.68] | 0.57 [0.30–1.09] | 0.090 | 0.94 [0.63–1.39] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.38 [0.17–0.86] | 0.34 [0.07–1.72] | 0.265 | 0.71 [0.31–1.65] | |
| Protocatechuic acid | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 1.51 [0.40–5.67] | 1.75 [0.73–4.20] | 0.208 | 1.26 [0.87–1.83] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.83 [0.54–6.15] | 1.91 [0.83–4.40] | 0.129 | 1.30 [0.91–1.87] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 3.00 [0.75–12.02] | 2.08 [0.89–4.88] | 0.068 | 1.35 [0.85–2.13] | |
| Vanillic acid glucuronide | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 0.99 [0.48–2.04] | 0.76 [0.31–1.84] | 0.546 | 0.94 [0.60–1.48] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.95 [0.39–2.35] | 0.89 [0.48–1.63] | 0.702 | 1.04 [0.71–1.50] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.17 [0.44–3.10] | 1.53 [0.61–3.81] | 0.399 | 1.31 [0.82–2.08] | |
| Vanillic acid sulphate | Basic model | 1.00 (ref) | 0.83 [0.74–0.93] | 1.13 [0.71–1.81] | 0.608 | 1.02 [0.75–1.38] |
| Multivariable model 1 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.87 [0.77–0.97] | 1.11 [0.79–1.55] | 0.554 | 1.01 [0.79–1.31] | |
| Multivariable model 2 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.76 [0.29–2.01] | 1.38 [0.97–1.97] | 0.046 | 1.06 [0.70–1.61] | |
Inverse normal transformation was applied to raw values of metabolites. The basic model was adjusted for sex, age, and intervention group. To the covariables in the basic model we added body mass index, physical activity, smoking status, education level, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and energy intake to build model 1. Model 2 was further adjusted for baseline fasting plasma glucose. Robust variance estimators were used to account for recruitment center. CI indicates confidence interval; MPM, microbial phenolic metabolite; SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference. In bold, tertiles that were significantly different from the reference after adjusting the p values to account for multiple testing using the Simes procedure.
Figure 2Likelihood (OR [95% CI]) of type 2 diabetes development by one-year changes in urinary concentrations of MPM in the PREDIMED Study. This model was adjusted for sex, age, intervention group, body mass index, physical activity, smoking status, education level, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and energy intake.