| Literature DB >> 36008763 |
Jorge Luiz Dantas de Medeiros1, Bruno Carneiro Bezerra2, Helen Rainara Araújo Cruz2, Katarina Azevedo de Medeiros2, Maria Eduarda Cardoso de Melo3, Aquiles Sales Craveiro Sarmento3, Marcela Abbott Galvão Ururahy4, Lucymara Fassarella Agnez Lima3, Alcebíades José Dos Santos Neto5, Josivan Gomes Lima5, Vanessa Resqueti1,6, Lucien Peroni Gualdi2, Guilherme Fregonezi1,6, Julliane Tamara Araújo de Melo Campos7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congenital Generalized Lipodystrophy (CGL) is an ultra-rare disease characterized by metabolic disorders. However, the evaluation of functional exercise capacity, cardiovascular (CV) response to exercise, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in CGL is scarce. Here we evaluated the performance and CV response to exercise and their association with PAD in CGL compared to healthy individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Ankle-brachial index; Cardiovascular response; Lipodystrophy; Metabolism; Six-min walk test
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36008763 PMCID: PMC9414389 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02828-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.174
Fig. 1Flowchart of this research. CGL Congenital Generalized Lipodystrophy, ABI ankle-brachial index, 6MWT 6-min walk test
Clinical and genetic data of CGL subjects
| Case | Gender/age (years) | Mutated gene | Mutation type | Comorbidities | Drugs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ♂/18 | HT | None | ||
| 2 | ♀/20 | DM, HT, SH | ISL, MLP | ||
| 3*# | ♀/20 | DM, HT, SH | MTF | ||
| 4*# | ♀/24 | DM, HT, SH, RMW | ISL, MLP | ||
| 5*# | ♀/24 | DM, HT | None | ||
| 6 | ♀/27 | DM, HT | ISL | ||
| 7* | ♂/27 | DM, HT, RMW | MTF, HCT, SXG, CPF, RMP, MLP | ||
| 8 | ♀/31 | DM, AH, HT, SH, RMW | ISL, MLP | ||
| 9 | ♂/32 | DM, AH, HT, SH, RMW | ISL, SXG, MTF, RMP, MLP | ||
| 10 | ♀/33 | HT | None | ||
| 11 | ♂/34 | RMW | MTF, SVT | ||
| 12*# | ♀/46 | DM, HT, RMW | ISL |
DM diabetes mellitus, AH arterial hypertension, HT hypertriglyceridemia, SH steatohepatitis, KF kidney failure, ♀ females, ♂ males
*Subjects who participated in 2018 but were lost to follow-up in 2019 for the 6MWT test
#Subjects who participated in 2018 but were lost to follow-up in 2019 for the ABI test. MTF Metformin, MLP Metreleptin, HCT Hydrochlorothiazide, SXG Saxagliptin, CPF Ciprofibrate, RMP Ramipril, Insulin ISL, SVT Sinvastatin, RMW Respiratory Muscle Weakness
Physiological and metabolic data of CGL subjects
| Baseline (n = 12) | 1-year follow-up (n = 8) | Control (n = 12) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female, n (%) | 8 (67) | 4 (50) | 8 (67) | > 0.999 | 0.745 | 0.456 |
| Age (years) | 28 ± 7.8 | 28.5 ± 7.9 | 27.5 ± 7.6 | 0.990 | 0.947 | 0.981 |
| Height (m) | 1.63 ± 0.09 | 1.63 ± 0.09 | 1.65 ± 0.09 | 0.960 | 0.949 | 0.998 |
| Weight (kg) | 55.7 ± 12.8 | 56.9 ± 12.2 | 70.4 ± 2.5 | 0.022 | 0.030 | 0.966 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.85 ± 0.9 | 21. ± 2.8 | 26.4 ± 1.08 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.989 |
| DM, n (%) | 9 (75) | 4 (50) | 0 (0) | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.250 |
| Fasting glycemia (mg/dL) | 155.30 ± 115.8 | 160.6 ± 108.4 | NA | – | – | 0.148 |
| Serum triglycerides (mg/dL) | 226.3 ± 186.6 | 141.4 ± 67.1 | NA | – | – | 0.382 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 162.9 ± 68 | 163.1 ± 42.6 | NA | – | – | 0.250 |
| VLDL-c (mg/dL) | 45.2 ± 37.3 | 25.38 ± 8.1 | NA | – | – | 0.250 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 79.6 ± 34.7 | 114.9 ± 35.5 | NA | – | – | 0.015 |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 32.6 ± 9.5 | 22.8 ± 6.9 | NA | – | – | 0.125 |
| Non-HDL-c (mg/dL) | 127. 10 ± 73.5 | 140.3 ± 39.6 | NA | – | – | 0.031 |
p values were based on independent t-tests. For categorical variables, the p value was calculated using the chi-square test. pa: Comparison between Control and CGL—Baseline. pb: Comparison between Control and CGL—1-year follow-up. pc: Comparison between CGL—Baseline and 1-year follow-up. p values were based on independent unpaired t-tests or Mann–Whitney test. BMI Body Mass Index, DM diabetes mellitus, NA Not available. Baseline peripheral blood of CGL subjects was collected on a different day of ABI and 6WMT data collection. CGL metabolic data from 1-year follow-up were used for correlation analysis since peripheral blood, ABI, and 6WMT were obtained on the same day
Fig. 2The ankle-brachial index (ABI) values of CGL subjects at baseline and 1-year follow-up. A right ABI and B left ABI indexes compared to the healthy individuals. C right ABI and D left ABI indexes according to the use of metreleptin (MLP). ABI indexes are expressed as arbitrary values and the results are represented as the mean ± SD. E right ABI and F left ABI indexes only of CGL subjects who participated at 1-year follow-up. Filled and empty shapes for each CGL subject indicate without and with MLP replacement, respectively. ABI indexes are expressed as arbitrary values. The differences were considered statistically significant when *p < 0.05 using the unpaired Student’s t-test. The significance ranges were represented by: * 0.05 > p ≥ 0.01
ABI and 6MWD measurements (mean ± SD and [95% confidence interval]) in healthy control and all CGL subjects at baseline and 1-year follow-up
| Control | CGL—Baseline | CGL—1-year follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABI (right) | (n = 12) | (n = 12) | (n = 8) | |||
| 1.06 ± 0.08 [0.95–1.06] | 1.03 ± 0.11 [0.96–1.10] | 1.10 ± 0.28 [0.86–1.34] | 0.509 | 0.309 | 0.478 | |
| ABI (left) | (n = 12) | (n = 12) | (n = 8) | |||
| 1.04 ± 0.05 [1.00–1.08] | 1.11 ± 0.23 [0.96–1.25] | 1.13 ± 0.14 [1.01–1.25] | 0.324 | 0.060 | 0.799 | |
| 6MWD (meters) | (n = 12) | (n = 9) | (n = 6) | |||
| 515.2 ± 68.48 [471.7–558.7] | 435.1 ± 85.78 [369.2–501.0] | 537.5 ± 103.3 [429.1–645.9] | 0.027 | 0.588 | 0.056 | |
| 6MWD (predict%) | (n = 12) | (n = 9) | (n = 6) | |||
| 87.05 ± 10.93 [80.10–93.99] | 72.19 ± 12.43 [62.64–81.75] | 88.96 ± 14.48 [73.77–104.2] | 0.009 | 0.757 | 0.032 |
ABI Ankle-Brachial Index, 6MWD 6-min walk distance. pa: Comparison between Control and CGL—Baseline. pb: Comparison between Control and CGL—1-year follow-up. pc: Comparison between CGL—Baseline and 1-year follow-up. p values were based on independent unpaired t-tests or Mann–Whitney test
Fig. 3The 6-min walk distance (6MWD) values of CGL subjects at baseline and 1-year follow-up. A 6MWD (meters) and B 6MWD (predict%) values compared to healthy individuals. C 6MWD (meters) and D 6MWD (predict%) values according to the use of metreleptin (MLP). The values are represented as the mean ± SD. E 6MWD (meters) and F 6MWD (predict%) values only of CGL subjects who participated at 1-year follow-up. Filled and empty shapes for each CGL subject indicate without and with MLP replacement, respectively. The differences were considered statistically significant when *p < 0.05 using the unpaired Student’s t-test. The significance ranges were represented by: * 0.05 > p ≥ 0.01, and ** 0.01 > p ≥ 0.001
Fig. 4CV variables of CGL and healthy subjects before and after the 6-min walk test (6MWT). A Systolic blood pressure (SBP), B Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), C Heart rate (HR), D Oxygen saturation (SpO2), and E Borg’s score values in the CGL group are from baseline and 1-year follow-up. Multiple comparisons were performed using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test. Intra-group analyses were made using a paired Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. The differences were considered statistically significant when *p < 0.05 (for ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test) and #p < 0.05 (for paired Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). The significance ranges were represented by: */# 0.05 > p ≥ 0.01
CV variables (mean ± SD and [95% confidence interval]) in CGL subjects and healthy volunteers (Control) before and after 6MWT at baseline and 1-year follow-up
| Control (n = 12) | CGL—Baseline (n = 9) | CGL—1-year follow-up (n = 6) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-exercise | 116.50 ± 21.01 [103.1–129.9] | 122.20 ± 9.71 [114.8–129.7] | 113.30 ± 13.66 [99.0–127.7] | 0.459 | 0.867 | 0.162 |
| Post-exercise | 115.80 ± 14.44 [106.6–124.9] | 136.70 ± 8.66 [130.0–143.3] | 151.70 ± 24.01 [126.5–176.9] | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.075 |
| 0.889 | 0.003 | 0.002 | ||||
| Pre-exercise | 70.50 ± 10.52 [63.82–77.18] | 86.67 ± 8.66 [80.01–93.32] | 66.67 ± 8.16 [58.10–75.24] | 0.001 | 0.447 | 0.000 |
| Post-exercise | 70.83 ± 8.67 [65.32–76.34] | 92.22 ± 8.33 [85.82–98.63] | 81.67 ± 23.17 [57.36–106.0] | 0.000 | 0.583 | 0.337 |
| 0.793 | 0.312 | 0.150 | ||||
| Pre-exercise | 81.58 ± 8.79 [76.0–87.17] | 101.90 ± 14.23 [90.95–112.8] | 88.33 ± 14.65 [72.96–103.70] | 0.000 | 0.055 | 0.170 |
| Post-exercise | 84.83 ± 13.67 [76.15–93.52] | 106.40 ± 16.12 [94.06–118.8] | 117.20 ± 21.12 [95.00–139.30] | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.284 |
| 0.321 | 0.003 | 0.031 | ||||
| Pre-exercise | 98.25 ± 0.75 [97.77–98.73] | 97.89 ± 1.05 [97.08–98.70] | 98.17 ± 0.40 [97.74–98.60] | 0.370 | 0.795 | 0.719 |
| Post-exercise | 97.75 ± 0.96 [97.14–98.36] | 97.89 ± 0.6 [97.43–98.35] | 98.17 ± 0.40 [97.14–98.60] | 0.709 | 0.490 | 0.633 |
| 0.234 | > 0.999 | > 0.999 | ||||
| Pre-exercise | 0.25 ± 0.86 [-0.30–0.39] | 0 [0–0] | 0 [0–0] | 0.400 | > 0.999 | > 0.999 |
| Post-exercise | 1.08 ± 1.08 [0.80–1.77] | 1.77 ± 1.64 [0.51–3.04] | 1.83 ± 0.98 [0.80–2.86] | 0.256 | 0.230 | 0.959 |
| 0.062 | 0.031 | 0.062 | ||||
SBP Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), Heart rate (beats/min), SpO Pulse oximetry oxygen saturation, ABI Ankle-Brachial Index. 6MWT: 6-min walk test. pa: Comparison between Control and CGL—Baseline. pb: Comparison between Control and CGL—1-year follow-up. pc: Comparison between CGL—Baseline and 1-year follow-up. pa,b,c values were based on independent unpaired t-test or Mann–Whitney test. p values were based on independent paired t-tests or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test
Fig. 5The CV variables of CGL subjects before and after the 6-min walk test (6MWT) according to the use of metreleptin (MLP). A Pre-exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP), B pre-exercise diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and C pre-exercise heart rate (HR) only of CGL subjects who participated at 1-year follow-up. Filled and empty shapes indicate without and with metreleptin (MLP) replacement, respectively. D Systolic blood pressure (SBP), E Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and F Heart rate (HR) before and after the 6-min walk test (6MWT). The column corresponding to MLP replacement was kept in gray. The values are from 2018 to 2019. The differences were considered statistically significant when *p < 0.05 using unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test. The significance ranges were represented by: */# 0.05 > p ≥ 0.01