Six-minute walk test in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients living in Northwest Africa.

INTRODUCTION: International recommendations of the exploration of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are focused on deficiency and not incapacity. AIMS: (1) To estimate the incapacity of NIDDM patients through the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) data. (2) To determine their 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) influencing factors (3) To compare data of NIDDM patient group (PG; n = 100) with those of two control groups (CG): CG1 (n = 174, healthy nonobese and nonsmoker); CG2 (n = 55, obese nondiabetic free from comorbidities). POPULATION AND METHODS: The anthropometric, socioeconomic, clinical, metabolic, and 6MWT data of 100 NIDDM patients (45 females) were collected.
RESULTS: Total sample means ± standard deviation of age, weight, and height were 54 ± 8 years, 81 ± 14 kg, and 1.64 ± 0.09 m. (1) Measured 6MWD (566 ± 81 m) was significantly lower than the theoretical 6MWD (90% ± 12%). The profile of the PG carrying the 6MWT, was as follows: 23% had an abnormal 6MWD; at the end of the 6MWT, 21% and 12% had, respectively, a low heart rate and a high dyspnea (>5/10), and 4% had desaturation during the walk. The estimated "cardiorespiratory and muscular chain" age (68 ± 16 years) was significantly higher than the chronological age. (2) The factors that significantly influenced the 6MWD (r(2) = 0.58) are included in the following equation: 6MWD (m) = -73.94 × gender (0, male; 1, female) - 3.25 × age (years) + 7.33 × leisure activity score - 35.57 × obesity (0, no; 1, yes) + 32.86 × socioeconomic level (0, low; 1, high) - 27.67 × cigarette use (0, no; 1, yes) + 8.89 × resting oxyhemoglobin saturation - 105.48. (3) Compared to the CGs, the PG had a significantly (P < 0.05) lower 6MWD (100%+9% and 100%+8%, respectively, for the CG1 and CG2).
CONCLUSION: NIDDM seems to accelerate the decline of the submaximal aerobic capacity evaluated through the 6MWD.

Introduction

The Maghreb (region of Northwest Africa comprising five countries: Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, and Mauritania) is undergoing an epidemiological transition characterized by a decrease of infectious diseases and an increase in chronic noninfectious ones.1 This increase is largely due to a marked change in lifestyle (sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and stress of urbanization and labor), including changes in food consumption patterns.1 Among noninfectious chronic diseases, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), a disease marked by expansion over the past decade, is becoming a real public health emergency.2 For example, its prevalence in North Africa is estimated at 10%.3 NIDDM poses a major public health problem, more particularly with the cardiovascular complications it causes (myocardial infarction [MI], occlusion of arteries of lower limbs, stroke).1,3

To better explore this killer disease, it would be interesting to refer to the World Health Organization’s latest classification of the natural history of chronic diseases, reporting three evolutionary stages:4 deficiency, incapacity, and social disadvantage. The evaluation of incapacity (clinically characterized by dyspnea, pain in the lower limbs, and intermittent claudication3,5) is considered essential, because alone it can predict the future functioning of the patient.6 This is the determination of exercise tolerance through, for example, data from a field test such as the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), which explores the cardiorespiratory and muscle chain.6 The social disadvantage is the psychosocial impact of the disease. This is the assessment of the quality of life (QOL).

Internationally, several recommendations for NIDDM management have been developed by scientific societies.5,7–11 These recommendations mainly focus on the exploration of deficiency (blood tests [glucose, glycated hemoglobin {HbA1c}, lipid profile, microalbuminuria, renal function], blood pressure). These explorations are conducted for static diagnostic purposes or to detect degenerative complications. However, none of these societies recommend the exploration of incapacity,5,7–11 while two recent studies12,13 have shown that NIDDM significantly alters submaximal aerobic capacity. These two studies unfortunately have methodological shortcomings: inclusion of patients with NIDDM and heart failure13 or inclusion of only very elderly patients.12

The assessment of functional incapacity, for example, through 6MWT data (endurance test, intensity moderately higher than daily living activities6,14), is desirable. Indeed, the skill of walking is a reflection of the ability to maintain a number of daily-life activities for patients.6 Therefore, it is an important QOL component.6

Hence the aims of our study, done in NIDDM patients living in Northwest Africa, are:

To estimate the incapacity of NIDDM patients by establishing their profile during the 6MWT: number of patients having an abnormal 6MWD, and/or stopping while walking, and/or having desaturation, and/or expressing dyspnea at the end of the test, and/or showing impaired chronotropic response.

To determine factors influencing their 6MWD and to compare their chronological and estimated “cardiorespiratory and muscular chain” ages.

To compare data of NIDDM patient group (PG; n = 100) with those of three control groups (CGs): CG1 (n = 174), healthy nonobese and nonsmoker; CG2 (n = 55), nondiabetic obese, free from comorbidities; CG3 (n = 59), nondiabetic “all comers.”

Population and methods

Study design

We performed this cross-sectional study over a 5-month period in Farhat HACHED Hospital’s Physiology and Functional Exploration Department and in the Basic Health Group’s Laboratory of Biochemistry in Sousse (altitude < 100 m), Tunisia.

Approval for the study was obtained from the hospital’s ethics committee, and written consent was obtained from all study participants.

NIDDM patients were recruited in three ways. We contacted general practitioners and/or endocrinology specialists. An article was published in a weekly newspaper announcing the need for recruitment of NIDDM patients. Informational letters clarifying the aims of the study were then put up at the hospital and the local medical school.

NIDDM patient group

Only patients aged over 40 years with an NIDDM status for more than 5 years were included. Noninclusion criteria were as follows: type 1 diabetes, insulin-requiring diabetes; history of orthopedic or surgical disease interfering with walking; recent infection; chronic corticoids use; inability to perform the 6MWT exactly and 6MWT counterindications;6 unstable angina or myocardial infarction during the previous month; resting heart rate ≥ 120 bpm, resting systolic or diastolic pressure, ≥180 mmHg and ≥100 mmHg, respectively.

Sample sizes

NIDDM patient group

Sample size was calculated according to the following predictive equation:15 n = (Z2 × p × q)/Δ2, where n was the number of required NIDDM patients, Z was the 95% confidence level (=1.96), q was equal to 1 – p, Δ was the precision (=10%), and p was the estimation of the 6MWD decline or submaximal aerobic capacity induced by NIDDM. According to studies, 48% (P = 0.48) of older non-disabled diabetic patients at baseline developed functional limitations over a 7-year follow-up.16 The sample size was thus 96.

Control groups

We recruited three CGs over 40 years of age. They were tested in our department over the same period as the PG.

CG1: healthy nonobese and nonsmoker subjects (87 males and 87 females).

CG2: nondiabetic obese subjects free from comorbidities (17 males and 38 females).

These two CGs were recruited as a part of current protocols aiming to evaluate the submaximal exercise capacity of narghile smokers17 and obstructive-sleep-apnea patients.18

CG3: Nondiabetic “all comers” subjects (37 males and 22 females) adressed to our department for 6MWT, indicated as preoperative assessment, or faced with various diseases (especially cardiorespiratory diseases).

Medical and physical activity questionnaires

A medical questionnaire recommended for epidemiological research was used to assess subject characteristics (schooling level [SL] and occupational status, smoking, medical, surgical, and gynecologic-obstetric histories, and medication use).19

Two SLs were defined: low (illiterate, primary education) and high (secondary and university education). Two socioeconomic levels (SEL) were defined according to occupational status:14 low (eg, unskilled worker, jobless) and high (eg, skilled worker, farmer, manager).

Cigarette and narghile usage was evaluated, respectively, in pack-years (PY) and narghile-years (NY).20 Two groups of cigarette (0, no [use <2 PY]; 1, yes [use ≥2 PY]) and narghile (0, no [use <1 NY), ]; 1, yes [use ≥1 NY]) users were defined. Narghile (water pipe that enables the smoking of a tobacco preparation burned by charcoal embers; the smoke is cooled by passing through water before being inhaled) use alters lung capacity and therefore cardiorespiratory fitness.21,22

A translated version of the Voorrips23 physical activity questionnaire was filled out by each subject, and household, sporting, and leisure activities were evaluated to yield a total physical activity score (low < 9.4, moderate 9.4–16.5, and high > 16.5).23 According to the total physical activity score, two groups of subjects were defined, one as sedentary (score < 9.4) and one as active (score > 9.4).

Physical examination and parity

Gender (0, male; 1, female) was noted and age (years) was verified by identity cards. Height (±0.01 m) was measured with a height gauge with shoes removed, heels joined, and back straight. Weight (±1 kg) was measured, and the body mass index (BMI, weight/height2, kg/m2) was calculated. The following definitions were adopted:24 underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0); with three classes: moderated (BMI 30.0–34.9), marked (BMI 35.0–39.9), and extreme (BMI ≥ 40.0). Two patient groups were defined (0, nonobese [BMI < 30]; 1, obese [BMI ≥ 30]).

Parity referred to the number of offspring. Two parity subgroups were identified: low and high (parity < 5 and ≥5, respectively).14

Electrocardiogram (ECG) and absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR) score

A 12-lead resting ECG was performed at baseline. Left ventricular hypertrophy was retained when the Sokolow–Lyon index was higher than 35 mm.25 The ACVDR is the summation of the risk factors, each one being regarded as binary (present or absent) and having an identical weight (Appendix Table 1). An abnormal reading was not considered as a reason for excluding patients.

Table A1

Calculation of absolute cardiovascular disease risk32

	Score
Age ≥ 50 years for males	+1
Age ≥ 60 years for females
Family history of premature coronary heart disease: Myocardial infarction or sudden death < 55 years with the father or a relative of first degree of male gender Myocardial infarction or sudden death < 65 years with the mother or a relative of first degree of female gender	+1
Current smoking or stopped less than 3 years	+1
Treated or untreated permanent arterial hypertension	+1
Presence of left ventricular hypertrophy	+1
Treated or untreated non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus	+1
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≤ 1.0 mmol/L	+1
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 1.5 mmol/L	−1

Metabolic data and definitions and diagnosis of NIDDM

Glycemia (mmol/L), total cholesterol (mmol/L), and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, mmol/L) were quantified by spectrophotometry. Triglycerides (mmol/L) were quantified by the enzymatic colorimetric method. Low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, mmol/L) was calculated.26 HbA1c (percentage) was quantified on hemolysed total blood (turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay).

NIDDM diagnosis was done according to international criteria:27 clinical signs of diabetes and randomly measured glycemia ≥ 11.11 mmol/L or glycemia 2 hours after a caused oral hyperglycemia ≥ 11.11 mmol/L or a twice fasting glycemia ≥ 7.00 mmol/L.

The following metabolic definitions were applied. A rate of HbA1c > 7% shows an unbalanced NIDDM during the last 3 months,9 and two groups of patients were identified (0, unbalanced; 1, balanced). Triglycerides ≥ 1.7 mmol/L and/or HDL-C < 1 mmol/L and/or LDL-C ≥ 4.1 mmol/L diagnoses “measured” dyslipidemia,26 and two groups of patients were defined (0, measured dyslipidemia; 1, no measured dyslipidemia).

6MWT procedure, dyspnea evaluation, applied definitions

The 6MWT was conducted according to a standardized protocol.6 The test was conducted along a seldom-traveled, flat, straight corridor (40 m long, marked every 1 m with cones to indicate turnaround points) with a hard surface. To minimize intraday variability, temperature effects, and biological rhythms, the 6MWT was performed between 8 am and 10 am, a period characterized by a stable ambient temperature of 16°C–20°C. All subjects performed the 6MWT for the first time with no warm-up period and no encouragement. Subjects were told to avoid vigorous exercise in the 2 hours prior to testing, to wear comfortable clothes and appropriate walking shoes, and to continue their usual medication.6 The subjects sat in a chair located near the starting position for at least 10 minutes before the test started. During this time, dyspnea (visual analogue scale [VAS]), heart rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation (oxy-sat) (finger pulse oximeter; Nonin Medical, Minneapolis, MN) and systolic and diastolic pressures (SP, DP, respectively) were measured at rest (rest). The test instructions to the subjects were those recommended by the American Thoracic Society.6 At the end (end) of the 6MWT, the same data, in addition to 6MWD, were measured. Recommended reasons for immediately stopping the 6MWT include the following: chest pain, intolerable dyspnea, leg cramps, staggering, diaphoresis, and pale or ashen appearance.6 In addition to 6MWD (m, %), dyspnea, SP and DP (mmHg), heart rate (bpm, % of predicted maximal heart rate [= 208 – 0.7 × age]), oxy-sat, delta oxy-sat [Δoxy-sat = oxy-sat{rest–end}], and the number of stops during the 6MWT were noted/calculated. The 6MWD reference values were calculated according to local norms:14 6MWD (m) = 720.50 – 160.27 × gender (0, male; 1, female) – 5.14 × age (years) – 2.23 × weight (kg) + 272.00 × height (m).

Since the 6MWT evaluates the integrated answer of the cardiorespiratory and muscular chain,6 we calculated the “estimated age” of this chain:14 estimated “cardiorespiratory and muscular chain” age (years) = 140.1751 – 0.1945 × measured 6MWD (m) – 31.1809 × gender (0, male; 1, female) – 0.4338 × weight (kg) + 52.9183 × height (m).

Dyspnea during the 6MWT was evaluated by VAS, which allows an easy evaluation of exercise dyspnea.28 It is about an open segment whose two ends are the absence of breathlessness and the maximum breathlessness. It was built on a slate for writing with dry erasable felt. Subjects read a standardized text in Arabic explaining dyspnea (or were read to, if they were illiterate) before each 6MWT. At the beginning and right at the end of the 6MWT, the subject indicated his level of breathlessness by marking with his index finger a vertical feature on the VAS. Dyspnea was then quantified from zero (no breathlessness) to ten (maximum of breathlessness).

The following definitions were applied:

A 6MWD lower than 82% was considered a “clinically significant abnormal value” and showed walk intolerance.29

Stopping during the 6MWT was regarded as an intolerance sign.14

A Δoxy-sat > 5 points defines a “clinically significant desaturation.”14

Any dyspneaend > 5/10 was considered as “clinically significant” and showed walk intolerance.28

A heart rateend < 60% was considered a chronotropic insufficiency.14

Study conduct

First visit (day 1): presentation of the patient to the Physiology Department, signature of consent, medical and physical activity questionnaires, anthropometric data, and baseline ECG.

Second visit (day 2): fasting blood sample, food intake (a cup of mineral water and some dates), VAS explanation; resting dyspnea, blood pressure, oxy-sat and heart rate, checks of the absence of 6MWT contraindications, 6MWT practice between 8 am and 10 am.

Data analysis

Expression modes of results

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analyse distribution of variables.15 When the distribution is normal and the variances are equal, the results are expressed by their means ± standards deviations (SD). If the distribution isn’t normal, the results are expressed by their medians (first–third quartiles). The chi-squared test was used to compare percentages.

NIDDM PG: comparison of 6MWT measured data, univariate and multiple regression analysis (influencing factors)

The dependent variable (6MWD) was normally distributed. Student’s t-test was used to compare measured versus theoretical 6MWD, resting versus 6MWTend data, and to evaluate the associations between measured 6MWD (m) and categorical variables (0, no; 1, yes) for cigarette or narghile use, chronic respiratory disease, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, thyroid dysfunction, diabetic retinopathy, history of abdominopelvic and/or thoracic and/or neurological surgeries, beta-blocker or diuretic use, sedentary status, obesity group, diabetes balance, measured dyslipidemia, and left ventricular hypertrophy; (0, low; 1, high) for SEL, SL, parity, and (0, male; 1, female) for gender.

Pearson product-moment correlation (r) evaluated the associations between the measured 6MWD (m) and continuous measures (physical activity score, age [years], weight [kg], height [m], BMI [kg/m2], parity [numerical], fasting glycemia [mmol/L], HbA1c [%], triglycerides [mmol/L], total cholesterol [mmol/L], HDL-C [mmol/L], LDL-C [mmol/L], ACVDR score, dyspnearest, heart raterest [bpm], SPrest [mmHg], DPrest [mmHg], and oxy-satrest [%]). The linearity of the association between the 6MWD and the continuous measures was graphically checked by plotting each regressor against 6MWD. Only significantly and linearly associated variables were entered into the model.

A linear regression model was used to evaluate the independent variables explaining the variance in 6MWD. Candidate variables were stepped into the model with a stepwise selection method. To determine entry and removal from the model, significance levels of 0.15 and 0.05, respectively, were used. No colinearity between predictors was detected with variance inflation factors. The linear regression equation model is the following: 6MWD (m) = B1 × categorical variable1 + B2 × categorical variable2 + Bn × categorical variablen + B1 × continuous variable1 + B2 × continuous variable2 + Bn × continuous variablen + constant. B is the nonstandardized regression coefficient.

Comparison of NIDDM PG versus CG data

t-tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare quantitative data and percentages, respectively. In the same way, an analysis of variance was carried out between the four groups.

Analyses were carried out using Statistica software (Statistica Kernel version 6; StatSoft, Paris, France). Significance was set at the 0.05 level.

Results

Patient group: noninclusion criteria, clinical, anthropometric, and metabolic characteristics

An initial sample of 123 volunteer adults was examined. Noninclusion criteria, presented in detail in the Appendix, were found in 23 subjects.

Table 1 exposes the clinical, anthropometric, and metabolic characteristics of the NIDDM PG. Compared to males, there are significantly fewer female cigarette or narghile users, more females having thyroid dysfunction or with surgical history, or having low SEL, SL, or having sedentary status, there are fewer overweight females, but a higher percentage of obese females. Compared to males, females have a significantly higher BMI and LDL-C level, a lower ACVDR score and are significantly shorter.

Table 1

Clinical, anthropometric, and metabolic characteristics of the non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patient group

	Females (n = 45)	Males (n = 55)	Total sample (n = 100)
Smoking status, medical, surgical and obstetric history, current medication (n)
Cigarette use	1	37**	38
Narghile use	0	8**	8
Chronic respiratory diseases	3	7	10
Arterial hypertension	20	17	37
Dyslipidemia	8	6	14
Cardiovascular diseases	3	4	7
Dysthyroid	4	0**	4
Diabetic retinopathy	3	5	8
Renal failure	0	1	1
Anemia	2	1	3
Surgical history	17	8**	25
Low parity	34
Beta-blocker use	6	4	10
Diuretic use	3	1	4
Bronchodilator use	2	0	2
Socioeconomic, schooling, and physical activity levels (n)
Low socioeconomic level	27	9**	36
Low schooling level	22	15**	37
Sedentary status	32	18**	50
Daily, sporting, leisure, and physical activity scores, parity [median (1st–3rd quartile)]
Activities
Daily	2 (2–2)	1 (1–2)*	2 (1–2)
Sporting	2 (0–7)	8 (3–13)*	6 (1–11)
Leisure	1 (1–2)	2 (1–4)*	2 (1–3)
Physical	6 (4–11)	13 (7–18)*	9 (5–15)
Parity (numerical)	3 (2–4)
Anthropometric data (mean ± SD)
Age (years)	55 ± 8	54 ± 8	54 ± 8
Weight (kg)	80 ± 16	82 ± 11	81 ± 14
Height (m)	1.56 ± 0.06	1.70 ± 0.06*	1.64 ± 0.09
Body mass index (kg/m2)	33 ± 6	28 ± 4*	30 ± 5
Metabolic data and absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR) score (mean ± SD)
Fasting glycemia (mmol/L)	9.50 ± 3.24	9.47 ± 2.72	9.49 ± 2.95
Glycated hemoglobin (%)	8 ± 2	8 ± 2	8 ± 2
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	1.47 ± 0.78	1.86 ± 1.50	1.68 ± 1.24
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)	5.04 ± 1.01	4.78 ± 0.78	4.90 ± 0.89
HDL-C (mmol/L)	1.08 ± 0.30	1.06 ± 0.32	1.07 ± 0.31
LDL-C (mmol/L)	3.27 ± 0.92	2.87 ± 0.73*	3.05 ± 0.85
ACVDR score	2 ± 1	4 ± 1*	3 ± 1
Normal weight, overweight, and obese (number)
Normal weight	5	9	14
Overweight	9	29**	38
Obese
Moderate	16	15	31
Marked	10	2**	12
Extreme	5	0**	5
Three degrees of obesity	31	17**	48
Metabolic characteristics (number)
Uncontrolled diabetes	25	33	58
“Measured” dyslipidemia	30	37	67

Notes:

P (probability, t-test) < 0.05, females vs males;

P (probability, chi-squared test) < 0.05, females vs males.

Abbreviations: HDL-C, high-density-lipid cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density-lipid cholesterol.

The 6MWD of the 45 females and 55 males, according to age-group, is shown in Appendix Figure 1. Few older patients aged 65 years and more are included (four females and four males).

Figure A1

The measured 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) of subgroups of non-insulin-dependent-diabetes mellitus males and females, according to age-group.

Notes: Data are shown as box-and-whisker plots illustrating the mean ± standard deviation; P, comparison male versus female (paired t-test).

Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

Additional information about the PG total sample characteristics are detailed in the Appendix.

PG: 6MWT data and profile

The 6MWT data are shown in Table 2. The total-sample measured 6MWD (566 ± 81 m) was significantly lower than the theoretical one (90% ± 12%). This difference of about 86 m was observed only in males. For females, males, and total sample, and compared to resting data, there was a significant increase in 6MWTend SP, DP, and dyspnea. Oxy-sat significantly decreased only in males.

Table 2

Six-minute walk test (6MWT) data of the non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patient group

	Females (n = 45)		Males (n = 55)		Total sample (n = 100)
	Rest	End	Rest	End	Rest	End
Heart rate
(bpm)	81 ± 12	118 ± 19#	78 ± 13	113 ± 20#	79 ± 13	115 ± 19#
(%)	47 ± 7	69 ± 10#	46 ± 8	67 ± 12#	46 ± 7	68 ± 11#
6MWD
(m)	513 ± 63		609 ± 67*		566 ± 81
(%)	98 ± 11		84 ± 9*,†		90 ± 12†
Oxy-sat (%)	98 (97–98)	98 (97–98)	98 (98–98)	98 (97–98)#	98 (97–98)	98 (97–98)
Systolic pressure (mmHg)	130 (120–140)	150 (140–160)#	130 (120–140)	150 (130–160)#	130 (120–140)	150 (140–160)#
Diastolic pressure (mmHg)	80 (80–80)	80 (80–90)#	80 (70–80)	80 (80–90)#	80 (75–80)	80 (80–90)#
Dyspnea (VAS)	0 (0–0)	2 (1–4)#	0 (0–0)	2 (0–3)#	0 (0–0)	2 (1–3)#

Notes:

P (probability, t-test) < 0.05, females vs males;

P (probability, t-test) < 0.05, “rest vs end” 6MWT;

P (probability, t-test) < 0.05, “measured vs theoretical” 6MWD; data are means for heart rate and 6MWD and medians (1st–3rd quartiles) for others.

Abbreviations: 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; VAS, visual analog scale; bpm, beats per minute; oxy-sat, oxyhemoglobin saturation.

NIDDM patient profile during the 6MWT were as follows: 2% (1% females) stopped once during the 6MWT; 4% (2% females) showed a clinically significant desaturation; 12% (7% females) expressed a clinically significant dyspneaend; 21% (10% females) had a chronotropic insufficiency; and 23% (2% females) had an abnormal 6MWD.

PG: univariate and multiple regression analysis: influencing factors

Gender significantly affected the 6MWD (Table 2). On average, the 6MWD values were 96 m greater (significant) in males when compared to females. This difference applies to patients aged between 45 and 60 years and more than 65 years (Appendix Figure 1).

Univariate analysis between 6MWD and patient data is shown in the Appendix Table 2. In the total sample, the following categorical variables significantly affected the 6MWD: cigarette use, surgical history, SEL, SL, physical activity level, and obesity. In the total sample, 6MWD was significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with the following continuous variables: age; height; BMI; daily, sporting, leisure, and physical activity scores; ACVDR score; SPrest; and oxy-satrest. Several factors did not independently explain the variability of 6MWD, such as metabolic data.

Table A2

Univariate analysis between 6-minute walk distance and the non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients’ group data

	Females (n = 45)	Males (n = 55)	Total sample (n = 100)
Smoking status, medical, surgical, and obstetric history
Cigarette use
Yes	Not done	595 ± 59	597 ± 59
No		637 ± 75*	547 ± 86*
Narghile use
Yes	Not done	608 ± 69	616 ± 54
No		616 ± 54	562 ± 81
Chronic respiratory diseases
Yes	562 ± 31	588 ± 46	580 ± 42
No	510 ± 64	612 ± 69	564 ± 84
Arterial hypertension
Yes	521 ± 42	587 ± 53	551 ± 58
No	507 ± 76	619 ± 71	574 ± 91
Dyslipidemia
Yes	514 ± 69	607 ± 86	554 ± 88
No	513 ± 63	609 ± 65	568 ± 80
Cardiovascular diseases
Yes	471 ± 96	571 ± 91	528 ± 100
No	516 ± 61	612 ± 65	569 ± 79
Dysthyroid
Yes	537 ± 15	Not done	537 ± 15
No	511 ± 66		567 ± 82
Diabetic retinopathy
Yes	461 ± 101	577 ± 47	534 ± 88
No	577 ± 60	612 ± 68	569 ± 80
Surgical history
Yes	497 ± 69	595 ± 69	528 ± 82
No	523 ± 52	611 ± 67	578 ± 25*
Parity
Low	528 ± 52
High	467 ± 74*
Medication use
Beta-blocker use
Yes	491 ± 66	593 ± 43	532 ± 76
No	517 ± 63	610 ± 69	570 ± 81
Diuretic use
Yes	551 ± 43	Not done	571 ± 54
No	511 ± 64		566 ± 82
Socioeconomic, schooling, and physical activity levels
Socioeconomic level
Low	497 ± 66	590 ± 50	520 ± 74
High	539 ± 52*	613 ± 70	592 ± 73*
Schooling level
Low	494 ± 65	601 ± 50	537 ± 80
High	532 ± 56*	612 ± 73	583 ± 77*
Physical activity level
Sedentary	502 ± 62	616 ± 71	543 ± 69
Active	542 ± 59	605 ± 66	589 ± 69*
Metabolic characteristics
Obesity
Yes	511 ± 57	584 ± 47	537 ± 64
No	518 ± 78	620 ± 72	592 ± 86*
Uncontrolled diabetes
Yes	504 ± 74	606 ± 64	562 ± 85
No	515 ± 47	613 ± 73	571 ± 75
Measured dyslipidemia
Yes	511 ± 58	610 ± 76	565 ± 84
No	519 ± 75	608 ± 47	567 ± 75
Anthropometric data and parity
Age (years)	−0.54**	−0.25**	−0,34**
Weight (kg)	0.09	−0.10	0.03
Height (m)	0.24	0.20	0.57**
Body mass index (kg/m2)	0.02	−0.22	−0.31**
Parity (numerical)	−0.44**
Metabolic data
Fasting glycemia (mmol/L)	0.05	−0.03	0.01
Glycated hemoglobin (%)	−0.16	0.06	0.01
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	−0.04	0.09	0.13
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)	0.01	0.23	0.01
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)	−0.08	0.16	0.03
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)	0.04	0.09	−0.09
Physical activity and absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR) scores
Activities
Daily	−0.11	0.02	−0.36**
Sporting	0.16	−0.18	0.19**
Leisure	0.07	0.28**	0.31**
Physical	0.15	−0.05	0.24**
ACVDR score	0.04	−0.28**	0.21**
6MWT resting data
Dyspnea (VAS)	0.23	−0.21	−0.05
Heart rate (bpm)	0.29**	−0.17	−0.04
Systolic pressure (mmHg)	−0.04	−0.30**	−0.20**
Diastolic pressure (mmHg)	0.25	−0.21	−0.01
Oxy-sat (%)	0.18	0.29**	0.21**

Notes: Data are expressed in means ± standard deviation;

P (probability, t-test) < 0.05;

P (coefficient of correlation) < 0.05.

Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; 6MWT, 6-minute walk test; VAS, visual analog scale; bpm, beats per minute; oxy-sat, oxyhemoglobin saturation.

Table 3 presents the cumulative determination coefficient (r2) of the independent factors included in the 6MWD forward linear stepwise multiple regressions. For the total sample, gender, age, leisure activity score, obesity, SEL, cigarette use, and oxy-satrest were independent predictors, and up to 58% of the 6MWD variability could be explained with the proposed model in Table 3.

Table 3

Independent variables included in the forward linear stepwise multiple regression model for the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) of the non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patient group

Independent variables	B	95% CI	Cumulative r2
Females (n = 45)
Constant	714.54	630.01–799.07
Age (years)	−3.51	−5.12 to −1.90	0.297
Socioeconomic level (0, low; 1, high)	29.44	2.79–56.09	0.382
Parity (numerical)	−6.09	−12.85–0.67	0.413
Males (n = 55)
Constant	−234.62	−1307.93–838.69
Systolic pressurerest (mmHg)	−0.90	−2.03–0.24	0.091
Leisure activity score	8.88	3.40–14.36	0.166
Cigarette use* (0, no; 1, yes)	−38.35	−65.73 to −10.98	0.234
Oxy-satrest (%)	10.90	0.24–1.56	0.292
Physical activity score	−1.80	−3.89–0.28	0.317
Age (years)	−1.57	−3.39–0.26	0.344
Total sample (n = 100)
Constant	−105.48	−973.64–762.69
Gender (0, male; 1, female)	−73.94	−101.23 to −46.65	0.350
Age (years)	−3.25	−4.43 to −2.07	0.446
Leisure activity score	7.33	3.22–11.45	0.485
Obesity** (0, no; 1, yes)	−35.57	−55.35 to −15.79	0.528
Socioeconomic level (0, low; 1, high)	32.86	11.84–53.87	0.554
Cigarette use* (0, no; 1, yes)	−27.67	−52.49 to −2.86	0.568
Oxy-satrest (%)	8.89	0.17–17.61	0.580

Notes: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval around each B;

cigarette use: 0, no (use ≤ 2 pack-years); 1, yes (use > 2 pack-years);

obesity: 0, no (BMI < 30 kg/m2); 1, yes (BMI ≥ 30 kgm2); proposed model for the NIDDM total sample: 6MWD (m) = −73.94 × gender (0, male, 1, female) − 3.25 × age (years) + 7.33 × leisure-activity score − 35.57 × obesity (0, no; 1, yes) + 32.86 × socioeconomic level (0, low; 1, high) − 27.67 × cigarette use (0, no; 1, yes) + 8.89 × oxy-satrest − 105.48.

Abbreviation: oxy-sat, oxyhemoglobin saturation.

PG: “cardiorespiratory and muscular chain” estimated age

In the total sample, the “cardiorespiratory and muscular chain” estimated age was significantly higher than the chronological age (68 ± 16 years versus 54 ± 8 years, respectively; P < 0.05). This difference existed only in males (76 ± 13 years versus 54 ± 8 years, respectively; P < 0.05).

PG: characteristics of patients distributed according to the 6MWD (normal versus abnormal 6MWD)

Table 4 presents the characteristics of the two groups of patients with abnormal 6MWD (21 males, 2 females) and normal 6MWD (34 males, 43 females). Compared to the group having a normal 6MWD (94% ± 10%), the group having abnormal 6MWD (76% ± 5%), is significantly younger and taller, contains a significantly higher percentage of patients using cigarettes or having measured dyslipidemia, and has a higher ACVDR score.

Table 4

Characteristics of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients, divided according to their 6MWD (Group 1, abnormal 6MWD; Group 2: normal 6MWD)

	Group 1 (n = 23)	Group 2 (n = 77)
Smoking, physical activity and absolute cardiovascular disease risk (ACVDR) scores, anthropometric, metabolic and resting 6MWT data (mean ± SD)
Cigarette use (pack-years)	21 ± 13	19 ± 14
Narghile use (narghile-years)	26 ± 49	20 ± 28
Age (years)	51 ± 6	55 ± 8*
Weight (kg)	84 ± 12	80 ± 14
Height (m)	1.69 ± 0.06	1.63 ± 0.09*
Body mass index (kg/m2)	30 ± 4	30 ± 5
Glycated hemoglobin (%)	7.75 ± 2.16	7.88 ± 2.12
Fasting glycemia (mmol/L)	9.69 ± 3.00	9.42 ± 2.95
Triglycerides (mmol/L)	2.00 ± 1.30	1.59 ± 1.21
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)	4.70 ± 0.73	4.96 ± 0.93
HDL-C (mmol/L)	0.97 ± 0.20	1.10 ± 0.33
LDL-C (mmol/L)	2.81 ± 0.83	3.12 ± 0.84
Physical activity score	13 ± 7	10 ± 6
ACVDR score	4 ± 1	3 ± 1*
Dyspnea (VAS)	0 ± 0	0 ± 0
Heart rate (%)	46 ± 8	47 ± 7
Systolic pressure (mmHg)	129 ± 9	130 ± 14
Diastolic pressure (mmHg)	80 ± 6	79 ± 8
Oxy-sat (%)	98 ± 1	98 ± 1
6MWD
(m)	544 ± 55	573 ± 86
(%)	76 ± 5	94 ± 10*
Percentage of patients with the following characteristics
Cigarette use	83%	25%**
Narghile use	17%	5%
Chronic respiratory diseases	4%	12%
Arterial hypertension	30%	39%
Cardiovascular diseases	13%	5%
Diabetic retinopathy	7%	8%
Surgical history	17%	27%
Beta-blocker use	0%	13%
Low socioeconomic level	30%	38%
Low schooling level	30%	39%
Sedentary status	35%	55%
Obesity	48%	48%
Uncontrolled diabetes	57%	58%
Dyslipidemia history	17%	13%
“Measured” dyslipidemia	87%	61%**

Notes:

P (probability, t-test) < 0.05;

P (probability, chi-squared test) < 0.05.

Abbreviations: 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; 6MWT, 6-minute walk test; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VAS, visual analog scale; oxy-sat, oxyhemoglobin saturation.

PG: parity effect

In the entire female population (n = 45), a negative univariate linear correlation was found between parity (numerical) and 6MWD (r = −0.44; P < 0.05), and on average the 6MWD value was 61 m greater in females having low parity (Appendix Table 2). Parity also appeared to be a negative independent variable included in the forward linear stepwise multiple regression model for 6MWD (Table 3).

Comparison of NIDDM PG versus CG data

Table 5 presents the characteristics of the PG and CGs. Analysis of the total samples 6MWDs revealed that compared to CG1 (636 ± 112 m, 100% ± 9%), to CG2 (100% ± 8%), and to CG3 (507 ± 129 m, 83% ± 14%), the PG (566 ± 81 m, 90% ± 12%) had a significantly lower 6MWD (m, %), lower 6MWD (%), and higher 6MWD (m, %), respectively. Detailed information appears in the Appendix.

Table 5

Comparison of patient group (PG) data with those of three control groups (CG): CG1 (healthy nonobese and nonsmoking); CG2 (nondiabetic obese free from comorbidities); and CG3 (“all comers” – nondiabetics)

	Females				Males				Total sample
	PG (n = 45)	CG1 (n = 87)	CG2 (n = 38)	CG3 (n = 22)	PG (n = 55)	CG1 (n = 87)	CG2 (n = 17)	CG3 (n = 37)	PG (n = 100)	CG1 (n = 174)	CG2 (n = 55)	CG3 (n = 59)
Data are means ± standard deviation
Cigarette use (PY)	2 ± 1δ	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	0 ± 0#	21 ± 13	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	20 ± 22	20 ± 13	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	13 ± 20
Narghile use (NY)	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	23 ± 38δ	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	2 ± 8#	23 ± 38δ	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	1 ± 6#
Physical-activity score	8 ± 5δ	5 ± 4*	4 ± 2†	Not done	13 ± 7δ	7 ± 6*	7 ± 4†	Not done	11 ± 7δ	6 ± 5*	5 ± 3†	Not done
Age (years)	55 ± 8δ	56 ± 10	53 ± 10	61 ± 10#	54 ± 8	58 ± 11*	57 ± 11	56 ± 12	54 ± 8δ	57 ± 10*	54 ± 10	58 ± 12#
Weight (kg)	80 ± 16δ	63 ± 8*	79 ± 6	80 ± 15	82 ± 11δ	77 ± 9*	90 ± 9†	92 ± 22#	81 ± 14δ	70 ± 11*	82 ± 9	87 ± 20#
Height (m)	1.56 ± 0.06	1.56 ± 0.07	1.57 ± 0.05	1.54 ± 0.06	1.70 ± 0.06	1.70 ± 0.06	1.68 ± 0.08	1.69 ± 0.07	1.64 ± 0.09	1.63 ± 0.10	1.61 ± 0.08†	1.63 ± 0.10
Body mass index (kg/m2)	33 ± 6δ	26 ± 2*	32 ± 1	34 ± 6	28 ± 4δ	26 ± 2*	32 ± 1†	32 ± 7#	30 ± 5δ	26 ± 2*	32 ± 1†	33 ± 6#
Parity (numerical)	4 ± 2δ	6 ± 3*	6 ± 2†	5 ± 3#
Dyspnearest (VAS)	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0 ± 0δ	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	1 ± 1#	0 ± 0δ	0 ± 0	0 ± 0	0 ± 1#
Dyspneaend (VAS)	3 ± 2δ	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	5 ± 2#	2 ± 2δ	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	4 ± 2#	2 ± 2δ	0 ± 0*	0 ± 0†	4 ± 2#
Heart raterest (%)	47 ± 7δ	45 ± 5*	46 ± 6	50 ± 7	46 ± 8	48 ± 6*	48 ± 6	47 ± 6	46 ± 7	47 ± 6	47 ± 6	48 ± 7
Heart rateend (%)	69 ± 10	71 ± 9	73 ± 10	68 ± 11	67 ± 12δ	87 ± 11*	85 ± 12†	73 ± 11#	68 ± 11δ	79 ± 13*	77 ± 12†	71 ± 11
Systolic pressurerest (mmHg)	131 ± 14δ	123 ± 16*	126 ± 13	139 ± 29	129 ± 12	136 ± 22*	132 ± 16	136 ± 20#	130 ± 13δ	130 ± 21	128 ± 14	137 ± 24#
Systolic pressureend (mmHg)	150 ± 17δ	152 ± 27	164 ± 25†	165 ± 31#	147 ± 16δ	176 ± 36*	178 ± 36†	158 ± 37	148 ± 16δ	164 ± 34*	168 ± 29†	161 ± 35#
Diastolic pressurerest (mmHg)	80 ± 9δ	72 ± 13*	76 ± 11	83 ± 19	79 ± 7	81 ± 16	76 ± 15	83 ± 11#	79 ± 8δ	76 ± 15	76 ± 13	83 ± 14#
Diastolic pressureend (mmHg)	86 ± 12δ	76 ± 13*	83 ± 11	91 ± 16	87 ± 9δ	79 ± 20*	87 ± 26	91 ± 14	86 ± 11δ	78 ± 17*	84 ± 17	91 ± 15#
Oxy-satrest (%)	98 ± 1δ	98 ± 1	97 ± 1†	96 ± 2#	98 ± 1δ	98 ± 1	97 ± 1	96 ± 2#	98 ± 1δ	98 ± 1	97 ± 1†	96 ± 2#
Oxy-satend (%)	97 ± 2δ	98 ± 1	97 ± 2	94 ± 5#	97 ± 2δ	97 ± 1	97 ± 1	94 ± 6#	97 ± 2δ	97 ± 1	97 ± 1	94 ± 5#
6MWD
(m)	513 ± 63δ	556 ± 75*	538 ± 73	398 ± 98#	609 ± 67δ	716 ± 82*	688 ± 72†	572 ± 97#	566 ± 81δ	636 ± 112*	585 ± 100	507 ± 129#
(%)	98 ± 11δ	100 ± 10	100 ± 8	82 ± 18#	84 ± 9δ	100 ± 8*	101 ± 7†	83 ± 11	90 ± 12δ	100 ± 9*	100 ± 8†	83 ± 14#
Percentage of patients with the following characteristics
Cigarette use	2%	0%	0%	0%	67%	0%*	0%†	68%	38%	0%*	0%†	42%
Narghile use	0%	0%	0%	0%	15%	0%*	0%†	16%	8%	0%*	0%†	10%
Chronic respiratory diseases	7%	0%*	0%†	82%#	13%	0%*	0%	63%#	10%	0%*	0%†	69%#
Arterial hypertension	44%	0%*	0%†	41%	31%	0%*	0%†	24%	37%	0%*	0%†	31%
Dyslipidemia history	18%	0%*	0%†		11%	0%*	0%		14%	0%*	0%†
Cardiovascular diseases	7%	0%*	0%†	14%	7%	0%*	0%	16%	7%	0%*	0%†	15%
Surgery history	38%	0%*	0%†	14%#	15%	0%*	0%†	3%#	25%	0%*	0%†	7%#
Beta-blocker use	13%	0%*	0%†	18%	7%	0%*	0%	5%	10%	0%*	0%†	10%
Low socioeconomic level	60%	70%	76%	91%#	16%	13%	59%†	19%	36%	41%	71%†	46%
Low schooling level	49%	70%*	66%	Not done	27%	53%*	12%	Not done	37%	61%*	49%	Not done
Sedentary status	71%	87%*	95%†	Not done	33%	72%*	71%†	Not done	50%	80%*	87%†	Not done
Obesity	69%	0%*	100%†	82%	31%	0%*	100%†	68%#	48%	0%*	100%†	73%#

Notes:

P < 0.05 (probability, t-test or chi-squared test), PG vs CG1;

P < 0.05 (probability, t-test or chi-squared test), PG vs CG2;

P < 0.05 (probability, t-test or chi-squared test), PG vs CG3;

analysis of variance.

Abbreviations: 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; oxy-sat, oxyhemoglobin saturation; PY, pack-years: NY, narghile-years; VAS, visual analogue scale.

Discussion

The 6MWT profile of a large group of NIDDM patients older than 40 years was evaluated. It seems that NIDDM accelerates “cardiorespiratory and muscle chain” aging, with 23% of patients having an abnormal 6MWD. Impaired submaximal aerobic capacity is more pronounced in females and/or in the elderly and/or in subjects having low leisure activity score and/or in obese patients and/or in patients having low SEL and/or in cigarette smokers and/or in subjects having low resting oxy-sat. Compared to healthy nonobese and nonsmoking or nondiabetic obese control groups, NIDDM patients group had a significantly lower 6MWD.

Study design and statistical analysis

Detailed discussion of the recruitment method, the inclusion and noninclusion criteria, the sample size, and the questionnaires used appears in the Appendix. The number of measures and comparisons (n = 36) was too large for the number of participants included in the present study, usually one variable for ten participants.

Justification of the 6MWT choice to evaluate submaximal aerobic capacity

Exercise tolerance is usually expressed in terms of maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) measured during a cardiorespiratory test realized under optimal safety conditions and in the presence of a physician and a technician.30 However, the cardiorespiratory test has some drawbacks. First, it uses expensive and sophisticated equipment, demanding that it be operated by highly qualified personnel.6 Thus the repeated use of such a test for assessment of exercise training represents a significant financial cost.6,31 Second, the complexity of the examination and its interpretation does not allow the patient to have a quick and convenient representation of its progress.6 Finally, this test can’t be done on a large scale.6 These drawbacks lead us to turn to the tests called “low-tech,” such as the 6MWT (reliable, valid, safe, inexpensive, feasible on a large scale, can be performed by a physician, or a nurse, physiotherapist, or teacher of adapted physical activities). It is used to assess exercise tolerance not only of chronic respiratory diseases but also those with heart32 or metabolic12,13 diseases. Another justification for our choice is that the 6MWT quantifies the ability to perform activities of daily life, familiar to subjects, and therefore supports the idea of submaximal activity. Finally, it is preferable to start as part of the assessment of exercise tolerance, by the practice of 6MWT and in case of an abnormal 6MWD, the cardiorespiratory test is largely indicated.6

Precautions taken during 6MWT

The 6MWT was performed in the open air in a corridor of 40 m length.6 Enright et al,12 and Ingle et al,13 used, respectively, corridors of 30 m and 15 m. Detailed discussion of the precautions taken during the 6MWT appears in the Appendix.

Characteristics of NIDDM PG

Our NIDDM sample can be considered as representative of the Northwest African population with NIDDM. Indeed, in our study, the frequency of risk factors and certain comorbidities observed were similar to those reported in other studies (Appendix Table 3).

Table A3

Frequency in the present study and in the literature of risk factors and certain comorbidities in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus33–36

	Frequency of the phenomenon in the present study	Prevalence of the phenomenon in the literature
Smoking (cigarettes, narghile)	46	64
Sedentary status	50	38
Low socioeconomic level	36	38
Obesity	48	52
Dyslipidemia	67	50
Arterial hypertension	37	49
Cardiovascular diseases	7	25
Chronic respiratory diseases	10	4.7
Diabetic retinopathy	8	29

Limitations of this study

In females, menopause and changes in hormonal status that may affect aerobic capacity33 haven’t been evaluated. Passive smoking has not been studied despite its adverse effects on exercise capacity, particularly as it reduces the lungs’ performance.34 We didn’t measure quadriceps strength or the leg length, known as 6MWD-influencing factors.29 In this study, we evaluated NIDDM patient deficiency by determining fasting glycemia, HbA1c, lipid profile, blood pressure, and ACVDR score. However, there are other biological markers such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis,35–40 which may cause disabilities through myopathy.41 Similarly, it was desirable to measure some morphological data (lower-limb length,29 muscle biopsy data,41 or lung function42). As part of exploration of incapacity, it was desirable to achieve in a number of our patients a cardiorespiratory test and to evaluate the correlation between V̇O2 max and 6MWD. As part of the exploration of social disadvantage, it was desirable to explore the QOL of our patients. However, to our knowledge, there is no validated Arabic version of the QOL questionnaire specific to NIDDM patients.43

Deterioration of submaximal aerobic capacity

Submaximal aerobic capacity of NIDDM patients seems to have deteriorated. Indeed, the measured 6MWD was 86 m less than the predicted one. In addition, almost one-quarter of our NIDDM patients had an abnormal 6MWD. Similarly, there were signs of walking intolerance (2% and 12% of patients stopped the walk and expressed a clinically significant dyspneaend, respectively). Finally, compared to healthy nonobese, nonsmokers and nondiabetic obese CGs, the PG had a significantly lower 6MWD.

Another key outcome of the present study is that the NIDDM accelerates the “cardiorespiratory and muscle chain” aging. It is an unwavering argument to motivate patients to better compliance with preventive and therapeutic measures. To our knowledge, this result has never been shown before.

Twenty-one percent of our patients had an impaired chronotropic heart response. This reflects the impact of NIDDM on the activity of the sinus node during the walk.44 Moreover, the ACVDR score of the group with abnormal 6MWD was significantly higher than the group with normal 6MWD (Table 4). This is an important argument to encourage patients with NIDDM to start regular exercise.45 Indeed, the exercise training and aerobic capacity were positively related to cardiovascular profile.45

To our knowledge, only two studies have examined the submaximal aerobic capacity of NIDDM patients.12,13 The first study, conducted in 2003 by Enright et al,12 aimed to establish 6MWD norms specific to the US population aged 68 years and more (n = 2117 subjects, 13% had NIDDM). The multiple linear regression model revealed that the NIDDM was an independent predictor that altered the 6MWD.12 These authors recommended the 6MWT to assess the impact of NIDDM and other comorbidities (cardiovascular or respiratory diseases, arthritis, cognitive dysfunction, depression, etc) on elderly submaximal aerobic capacity.12 The second study, a retrospective one, conducted in 2006 by Ingle et al,13 compared the 6MWD of four matched groups of patients (no statistical difference in age or gender): “heart failure with NIDDM” (n = 88) versus “heart failure free from NIDDM” (n = 88), “coronary artery disease with NIDDM” (n = 50) versus “coronary heart disease free from heart failure” (n = 50). These authors found that the 6MWD of the “heart failure with NIDDM” group (238 ± 124 m) was significantly lower than the 6MWD of the “heart failure free from NIDDM” (296 ± 131 m) and that the 6MWD of the “heart failure free from NIDDM” group (231 ± 139 m) was significantly lower than the 6MWD of the “coronary heart disease free from heart failure” group (283 ± 126 m).13 These authors found that NIDDM was an independent determinant of low submaximal aerobic capacity.13

How can we explain the impairment of submaximal aerobic capacity of NIDDM patients?

The first important point of the present study is that classical biological data (fasting glycemia, HbA1c, lipid) often used to monitor the development of NIDDM don’t appear as indicators of incapacity (Table 3 and Appendix Table 2). However, there is evidence that regular physical activity in NIDDM patients is associated with a significant improvement in glycemic control, particularly in HbA1c.45 Moreover, evaluation of NIDDM patient physical training programs is mainly based on the HbA1c changes.46–49

In the total sample (Table 5), the alteration of submaximal aerobic capacity is more pronounced in females and/or in the elderly and/or in subjects having a low leisure activity score and/or in obese patients and/or in patients having low socioeconomic level and/or in cigarette smokers and/or in subjects having low oxy-satrest. It is important to note that the suppression of the eight patients aged 65 years and more doesn’t significantly confound the total sample actual results. These factors, in addition to parity, will be analyzed one by one in the following sections.

Effect of gender

As in some healthy14,29 or patient12 adult populations, we found that females compared to males have a lower 6MWD (Table 3 and Appendix Table 2). One plausible explanation is that muscle mass and therefore maximum leg-muscle force is lower for females than males.50 Another plausible explanation is parity, known as a physiological factor, accelerating the healthy female’s 6MWD decline.14 Indeed, among NIDDM females, in addition to age and SEL, parity appears to be an independent factor influencing 6MWD (Table 3). Among healthy women aged more than 40 years, the 6MWD decreased by 9.58 m when parity increased by one unit (r = −0.39, P < 0.05).14 In our study, NIDDM accelerated this decline, since the 6MWD of NIDDM female subjects decreased by 13.38 m when parity increased by one unit (r = −0.44, P < 0.05).

Effect of age

As in most studies of healthy14,29 or patient51 adult populations, we found that age is a predictor of 6MWD decline. The potential physical decrease observed with aging is partly due to reduced muscle mass, strength, and endurance, thus defining sarcopenia.14 Indeed, from 40 years of age, muscle mass decreases by an average of 5% per decade.50

Effect of physical inactivity

Physical inactivity significantly influences healthy subjects’ 6MWD, which decreased by 2.30 m when the physical activity score decreased by one point.25 This decrease was more pronounced in NIDDM patients,52 since patients with low leisure-activity scores (sedentary status) had a lower 6MWD by of 7.33 m (Table 3). This result is an important argument to encourage NIDDM patients to start regular exercise.40

Effect of obesity

Obesity, especially the marked type, is predictive of 6MWD decline.6,29 Indeed, some authors14 have shown that healthy subjects’ 6MWD decreases by about 6 m when the BMI increases by one unit. In our study, being obese reduced 6MWD by 35.57 m (Table 3). This confirms once more the adverse effects of obesity on aerobic capacity,6 and suggests that the obesity–NIDDM association accelerates 6MWD decline. This result is an important argument to encourage NIDDM patients to start a diet and/or regular exercise.47

Effect of SEL

In a healthy Tunisian population, the SEL significantly influenced the 6MWD.14 Indeed, having a low SEL decreases the 6MWD by 12.78 m.14 Our study suggests that the onset of NIDDM in subjects having a low SEL accelerates the 6MWD decline since it reaches 32.86 m (Table 3).

Effect of smoking

It is well known that smoking causes aerobic capacity alteration.53 In our study, being a cigarette smoker decreased 6MWD by 27.67 m (Table 3), and the group with abnormal 6MWD had a significantly higher percentage of cigarette smokers (Table 4). This result, which confirms once again the harmful effects of smoking,54 is a very important point to encourage NIDDM patients to stop smoking.

Effect of resting oxy-sat

In our study, the greater the oxy-satrest was, the greater the 6MWD was (Table 5). In many chronic diseases, desaturation during a walk is an independent prognostic marker and is associated with a significant risk of mortality.55,56 For example, in pulmonary arterial hypertension, desaturation of more than 10% increased the mortality risk by 2.9.56 In NIDDM, the clinically significant desaturation observed in 4% of our nonsmoking patients free from chronic respiratory diseases can be explained by the impact of diabetes on lung function42 with impaired alveolar–capillary membrane.42

Effect of parity

6MWD was lower by 61 m in NIDDM females with high parity (Appendix Table 2). This result may be clinically relevant when interpreting 6MWT in females with NIDDM. A simple way to solve this problem would be to substract 61 m from the theoretical value of these females. This phenomenon may reflect the general findings about aging and parity effects on health.57 In fact, repeated gestations have been found to have potentially noxious effects on health, and several hypotheses, discussed in a previous paper,14 have been advanced (detailed discussion appears in the Appendix). Medical studies provide very little information on the influence of parity on exercise tolerance, however, and this may be a promising new direction for physiological and pathophysiological research, particularly for developing countries.

Other factors explaining the submaximal aerobic capacity decline

The aforementioned factors explain 58% of the total-sample 6MWD variability (Table 3), which means that 42% of the variability remains unexplained. What other factors not evaluated in the present study may affect the NIDDM patients’ 6MWD?

As was said in the sixteenth century by Paracelsus (1493–1541), who wrote that “diabetes is a systemic disease caused by the presence of an abnormal product in the blood. This would act on the kidneys and cause polyuria,”58 NIDDM can be considered a general disease with a metabolic starting point, the main pathophysiological mechanism being insulin resistance.27 As part of this systemic disease, we can discuss the myopathy as an altering factor of the submaximal aerobic capacity.41 This could be the result of numerous alterations, the main ones being inflammation,35,37,39 apoptosis,38 oxidative stress,36 abnormal glucose and lipid or oxidative enzyme59 metabolisms, abnormal microcirculation,60 or abnormal type of fiber.52 These factors are discussed in the Appendix.

In conclusion, NIDDM seems to accelerate the decline of the submaximal aerobic capacity evaluated through 6MWT data.