| Literature DB >> 36006234 |
Jiajia Zhang1, Jia Wei1, Isaac Yaw Massey1, Tangjian Peng2, Fei Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
Harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCBs) frequently occur in eutrophic freshwater ecosystems worldwide. Microcystins (MCs) are considered to be the most prominent and toxic metabolites during HCBs. MCs may be harmful to human and animal health through drinking water and recreational water. Biodegradation is eco-friendly, cost-effective and one of the most effective methods to remove MCs. Many novel MC-degrading bacteria and their potential for MCs degradation have been documented. However, it is a challenge to apply the free MC-degrading bacterial cells in natural environments due to the long-term operational instability and difficult recycling. Immobilization is the process of restricting the mobility of bacteria using carriers, which has several advantages as biocatalysts compared to free bacterial cells. Biological water treatment systems with microbial immobilization technology can potentially be utilized to treat MC-polluted wastewater. In this review article, various types of supporting materials and methods for microbial immobilization and the application of bacterial immobilization technology for the treatment of MCs-contaminated water are discussed. This article may further broaden the application of microbial immobilization technology to the bioremediation of MC-polluted environments.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradation; microbial immobilization; microcystins (MCs)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36006234 PMCID: PMC9416196 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14080573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 5.075
Figure 1General chemical structure of MCs. 1–7 signify seven amino acid residues. R1 and R2 in positions two and four are highly variable L-amino acids.
Figure 2Types of immobilization. (a) Entrapment; (b) Encapsulation; (c) Adsorption and (d) Covalent binding.
Application of immobilized microorganisms for removal of MCs.
| Microorganism | Carrier | Microcystins | Initial Concentration | Degradation Period | Degradation | Degradation Rate | Container | Condition | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACF-SA | MC-RR | 12 | 8 h | 100 | 7.6 × 102 | - | 30 °C, pH 7.0 | [ | |
| Fe3O4@CTS | MC-LR | 10 | 12 h | 100 | 6.5 × 105 | - | 30 °C, pH 7.2 | [ | |
|
| carbon nanotubes | MC-RR | 52.5 | within 24 h | 100 | 2.18 × 103 | flasks | 30 °C, pH 7.0 | [ |
| MC-LR | 29.5 | ||||||||
| B-9 | polyester (Fabios) | MC-RR | 0.2 | 24 h | 100 | 1.25 × 104 | Aeration bioreactor | 25 °C, pH 7.4 | [ |
| alginate | MC-LR | 0.035 | - | 100 | 100.3 | Column | (freshwater) | [ | |
| ceramic | [Dha7]MC-LR | 25 | 30 h | 100 | 8.3 × 102 | IAL-CHS bioreactor | 30 °C, pH 7.2 | [ | |
| K1 Kaldness media | MC-LR | 50 | 6 days | 93.75 | 3.5 × 102 | Fluidized bed biofilm reactor | 15–19 °C, pH 7.2 | [ | |
| K1 Kaldness media | MC-LR | 50 | 6 days | 90.24 | 34.72 | ||||
| deinking sludge + sand | MC-LR | 0.05 | 7 cycle study (49 days) | 87 ± 14 | - | sand filter | pH 6.4 (Lake water) | [ | |
| hemp fiber + sand | 82 ± 7 | pH 6.5 (Lake water) | |||||||
| paper-pulp dry sludge + sand | 78 ± 4 | pH 6.6 (Lake water) | |||||||
| rGO-coated sand | MC-LR | 50 | stage (3): 6 cycles | 91.4 ± 5.6 | - | sand filter | (Lake water) | [ | |
| sand | [Dha7]MC-LR | 5 | 7 d EBCT: not mentioned | 100 | - | slow sand filter | 30 °C, pH 7.2 | [ | |
| plastic medium | [Dha7]MC-LR | 0.025 | within 24 h | 100 | 1.04 | sterile bioreactor | 30 °C, pH 7.2 | [ | |
| RO membranes | MCs | 2 | 24 h | 100 | 83.33 | flasks | 27 °C, pH 7.2 | [ |