Literature DB >> 33069479

Challenges of using blooms of Microcystis spp. in animal feeds: A comprehensive review of nutritional, toxicological and microbial health evaluation.

Liang Chen1, John P Giesy2, Ondrej Adamovsky3, Zorica Svirčev4, Jussi Meriluoto4, Geoffrey A Codd5, Biljana Mijovic6, Ting Shi7, Xun Tuo8, Shang-Chun Li9, Bao-Zhu Pan10, Jun Chen11, Ping Xie12.   

Abstract

Microcystis spp., are Gram-negative, oxygenic, photosynthetic prokaryotes which use solar energy to convert carbon dioxide (CO2) and minerals into organic compounds and biomass. Eutrophication, rising CO2 concentrations and global warming are increasing Microcystis blooms globally. Due to its high availability and protein content, Microcystis biomass has been suggested as a protein source for animal feeds. This would reduce dependency on soybean and other agricultural crops and could make use of "waste" biomass when Microcystis scums and blooms are harvested. Besides proteins, Microcystis contain further nutrients including lipids, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals. However, Microcystis produce cyanobacterial toxins, including microcystins (MCs) and other bioactive metabolites, which present health hazards. In this review, challenges of using Microcystis blooms in feeds are identified. First, nutritional and toxicological (nutri-toxicogical) data, including toxicity of Microcystis to mollusks, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, mammals and birds, is reviewed. Inclusion of Microcystis in diets caused greater mortality, lesser growth, cachexia, histopathological changes and oxidative stress in liver, kidney, gill, intestine and spleen of several fish species. Estimated daily intake (EDI) of MCs in muscle of fish fed Microcystis might exceed the provisional tolerable daily intake (TDI) for humans, 0.04 μg/kg body mass (bm)/day, as established by the World Health Organization (WHO), and is thus not safe. Muscle of fish fed M. aeruginosa is of low nutritional value and exhibits poor palatability/taste. Microcystis also causes hepatotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity and immunotoxicity to mollusks, crustaceans, amphibians, mammals and birds. Microbial pathogens can also occur in blooms of Microcystis. Thus, cyanotoxins/xenobiotics/pathogens in Microcystis biomass should be removed/degraded/inactivated sufficiently to assure safety for use of the biomass as a primary/main/supplemental ingredient in animal feed. As an ameliorative measure, antidotes/detoxicants can be used to avoid/reduce the toxic effects. Before using Microcystis in feed ingredients/supplements, further screening for health protection and cost control is required.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidote; Blue-green algae; Cyanobacteria; Cyanotoxin; Feed; Hazardous algal bloom; Microcystin; Microcystis; Nutrition; Toxicity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33069479     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Genotoxicity of Natural Water during the Mass Development of Cyanobacteria Evaluated by the Allium Test Method: A Model Experiment with Microcosms.

Authors:  Dmitry S Pesnya; Svetlana A Kurbatova; Andrey N Sharov; Ekaterina N Chernova; Igor Y Yershov; Galina V Shurganova; Ekaterina L Vodeneeva
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Differences in Abnormal Water Metabolism between SD Rats and KM Mice Intoxicated by Microcystin-RR.

Authors:  Wenqing Xiao; Qing Zhong; Feng Sun; Weiguang Wang; Zhiyao Zhao; Kangding Gu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Evaluation of Cyanobacterial Bloom from Lake Taihu as a Protein Substitute in Fish Diet-A Case Study on Tilapia.

Authors:  Yan Huo; Yuanze Li; Wei Guo; Jin Liu; Cuiping Yang; Lin Li; Haokun Liu; Lirong Song
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 4.  Microcystin-Induced Immunotoxicity in Fishes: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Wang Lin; Tien-Chieh Hung; Tomofumi Kurobe; Yi Wang; Pinhong Yang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  A review and assessment of cyanobacterial toxins as cardiovascular health hazards.

Authors:  Zorica Svirčev; Liang Chen; Kinga Sántha; Damjana Drobac Backović; Stamenko Šušak; Aleksandra Vulin; Tamara Palanački Malešević; Geoffrey A Codd; Jussi Meriluoto
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.168

Review 6.  Immobilization of Microbes for Biodegradation of Microcystins: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Jiajia Zhang; Jia Wei; Isaac Yaw Massey; Tangjian Peng; Fei Yang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Impact of Cyanotoxin Ingestion on Liver Cancer Development Using an At-Risk Two-Staged Model of Mouse Hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  Igor Mrdjen; Jiyoung Lee; Christopher M Weghorst; Thomas J Knobloch
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Blood Trace Element Status in Camels: A Review.

Authors:  Mutassim M Abdelrahman; Ibrahim A Alhidary; Riyadh S Aljumaah; Bernard Faye
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  Examination of Microcystin Adsorption by the Type of Plastic Materials Used during the Procedure of Microcystin Analysis.

Authors:  Chan Seo; Joo Won Lee; Won-Kyo Jung; Yoon-Mi Lee; Seungjun Lee; Sang Gil Lee
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Characteristics of Harmful Algal Species in the Coastal Waters of China from 1990 to 2017.

Authors:  Wanli Hou; Xi Chen; Menglin Ba; Jianghua Yu; Tiantian Chen; Yihui Zhu; Jie Bai
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.