| Literature DB >> 36003693 |
Srilakshmi M Adhyapak1, V Rao Parachuri2, Tinku Thomas3, Kiron Varghese1.
Abstract
Objectives: This pilot study evaluates the association of relative wall thickness (RWT) on survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). We hypothesized that patients with preserved RWT may be better candidates for surgical ventricular restoration than those with thinner RWT.Entities:
Keywords: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; E/A ratio, early mitral filling velocity/late filling velocity; ESVI, end systolic volume index; ICM, ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; NT pro-BNP, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; RFP, restrictive filling pattern; RWT, relative wall thickness; STITCH, Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure; SVR, surgical ventricular restoration; TDI, tissue Doppler index; heart failure; left ventricle; relative wall thickness; surgical ventricular restoration
Year: 2021 PMID: 36003693 PMCID: PMC9390468 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JTCVS Open ISSN: 2666-2736
Baseline clinical characteristics of patients
| Clinical characteristic | RWT > 0.34 | RWT < 0.34 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 62 ± 14.2 | 58.8 ± 6.8 | .736 |
| Male | 98 (84) | 20 (42) | .184 |
| Htn | 101 (86) | 19 (40) | <.001 |
| DM | 89 (76) | 23 (48) | .008 |
| AWMI | 45 (38) | 39 (81) | <.001 |
| IWMI | 6 (5) | 1 (2%) | .675 |
| NSTEMI | 52 (44) | 22 (46) | .999 |
| NYHA functional class | 2.98 ± 1.12 | 3.85 ± 2.1 | .0086 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). RWT, Relative wall thickness; Htn, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; AWMI, anterior wall myocardial infarction; IWMI, inferior wall myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival plot of mortality for congestive heart failure. Two lines represent relative wall thickness (RWT) ≥ 0.34 and RWT < 0.34 groups. Shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval. The numbers at risk at the beginning of the follow-up time were n = 106 in RWT ≥ 0.34 group and n = 59 in RWT < 0.34 group. Mortality was 9 and 39 in the 2 groups, respectively. Log-rank test P < .001 for the comparison between the 2 RWT groups.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier plot of readmission during the follow-up period. Two lines represent relative wall thickness (RWT) ≥ 0.34 and RWT < 0.34 groups. Shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval. The numbers at risk at the beginning of the follow-up time were n = 106 in RWT ≥ 0.34 group and n = 59 in RWT < 0.34 group. Readmissions were 31 and 58 in the 2 groups, respectively. Log-rank test P < .001 for the comparison between the 2 RWT groups.
Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic parameters of the 4 groups of ischemic cardiomyopathy patients
| 2D study | RWT ≥ 0.34 | RWT < 0.34 | Intergroups comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVIDd (cms) | 4.96 ± 0.67 | 5.72 ± 0.67 | <.0001 |
| LVIDs (cms) | 3.66 ± 0.72 | 4.40 ± 0.86 | <.0001 |
| LVEF (%) | 38.37 ± 6.03 | 35.27 ± 7.39 | <.0001 |
| PASP (mm Hg) | 35.42 ± 12.80 | 35.22 ± 11.27 | <.0001 |
| LA (cms) | 3.82 ± 0.72 | 3.90 ± 0.53 | .0025 |
| E/A ratio | 0.96 ± 0.41 | 1.01 ± 0.39 | .0005 |
| E/e′ ratio | 11.19 ± 3.80 | 12.13 ± 5.39 | .003 |
| DT (msec) | 152.44 ± 46.15 | 159.02 ± 54.53 | .014 |
| PWDd (cms) | 1.088 ± 0.14 | 0.95 ± 0.18 | <.0001 |
| IVSd (cms) | 1.068 ± 0.20 | 0.92 ± 0.20 | .0002 |
| RWT (cms) | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.089 | <.0001 |
| TAPSE | 1.96 ± 0.298 | 1.89 ± 0.34 | .02 |
RWT, Relative wall thickness; LVIDs, left ventricular diameter in diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular diameter in systole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PASP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure; LA, left atrial; E/A, early mitral filling to late mitral filling velocity; E/e′, TDI e wave velocity; DT, deceleration time; PWDd, posterior wall diameter in diastole; IVSd, interventricular septal diameter in diastole; RFP, restrictive filling pattern; TAPSE, tricuspid annular motion in systole.
Two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters of the 2 groups of ischemic cardiomyopathy patients at follow-up
| Parameter | Group | 6 mo | 12 mo | 18 mo | 24 mo | Time × group interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVIDd (cms) | RWT ≥ 0.34 | 4.96 ± 0.67 | 5.72 ± 0.67 | 5.34 ± 0.6 | 5.37 ± 0.59 | .132 |
| LVIDs (cms) | RWT ≥ 0.34 | 3.66 ± 0.72 | 4.40 ± 0.86 | 3.97 ± 0.69 | 3.97 ± 0.69 | .990 |
| LVEF (%) | RWT ≥ 0.34 | 38.37 ± 6.03 | 35.27 ± 7.39 | 36.1 ± 6.1 | 36.6 ± 6.09 | .836 |
| LA (cms) | RWT ≥ 0.34 | 3.84 ± 0.7 | 4.17 ± 3.4 | 3.87 ± 0.62 | 3.87 ± 0.62 | .921 |
| E/A ratio | RWT ≥ 0.34 | 0.96 ± 0.41 | 1.01 ± 0.39 | 1.19 ± 0.63 | 1.19 ± 0.63 | <.001 |
| RWT (cms) | RWT ≥ 0.34 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.42 ± 0.008 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | .9951 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. LVIDd, Left ventricular diameter in diastole; RWT, relative wall thickness; LVIDs, left ventricular diameter in systole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LA, left atrial; E/A ratio, early mitral filling to late mitral filling velocity.
P value from repeated measures analysis of variance.
Figure 3Estimated average ratio of the early mitral filling velocity/late filling velocity (E/A) and 95% confidence interval at each follow-up time in the relative wall thickness (RWT) ≥ 0.34 and RWT < 0.34 groups.
Figure 4Left ventricular function and survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with preserved relative wall thickness (RWT) had lesser all-cause mortality and readmissions for heart failure.