Literature DB >> 14762345

Why do patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of viable myocardium not always recover in function after revascularization?

Arend F L Schinkel1, Don Poldermans, Vittoria Rizzello, Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde, Abdou Elhendy, Eric Boersma, Jos R T C Roelandt, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium, myocardial revascularization may improve left ventricular ejection fraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate why not all patients with a substantial amount of viable tissue recover in function after revascularization.
METHODS: A total of 118 consecutive patients with a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (on average 29% +/- 6%) due to chronic coronary artery disease underwent myocardial revascularization. Before revascularization all patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography to assess regional dysfunction, left ventricular volumes, and myocardial viability as well as radionuclide ventriculography to determine the left ventricular ejection fraction. Next, 3 to 6 months after revascularization, the left ventricular ejection fraction and regional contractile function were reassessed. Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction > or = 5% following revascularization was considered clinically significant.
RESULTS: Dobutamine stress echocardiography revealed that 489 (37%) of the 1329 dysfunctional segments were viable. A total of 61 (52%) patients had a substantial amount of viable myocardium (> or = 4 viable segments). In these 61 patients the global function was expected to recover > or = 5% after revascularization. However, left ventricular ejection fraction did not improve in 20 (33%) of 61 patients despite the presence of substantial viability. Clinical characteristics and echocardiographic data were comparable between patients with and without improvement. However, patients without improvement had considerably larger end systolic volumes (153 +/- 41 mL vs 133 +/- 46 mL, P =.007). The likelihood of recovery of global function decreased proportionally with the increase of end systolic volume (P <.001, R = 0.43, n = 61). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that an end systolic volume > or = 140 mL had the highest sensitivity/specificity to predict the absence of global recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy not only the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium but also the extent of left ventricular remodeling determines the improvement in function following myocardial revascularization. Patients with a high end systolic volume due to left ventricular remodeling have a decreased likelihood of improvement of global function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14762345     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of long-term reverse left ventricular remodeling after revascularization or medical treatment in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: a comparative study between SPECT and MRI.

Authors:  Tomas Skala; Martin Hutyra; Jan Vaclavik; Milan Kaminek; David Horak; Josef Novotny; Jana Zapletalova; Jan Lukl; Dan Marek; Milos Taborsky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Clinical assessment of myocardial hibernation.

Authors:  Arend F L Schinkel; Jeroen J Bax; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Improvement of stress LVEF rather than rest LVEF after coronary revascularisation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium.

Authors:  V Rizzello; D Poldermans; E Biagini; A F L Schinkel; R van Domburg; A Elhendy; E C Vourvouri; M Bountioukos; A Lombardo; B Krenning; J R T C Roelandt; J J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes and function by cine-MR imaging depending on the investigator's experience.

Authors:  A Bailly; J Lipiecki; P Chabrot; A Alfidja; J M Garcier; S Ughetto; J Ponsonnaille; L Boyer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Benjamin Cheong; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  The benefits of revascularization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Sothinathan Gurunathan; Asrar Ahmed; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  Aesthetic cardiology: adipose-derived stem cells for myocardial repair.

Authors:  Nathan J Palpant; Joseph M Metzger
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Severity of Remodeling, Myocardial Viability, and Survival in Ischemic LV Dysfunction After Surgical Revascularization.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Serenella Castelvecchio; Julio A Panza; Daniel S Berman; Eric J Velazquez; Robert E Michler; Lilin She; Thomas A Holly; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Dragana Kosevic; Miroslaw Rajda; Lukasz Chrzanowski; Marek Deja; Kerry L Lee; Harvey White; Jae K Oh; Torsten Doenst; James A Hill; Jean L Rouleau; Lorenzo Menicanti
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 9.  Role of cardiac surgery in the post-myocardial infarction patient with heart failure.

Authors:  Marzia Leacche; Jorge M Balaguer; John G Byrne
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-12

10.  [Diagnostics and therapy of ischemia in chronic stable angina pectoris. Role of echocardiography].

Authors:  R S von Bardeleben; K Tiemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.