Literature DB >> 20060737

Predictors of adverse events after surgical ventricular restoration for advanced ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Marco Pocar1, Alessandra Di Mauro, Davide Passolunghi, Andrea Moneta, Al Megalli Tantawi Ali Alsheraei, Alda Bregasi, Roberto Mattioli, Francesco Donatelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Post-infarction ventricular remodelling has been graded (I-III) according to the loss of systolic left ventricular silhouette curvature changes. Although surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) has been extended to type III ischaemic cardiomyopathy, the results are less satisfactory. We sought to identify geometric and functional predictors of late outcome after SVR.
METHODS: Among 144 patients who underwent SVR since 1998, a subgroup of 31 patients (age: 65.2+/-7.6 years) was analysed. Inclusion criteria were: type III cardiomyopathy, no associated procedure except coronary artery bypass grafting, prior anterior infarction, absent-to-2+ mitral regurgitation, elective operation, follow-up > or =18 months (mean: 44+/-26; longest: 96 months). Probability of events was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox multivariable regression model was constructed selecting eight potential predictors of four adverse events: death, cardiac death, recurrent heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) and left ventricular re-remodelling, defined as a 25% increase of end-systolic volume index after SVR, or an end-systolic volume index > or =50 ml.m(-2).
RESULTS: Early and late mortality were zero and 6% (2/31 patients, one cardiac-related death). NYHA class and all echocardiographic functional variables significantly improved early after SVR. Freedom (+/-standard error (SE)) from heart failure was 97%+/-3%, 93%+/-5%, 77%+/-11% and 64%+/-15%, whereas freedom from left ventricular re-remodelling was 97%+/-3%, 80%+/-8%, 60%+/-12% and 39%+/-15%, respectively, 1, 3, 5 and 7 years after SVR. Multivariable analysis identified baseline mitral regurgitation degree and sphericity index as independent predictors of recurrent heart failure (p=0.025; hazard ratio (HR)=7.80 (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.29-47.19)) and left ventricular re-remodelling (p=0.047; HR=2.84 (95% CIs: 1.01-7.95)). Both predictors also correlated with a higher recurrence of end-systolic volume index > or =50 ml.m(-2) at late follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite advanced cardiomyopathy, SVR determines left ventricular volume reduction and improved systolic function. Baseline absent-to-moderate mitral regurgitation and a more spherical left ventricular geometry predict a less favourable clinical and functional outcome, suggesting a possible rationale for wider indications for combined correction of 2+ mitral regurgitation and undersizing of the mitral annulus, particularly in patients with sphericity index > or =0.75. Copyright 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20060737     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is programmed electrical stimulation mandatory for recognition of ventricular arrhythmogenicity in heart failure?

Authors:  Srilakshmi Mandayam Adhyapak; Venkateswara Rao Parachuri
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-19

Review 2.  Surgical ventricular restoration for the treatment of heart failure.

Authors:  Gerald Buckberg; Constantine Athanasuleas; John Conte
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Impact of surgical ventricular reconstruction on sphericity index in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: follow-up from the STICH trial.

Authors:  Jin-Oh Choi; Richard C Daly; Grace Lin; Brian D Lahr; Heather J Wiste; Thomas M Beaver; Attilio Iacovoni; Marcin Malinowski; Ivar Friedrich; Jean L Rouleau; Roberto R Favaloro; George Sopko; Irene M Lang; Harvey D White; Carmelo A Milano; Robert H Jones; Kerry L Lee; Eric J Velazquez; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 15.534

4.  Restoration of optimal ellipsoid left ventricular geometry: lessons learnt from in silico surgical modelling.

Authors:  Srilakshmi M Adhyapak; Prahlad G Menon; V Rao Parachuri
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-14

Review 5.  Surgical ventricular restoration-meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Srilakshmi Mandayam Adhyapak; Prahlad Gopalakrishna Menon; Venkateswara Rao Parachuri; John Michael; Tinku Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-09

6.  Predictive Value of Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Surgical Ventricular Restoration.

Authors:  Olena Nemchyna; Natalia Solowjowa; Michael Dandel; Yuriy Hrytsyna; Julia Stein; Jan Knierim; Felix Schoenrath; Felix Hennig; Volkmar Falk; Christoph Knosalla
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-21

7.  Left ventricular function and survival in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Implications for surgical ventricular restoration.

Authors:  Srilakshmi M Adhyapak; V Rao Parachuri; Tinku Thomas; Kiron Varghese
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.