| Literature DB >> 36003284 |
Shengjun Qian1,2, Zhan Wang1,2, Ying Ren1, Ian Chew3, Guangyao Jiang2, Wanli Li1,2, Weishan Chen1,2.
Abstract
Objective: After laminoplasty, the cervical sagittal curvature of some patients tend to be lordotic, this phenomenon cannot be explained by the theory of laminoplasty, and the reason remains unknown. We explored the possible role played by pinching cervical spondylotic myelopathy (PCSM) in the cervical sagittal curvature change in patients after laminoplasty.Entities:
Keywords: PCSM; kyphosis; laminoplasty; ligamentum flavum; lordosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36003284 PMCID: PMC9393385 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.906839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1Flowchart of the collection of the study population.
Clinical summary of 122 patients with CSM.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male, | 37 (74.00) | 58 (80.56) | 0.391 |
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 58.82 (7.91) | 59.24 (8.47) | 0.261 |
| BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD) | 27.34 (4.11) | 26.91 (3.94) | 0.561 |
| Diabetes, | 6 (12.00) | 9 (12.50) | 0.934 |
| Hypertension, | 23 (46.00) | 37 (51.39) | 0.558 |
| Stenotic segments | |||
| 3 segments, | 28 (56.00) | 37 (51.39) | 0.616 |
| 4–5 segments, | 22 (44.00) | 35 (48.61) | 0.616 |
| Intraoperative bleeding, ml, mean (SD) | 211.34 (108.76) | 232.89 (122.63) | 0.320 |
| Surgical time, min, mean (SD) | 102.62 (36.42) | 109.13 (30.92) | 0.290 |
| Follow-up time, mon, mean (SD) | 27.32 (3.55) | 26.97 (3.45) | 0.587 |
CSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathy; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2The schematic of Group A, Group B, CGA, ROM and thickness of ligamentum flavum. (A) Group A, anterior compression only, without PCSM. (B) Group B, both anterior and posterior compression, with PCSM. (C) The CGA is measured between the posterior border of the C2 and C7 vertebral body on neutral lateral radiograph. (D,E) The C2-7 ROM is calculated as the difference between the CGA measured during the maximal extension and flexion on the dynamic lateral radiographs. (F) The thickness of ligamentum flavum was measured as the length of (a,b) at the site where the spinal cord was most seriously compressed according to sagittal MR (a was the distance of the anterior border and the posterior border of the spinal canal, b was the distance of the anterior border of the spinal canal and the posterior border of the spinal cord).
Comparison of VAS, mJOA and the mJOA recovery rates between Group A and Group B.
| Group A | Group B | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Op VAS | 5.62 ± 1.76 | 5.57 ± 1.75 | 0.876 |
| Post-Op VAS | 3.18 ± 2.01 | 2.54 ± 1.46 | 0.058 |
| VAS change | −2.44 ± 1.15 | −3.03 ± 1.26 | 0.010 |
| Pre-Op mJOA | 9.06 ± 2.40 | 9.32 ± 2.44 | 0.562 |
| Post-Op mJOA | 12.92 ± 2.69 | 14.01 ± 2.08 | 0.013 |
| mJOA change | 3.86 ± 1.55 | 4.69 ± 1.94 | 0.013 |
| mJOA recovery rate | 0.52 ± 0.21 | 0.63 ± 0.19 | 0.005 |
VAS change = Post-Op VAS – Pre-Op VAS, mJOA change = Post-Op mJOA – Pre-Op mJOA. mJOA recovery rate (%) = (Post-Op mJOA−Pre-Op mJOA) / (17−Pre-Op mJOA) × 100%. Values are displayed as a mean ± standard deviation. Significance between the two groups, P < 0.05. VAS,visual analogue scale; mJOA, modified japanese orthopedic association.
Comparison of CGAs, ROMs and ligamentum flavum thicknesses between Group A and Group B.
| Group A | Group B | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Op CGA (°) | 19.52 ± 9.58 | 17.49 ± 9.16 | 0.240 |
| Post-Op CGA (°) | 13.62 ± 9.74 | 20.34 ± 8.35 | <0.001 |
| CGA change (°) | −5.89 ± 4.22 | 2.85 ± 6.24 | <0.001 |
| Pre-Op ROM (°) | 45.68 ± 8.69 | 39.56 ± 8.86 | <0.001 |
| Post-Op ROM (°) | 37.74 ± 8.01 | 41.34 ± 8.81 | 0.023 |
| ROM change (°) | −7.94 ± 3.15 | 1.78 ± 6.32 | <0.001 |
| Thickness of LF (mm) | 1.98 ± 0.43 | 3.42 ± 0.69 | <0.001 |
CGA change = Post-Op CGA – Pre-Op CGA, ROM change = Post-Op ROM – Pre-Op ROM. Values are displayed as a mean ± standard deviation. Significance between the two groups, P < 0.05. CGA, cervical global angle; ROM, range of cervical motion.
Postoperative complication between Group A and Group B.
| Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|
| Incision infection, | 2 (4.00) | 3 (4.17) |
| Hematoma, | 1 (2.00) | 2 (2.78) |
| Cerebrospinal fluid leakage, | 1 (2.00) | 1 (1.39) |
| Spinal cord injury, | 1 (2.00) | 2 (2.78) |
| Persistent axial pain, | 6 (12.00) | 8 (11.11) |
| C5 paresis, | 3 (6.00) | 3 (4.17) |
| Postoperative thrombosis, | 1 (2.00) | 2 (2.78) |
Figure 3Radiological presentation of a 59 year-old man from Group A (A–C) and a 56 year-old man from Group B (D–F). (A) Preoperative lateral X-ray showed the CGA was 25.8°. (B) MR revealed the spinal cord had anterior compression only. (C) Postoperative lateral X-ray showed the CGA was 18.6°. (D) Preoperative lateral X-ray showed the CGA was 22.3°. (E) MR revealed spinal cord had both anterior and posterior compression. (F) Postoperative lateral X-ray showed the CGA was 31.8°.