Literature DB >> 10078127

Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament.

K Hirabayashi1, Y Toyama, K Chiba.   

Abstract

Laminectomy, which had long been used for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, including ossification of the longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine, had numerous complications such as postoperative malalignment of the cervical spine and vulnerability of the spinal cord caused by total removal of the posterior structures. In 1977 Hirabayashi devised an open door expansive laminoplasty, which is a relatively easier and safer procedure than laminectomy, that eliminated such problems by preserving the posterior elements. The decompression effect of the expansive laminoplasty against a compressed spinal cord is comparable with that of laminectomy and anterior decompression followed by fusion, whereas the expansive laminoplasty has no structural problems and adverse effects on adjacent disc levels that often are associated with anterior decompression followed by fusion. Average recovery rate of expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy has been reported to be approximately 60% (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score) and with long term stability. At present, authors consider all patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy candidates for expansive laminoplasty except for those having preoperative kyphosis and single level lesion without canal stenosis. Two remaining problems of expansive laminoplasty to be solved are prevention of C5,C6 radicular pain and/or paresis, the most frequent complication that occurs in approximately 5% to 10% of the patients, although most complications resolve spontaneously within 2 years, and correction of nonlordotic alignment to lordosis which are essential for posterior decompression effect of expansive laminoplasty by allowing the spinal cord to shift dorsally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10078127     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199902000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  33 in total

1.  Predicted cervical canal enlargement and effective cord decompression following expansive laminoplasty using cervical magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohd Imran Yusof; Eskandar Hassan; Shafie Abdullah
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  French door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Sébastien Schuller; Gergi Sfeir; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate-screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod-screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Rudolf Andreas Kristof; Thomas Kiefer; Marcus Thudium; Florian Ringel; Michael Stoffel; Attlila Kovacs; Christian-Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The morphological and clinical significance of developmental cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Miao Yu; Yanchao Tang; Zhongjun Liu; Yu Sun; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of correlative risk factors for C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Haiying Wang; Xu Zhang; Bing Lv; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Dalong Yang; Zhilong Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

7.  Impact of deep extensor muscle-preserving approach on clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Ken Nagahama; Akira Iwata; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Eijiro Okada; Morio Matsumoto; Daisuke Ichihara; Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Hirokazu Fujiwara; Suketaka Momoshima; Yuji Nishiwaki; Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Ogawa; Masahiko Watanabe; Takeshi Takahata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep extensor muscle-preserving approach: impact on cervical spine function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Shigeki Ohshima; Yoshihiro Hojo; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Preliminary Experiences of the Combined Midline-Splitting French Door Laminoplasty with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Plate for Cervical Spondylosis and OPLL.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Oh; Gyu Yeul Ji; Junseok W Hur; Won-Seok Choi; Dong Ah Shin; Jang-Bo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2015-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.