Literature DB >> 23631946

The economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders among the United States population younger than 40 years.

John S Wittenborn1, Xinzhi Zhang, Charles W Feagan, Wesley L Crouse, Sundar Shrestha, Alex R Kemper, Thomas J Hoerger, Jinan B Saaddine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders in the United States population younger than 40 years in 2012.
DESIGN: Econometric and statistical analysis of survey, commercial claims, and census data. PARTICIPANTS: The United States population younger than 40 years in 2012.
METHODS: We categorized costs based on consensus guidelines. We estimated medical costs attributable to diagnosed eye-related disorders, undiagnosed vision loss, and medical vision aids using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and MarketScan data. The prevalence of vision impairment and blindness were estimated using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. We estimated costs from lost productivity using Survey of Income and Program Participation. We estimated costs of informal care, low vision aids, special education, school screening, government spending, and transfer payments based on published estimates and federal budgets. We estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost based on published utility values. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs and QALYs lost in 2012.
RESULTS: The economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders among the United States population younger than 40 years was $27.5 billion in 2012 (95% confidence interval, $21.5-$37.2 billion), including $5.9 billion for children and $21.6 billion for adults 18 to 39 years of age. Direct costs were $14.5 billion, including $7.3 billion in medical costs for diagnosed disorders, $4.9 billion in refraction correction, $0.5 billion in medical costs for undiagnosed vision loss, and $1.8 billion in other direct costs. Indirect costs were $13 billion, primarily because of $12.2 billion in productivity losses. In addition, vision loss cost society 215 000 QALYs.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial burden resulting from vision loss and eye disorders in the United States population younger than 40 years, a population excluded from previous studies. Monetizing quality-of-life losses at $50 000 per QALY would add $10.8 billion in additional costs, indicating a total economic burden of $38.2 billion. Relative to previously reported estimates for the population 40 years of age and older, more than one third of the total cost of vision loss and eye disorders may be incurred by persons younger than 40 years. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23631946      PMCID: PMC5304763          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?

Authors:  W G Manning; J Mullahy
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Allen Foster
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Use of econometric models to estimate expenditure shares.

Authors:  Justin G Trogdon; Eric A Finkelstein; Thomas J Hoerger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Association between vision loss and higher medical care costs in Medicare beneficiaries costs are greater for those with progressive vision loss.

Authors:  Jonathan C Javitt; Zhiyuan Zhou; Richard J Willke
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The cost of visual impairment: purposes, perspectives, and guidance.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Steven M Kymes; Paul P Lee; David B Matchar; M Lynne Pezzullo; David B Rein; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Prevalence and correlates of children's diagnosed eye and vision conditions.

Authors:  Michael L Ganz; Ziming Xuan; David G Hunter
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States.

Authors:  David B Rein; Ping Zhang; Kathleen E Wirth; Paul P Lee; Thomas J Hoerger; Nancy McCall; Ronald Klein; James M Tielsch; Sandeep Vijan; Jinan Saaddine
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12

8.  The economic costs and benefits of dog guides for the blind.

Authors:  Kathleen E Wirth; David B Rein
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.648

9.  Evaluation of non-medical costs associated with visual impairment in four European countries: France, Italy, Germany and the UK.

Authors:  Antoine Lafuma; Antoine Brézin; Stefania Lopatriello; Klaus Hieke; Julia Hutchinson; Viviane Mimaud; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values.

Authors:  M R Gold; P Franks; K I McCoy; D G Fryback
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  43 in total

1.  Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes.

Authors:  Mitch Brinks; Tosha Zaback; Dong-Wouk Park; Randall Joan; Stephanie K Cramer; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Cogent Med       Date:  2018-12-18

2.  Self-reported Vision Impairment and Subjective Well-being in Older Adults: A Longitudinal Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoling Xiang; Vicki A Freedman; Khushali Shah; Rita X Hu; Brian C Stagg; Joshua R Ehrlich
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Prevalence of asymptomatic ocular conditions in subjects with refractive-based symptoms.

Authors:  Langis Michaud; Pierre Forcier
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-09-20

4.  Attitudes toward postmortem cornea donation in Germany: a multicenter survey.

Authors:  C E Uhlig; R Koch; J Promesberger; G Hirschfeld; H Schmidt; B Seitz; T Reinhard; D Böhringer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Cost-effectiveness of Autonomous Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Screening for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes.

Authors:  Risa M Wolf; Roomasa Channa; Michael D Abramoff; Harold P Lehmann
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  CHOROIDEREMIA: Retinal Degeneration With an Unmet Need.

Authors:  Mark E Pennesi; David G Birch; Jacque L Duncan; Jean Bennett; Aniz Girach
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy following supine craniotomy for epidural abscess in a child.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Oliver; Andrew J Kobets; Brendan F Judy; Alan R Cohen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Refractive surgery: the most cost-saving technique in refractive errors correction.

Authors:  Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi; Cyrus Alinia; Maryam Tavakkoli; Alireza Lashay; Hormoz Chams
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Trends in Visual Health Inequalities in Childhood Through Associations of Visual Function With Sex and Social Position Across 3 UK Birth Cohorts.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bountziouka; Phillippa M Cumberland; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  Barriers to eye care among participants of a mobile eye clinic.

Authors:  Kousanee Chheda; Rong Wu; Tosha Zaback; Mitchell V Brinks
Journal:  Cogent Med       Date:  2019-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.