Literature DB >> 35994662

The generality of cryptic dietary niche differences in diverse large-herbivore assemblages.

Johan Pansu1,2, Matthew C Hutchinson1, T Michael Anderson3, Mariska Te Beest4,5, Colleen M Begg6, Keith S Begg6, Aurelie Bonin7,8, Lackson Chama9, Simon Chamaillé-Jammes10,11, Eric Coissac7, Joris P G M Cromsigt4,5,12, Margaret Y Demmel1, Jason E Donaldson3,13, Jennifer A Guyton1, Christina B Hansen1, Christopher I Imakando9, Azwad Iqbal1, Davis F Kalima14, Graham I H Kerley5, Samson Kurukura15, Marietjie Landman5, Ryan A Long16, Isaack Norbert Munuo17, Ciara M Nutter1, Catherine L Parr18,19,20, Arjun B Potter1, Stanford Siachoono9, Pierre Taberlet7,21, Eusebio Waiti6, Tyler R Kartzinel22,23, Robert M Pringle1.   

Abstract

Ecological niche differences are necessary for stable species coexistence but are often difficult to discern. Models of dietary niche differentiation in large mammalian herbivores invoke the quality, quantity, and spatiotemporal distribution of plant tissues and growth forms but are agnostic toward food plant species identity. Empirical support for these models is variable, suggesting that additional mechanisms of resource partitioning may be important in sustaining large-herbivore diversity in African savannas. We used DNA metabarcoding to conduct a taxonomically explicit analysis of large-herbivore diets across southeastern Africa, analyzing ∼4,000 fecal samples of 30 species from 10 sites in seven countries over 6 y. We detected 893 food plant taxa from 124 families, but just two families-grasses and legumes-accounted for the majority of herbivore diets. Nonetheless, herbivore species almost invariably partitioned food plant taxa; diet composition differed significantly in 97% of pairwise comparisons between sympatric species, and dissimilarity was pronounced even between the strictest grazers (grass eaters), strictest browsers (nongrass eaters), and closest relatives at each site. Niche differentiation was weakest in an ecosystem recovering from catastrophic defaunation, indicating that food plant partitioning is driven by species interactions, and was stronger at low rainfall, as expected if interspecific competition is a predominant driver. Diets differed more between browsers than grazers, which predictably shaped community organization: Grazer-dominated trophic networks had higher nestedness and lower modularity. That dietary differentiation is structured along taxonomic lines complements prior work on how herbivores partition plant parts and patches and suggests that common mechanisms govern herbivore coexistence and community assembly in savannas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community assembly; dietary niche partitioning; ecological network analysis; modern coexistence theory; ungulate foraging behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35994662      PMCID: PMC9436339          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204400119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  56 in total

1.  Resource partitioning among savanna grazers mediated by local heterogeneity: an experimental approach.

Authors:  Joris P G M Cromsigt; Han Olff
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Grassland-herbivore interactions: how do grazers coexist?

Authors:  K D Farnsworth; S Focardi; J A Beecham
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores.

Authors:  Tyler R Kartzinel; Patricia A Chen; Tyler C Coverdale; David L Erickson; W John Kress; Maria L Kuzmina; Daniel I Rubenstein; Wei Wang; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores.

Authors:  Matthew L Forister; Vojtech Novotny; Anna K Panorska; Leontine Baje; Yves Basset; Philip T Butterill; Lukas Cizek; Phyllis D Coley; Francesca Dem; Ivone R Diniz; Pavel Drozd; Mark Fox; Andrea E Glassmire; Rebecca Hazen; Jan Hrcek; Joshua P Jahner; Ondrej Kaman; Tomasz J Kozubowski; Thomas A Kursar; Owen T Lewis; John Lill; Robert J Marquis; Scott E Miller; Helena C Morais; Masashi Murakami; Herbert Nickel; Nicholas A Pardikes; Robert E Ricklefs; Michael S Singer; Angela M Smilanich; John O Stireman; Santiago Villamarín-Cortez; Stepan Vodka; Martin Volf; David L Wagner; Thomas Walla; George D Weiblen; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals.

Authors:  Brett R Jesmer; Jerod A Merkle; Jacob R Goheen; Ellen O Aikens; Jeffrey L Beck; Alyson B Courtemanch; Mark A Hurley; Douglas E McWhirter; Hollie M Miyasaki; Kevin L Monteith; Matthew J Kauffman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Assessing the Jarman-Bell Principle: Scaling of intake, digestibility, retention time and gut fill with body mass in mammalian herbivores.

Authors:  Dennis W H Müller; Daryl Codron; Carlo Meloro; Adam Munn; Angela Schwarm; Jürgen Hummel; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.320

7.  Trophic rewilding revives biotic resistance to shrub invasion.

Authors:  Jennifer A Guyton; Johan Pansu; Matthew C Hutchinson; Tyler R Kartzinel; Arjun B Potter; Tyler C Coverdale; Joshua H Daskin; Ana Gledis da Conceição; Mike J S Peel; Marc E Stalmans; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  Fifty thousand years of Arctic vegetation and megafaunal diet.

Authors:  Eske Willerslev; John Davison; Mari Moora; Martin Zobel; Eric Coissac; Mary E Edwards; Eline D Lorenzen; Mette Vestergård; Galina Gussarova; James Haile; Joseph Craine; Ludovic Gielly; Sanne Boessenkool; Laura S Epp; Peter B Pearman; Rachid Cheddadi; David Murray; Kari Anne Bråthen; Nigel Yoccoz; Heather Binney; Corinne Cruaud; Patrick Wincker; Tomasz Goslar; Inger Greve Alsos; Eva Bellemain; Anne Krag Brysting; Reidar Elven; Jørn Henrik Sønstebø; Julian Murton; Andrei Sher; Morten Rasmussen; Regin Rønn; Tobias Mourier; Alan Cooper; Jeremy Austin; Per Möller; Duane Froese; Grant Zazula; François Pompanon; Delphine Rioux; Vincent Niderkorn; Alexei Tikhonov; Grigoriy Savvinov; Richard G Roberts; Ross D E MacPhee; M Thomas P Gilbert; Kurt H Kjær; Ludovic Orlando; Christian Brochmann; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Predator-induced collapse of niche structure and species coexistence.

Authors:  Robert M Pringle; Tyler R Kartzinel; Todd M Palmer; Naomi A Man In 't Veld; Timothy J Thurman; Kena Fox-Dobbs; Charles C Y Xu; Matthew C Hutchinson; Tyler C Coverdale; Joshua H Daskin; Dominic A Evangelista; Kiyoko M Gotanda; Johanna E Wegener; Jason J Kolbe; Thomas W Schoener; David A Spiller; Jonathan B Losos; Rowan D H Barrett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding.

Authors:  Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; François Pompanon; Ludovic Gielly; Christian Miquel; Alice Valentini; Thierry Vermat; Gérard Corthier; Christian Brochmann; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  The generality of cryptic dietary niche differences in diverse large-herbivore assemblages.

Authors:  Johan Pansu; Matthew C Hutchinson; T Michael Anderson; Mariska Te Beest; Colleen M Begg; Keith S Begg; Aurelie Bonin; Lackson Chama; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; Eric Coissac; Joris P G M Cromsigt; Margaret Y Demmel; Jason E Donaldson; Jennifer A Guyton; Christina B Hansen; Christopher I Imakando; Azwad Iqbal; Davis F Kalima; Graham I H Kerley; Samson Kurukura; Marietjie Landman; Ryan A Long; Isaack Norbert Munuo; Ciara M Nutter; Catherine L Parr; Arjun B Potter; Stanford Siachoono; Pierre Taberlet; Eusebio Waiti; Tyler R Kartzinel; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Picky eating as a means for coexistence.

Authors:  M Dickie; R Serrouya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 12.779

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.