Literature DB >> 18707399

Grassland-herbivore interactions: how do grazers coexist?

K D Farnsworth1, S Focardi, J A Beecham.   

Abstract

We develop a new approach to modeling grazing systems that links foraging characteristics (intake and digestive constraints) with resource dynamics via the probability of encounter with different grass heights. Three complementary models are presented: the generation of a grass height structure through selective grazing; investigating the conditions for consumer coexistence; and, using a simplified resource structure, the consequences for consumer abundance. The main finding is that coexistence between grazers differing in body size is possible if a single-resource type becomes differentiated in its height structure. Large grazers can facilitate food availability for smaller species but with the latter being competitively dominant. The relative preference given to different resource partitions is important in determining the nature of population interactions. Large-body and small-body grazer populations can interact through competitive, parasitic, commensalist, or amensalist relationships, depending on the way they partition the resource as well as their relative populations and the dynamics of resource renewal. The models provide new concepts of multispecies carrying capacity (stock equilibrium) in grazed systems with implications for conservation and management. We conclude that consumer species are not substitutable; therefore, the use of rangeland management concepts such as "livestock units" may be inappropriate.

Year:  2002        PMID: 18707399     DOI: 10.1086/324114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  Gregariousness increases brain size in ungulates.

Authors:  F Javier Pérez-Barbería; Iain J Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores.

Authors:  Tyler R Kartzinel; Patricia A Chen; Tyler C Coverdale; David L Erickson; W John Kress; Maria L Kuzmina; Daniel I Rubenstein; Wei Wang; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The generality of cryptic dietary niche differences in diverse large-herbivore assemblages.

Authors:  Johan Pansu; Matthew C Hutchinson; T Michael Anderson; Mariska Te Beest; Colleen M Begg; Keith S Begg; Aurelie Bonin; Lackson Chama; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; Eric Coissac; Joris P G M Cromsigt; Margaret Y Demmel; Jason E Donaldson; Jennifer A Guyton; Christina B Hansen; Christopher I Imakando; Azwad Iqbal; Davis F Kalima; Graham I H Kerley; Samson Kurukura; Marietjie Landman; Ryan A Long; Isaack Norbert Munuo; Ciara M Nutter; Catherine L Parr; Arjun B Potter; Stanford Siachoono; Pierre Taberlet; Eusebio Waiti; Tyler R Kartzinel; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Individual-area relationship best explains goose species density in wetlands.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Qiang Jia; Herbert H T Prins; Lei Cao; Willem Fred de Boer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Inferring symmetric and asymmetric interactions between animals and groups from positional data.

Authors:  Edward Hollingdale; Francisco Javier Pérez-Barbería; David McPetrie Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  State-Space Modelling of the Drivers of Movement Behaviour in Sympatric Species.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; M Small; R J Hooper; A Aldezabal; R Soriguer-Escofet; G S Bakken; I J Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Grassland structural heterogeneity in a savanna is driven more by productivity differences than by consumption differences between lawn and bunch grasses.

Authors:  Michiel P Veldhuis; Heleen F Fakkert; Matty P Berg; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Resource partitioning between ungulate populations in arid environments.

Authors:  Robert S C Cooke; Tim Woodfine; Marie Petretto; Thomas H G Ezard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.