Literature DB >> 35992503

Development of a Standard Push-up Scale for College-Aged Females.

Melanie M Adams1, Sophie A Hatch1, Elizabeth G Winsor1, Caitlyn Parmelee2.   

Abstract

The ACSM/CESP push-up test exemplifies the limiting nature of the gender binary in fitness. Males perform the standard push-up (from toes) while females perform the modified push-up (from knees), even if capable of multiple standard push-ups. Differences in upper body strength are used to justify the test protocol. Though the load difference between modified and standard positions is substantially less than the gender strength gap. Additionally, current fitness ratings are over 30 years old. The purpose of this study was to develop a new standard push-up rating scale for college-age females. Cis-female college students (n = 72) were recruited to perform maximal repetitions in the modified and standard positions. Health history and physical activity information was gathered prior to the test. Trained research assistants provided standardized warm-up, modelled correct form, and administered the tests. Order of the tests was randomized and there was at least 48 hours between test days. Mean push-ups in the standard position was 9 (8.87) and 17.5 (11.76) in the modified position. Participants who resistance train did significantly more repetitions of each. Linear regression was used to develop an equation to predict standard push-up repetitions from modified repetitions. The equation was applied to the current repetition ranges for each fitness category, and a new standard scale was developed. The new scale ratings are similar to the Revised Push-up but lower than the Fitnessgram® Healthy Zone. The modified or "girl" push-up contributes to gender stereotypes about muscular fitness. Providing females with the option to be graded on the standard push-up is a step to reducing gender bias in fitness. Future research is needed to validate this scale.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Push-up test; fitness testing; gender; stereotype

Year:  2022        PMID: 35992503      PMCID: PMC9362895     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  10 in total

1.  Dynamic and electromyographical analysis in variants of push-up exercise.

Authors:  Marina K Gouvali; Konstantinos Boudolos
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The effect of position on the percentage of body mass supported during traditional and modified push-up variants.

Authors:  David N Suprak; Jay Dawes; Mark D Stephenson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Upper body push and pull strength ratio in recreationally active adults.

Authors:  Rodney J Negrete; William J Hanney; Patrick Pabian; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04

4.  Differences in elbow extensor muscle characteristics between resistance-trained men and women.

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Jason B White; Y Eliot Hu; Jason D Stone; Jonathan M Oliver; Margaret T Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Kinetic analysis of several variations of push-ups.

Authors:  William P Ebben; Bradley Wurm; Tyler L VanderZanden; Mark L Spadavecchia; John J Durocher; Curtis T Bickham; Erich J Petushek
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Validity of field tests of upper body muscular strength.

Authors:  R R Pate; M L Burgess; J A Woods; J G Ross; T Baumgartner
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics.

Authors:  A E Miller; J D MacDougall; M A Tarnopolsky; D G Sale
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

8.  Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women.

Authors:  P Bishop; K Cureton; M Collins
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Inter-Rater Reliability and Intra-Rater Reliability of Assessing the 2-Minute Push-Up Test.

Authors:  Lynn Fielitz; Jeffrey Coelho; Thomas Horne; William Brechue
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  A Comparison between Male and Female Athletes in Relative Strength and Power Performances.

Authors:  Sandro Bartolomei; Giuseppe Grillone; Rocco Di Michele; Matteo Cortesi
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2021-02-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.