Literature DB >> 20179649

The effect of position on the percentage of body mass supported during traditional and modified push-up variants.

David N Suprak1, Jay Dawes, Mark D Stephenson.   

Abstract

The push-up is a popular upper-extremity weight-bearing exercise. However, limited information is available regarding its effectiveness. Much of the past research has focused on muscle activation levels, whereas very little has examined the forces encountered during push-up variants. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of position within the range of motion on the percentage of body mass (BM) supported by the upper extremities during the traditional and modified (knees-down) push-up. Twenty-eight highly strength-trained male subjects were positioned with their hands on a force platform in 4 static positions, consisting of the up and down position in both the traditional and modified push-up exercise. The performance measures included the average vertical ground reaction force (GRF), expressed as a percentage of BM, supported in each of the 4 static positions and the percentage of change between the up and down positions in each push-up exercise. In both the traditional and modified push-ups, subjects supported less weight in the up vs. the down position. The percentage change in % BM from the up to the down position was greater in the modified push-up variant. The pattern of resistances to the push-up exercises observed in this study may be a result of differing moment arms between the support surface contact point (knees or feet) and the hands. These results may be useful in prescribing programs for strengthening and/or rehabilitation for both the prime movers and stabilizers of the upper extremity. Further, range of motion may need to be altered to accommodate strength differences in beginners and clients rehabilitating from injury.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20179649     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bde2cf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  11 in total

1.  Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance.

Authors:  Richard B Westrick; Joseph M Miller; Scott D Carow; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

2.  PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND INJURY PREVENTION STRATEGIES FOR THE ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST: TECHNIQUE MATTERS.

Authors:  Mark Thelen; Shane Koppenhaver
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

3.  What Factors Predict Upper Body Push to Pull Ratios in Professional Firefighters?

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Adam A Burke; Marcie B Fyock-Martin; Joel R Martin
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

4.  The Effect of Short-Term Sport-Specific Strength and Conditioning Training on Physical Fitness of Well-Trained Mixed Martial Arts Athletes.

Authors:  Ioannis N Kostikiadis; Spyridon Methenitis; Athanasios Tsoukos; Panagiotis Veligekas; Gerasimos Terzis; Gregory C Bogdanis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Mind-muscle connection training principle: influence of muscle strength and training experience during a pushing movement.

Authors:  Joaquin Calatayud; Jonas Vinstrup; Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Juan Carlos Colado; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Selective Activation of Shoulder, Trunk, and Arm Muscles: A Comparative Analysis of Different Push-Up Variants.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marcolin; Nicola Petrone; Tatiana Moro; Giuseppe Battaglia; Antonino Bianco; Antonio Paoli
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The Effects of Multiple-Joint Isokinetic Resistance Training on Maximal Isokinetic and Dynamic Muscle Strength and Local Muscular Endurance.

Authors:  Nicholas A Ratamess; Noah A Beller; Adam M Gonzalez; Gregory E Spatz; Jay R Hoffman; Ryan E Ross; Avery D Faigenbaum; Jie Kang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Scapular kinematics and shoulder elevation in a traditional push-up.

Authors:  David N Suprak; Jennifer Bohannon; Gabriel Morales; Joseph Stroschein; Jun G San Juan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Development of a Standard Push-up Scale for College-Aged Females.

Authors:  Melanie M Adams; Sophie A Hatch; Elizabeth G Winsor; Caitlyn Parmelee
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-06-01

10.  The effects of exercise type and elbow angle on vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity during a push-up plus exercise.

Authors:  Jun G San Juan; David N Suprak; Sean M Roach; Marc Lyda
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.