| Literature DB >> 35992402 |
Muhammad Sohaib1, Asif Ali Safeer2, Abdul Majeed2.
Abstract
Social media marketing has become one of the most significant growth paths for many businesses in today's world. However, many companies are still unclear about using social media marketing to get their advantages, particularly in an e-commerce environment. In this background, this study is proposed to examine the effects of social media marketing activities (SMMAs) (interactivity, informativeness, word-of-mouth-WOM, personalization, and trendiness) on relationship quality, such as commitment, trust, and satisfaction in order to predict consumers' online repurchase intentions in China's e-commerce environment. This study proposed a theoretical model by using the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) theory. Using a structured questionnaire and purposive sampling, this study examined the responses of 403 consumers through partial least square-structural equation modeling. The findings discovered that SMMAs significantly strengthen the relationship quality factors, such as commitment, trust, and satisfaction, which in turn positively increase consumer online repurchase intentions in China's e-commerce industry. This is novel research that contributes to the S-O-R theory and provides several managerial guidelines that assist managers in improving their business performance in the e-commerce industry. This research also highlighted some limitations.Entities:
Keywords: E-Commerce; commitment; online repurchase intentions; satisfaction; social media marketing activities (SMMAs); trust
Year: 2022 PMID: 35992402 PMCID: PMC9389151 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Proposed research model.
Targeted audience information.
| Number | % | |
| No. of participants | 403 | 100.00% |
|
| ||
| Male | 186 | 46.15% |
| Female | 217 | 53.85% |
|
| ||
| 18–22 | 90 | 22.33% |
| 23–27 | 174 | 43.18% |
| 28–32 | 97 | 24.07% |
| 33–37 | 42 | 10.42% |
|
| ||
| Bachelor | 108 | 26.80% |
| Master | 219 | 54.34% |
| Doctoral | 55 | 13.65% |
| Other professional degree | 21 | 5.21% |
|
| ||
| Student | 289 | 71.71% |
| Private and government organizations employee | 70 | 17.37% |
| Self-own business | 31 | 7.69% |
| Unemployed | 13 | 3.23% |
|
| ||
| Up to ¥7,000 | 162 | 40.20% |
| ¥7,001– ¥12,000 | 111 | 27.54% |
| ¥12,001– ¥17,000 | 59 | 14.64% |
| ¥17,001–¥22,000 | 56 | 13.90% |
| More than ¥22,000 | 15 | 3.72% |
|
| ||
| Up to 2 times weekly | 133 | 33.00% |
| 3–5 times fortnightly | 175 | 43.42% |
| More than 5 times monthly | 95 | 23.57% |
Constructs loading, Cronbach’s Alpha, CR, and AVE values.
| Items | Loading | Cronbach’s alpha | CR | AVE | |
| SMMAs | INF | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| INT | 0.83 | ||||
| PER | 0.89 | ||||
| TRD | 0.88 | ||||
| WOM | 0.87 | ||||
| CMT | CMT1 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.85 |
| CMT2 | 0.91 | ||||
| CMT3 | 0.92 | ||||
| TRT | TRT1 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.87 |
| TRT2 | 0.93 | ||||
| TRT3 | 0.93 | ||||
| SAT | SAT1 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.85 |
| SAT2 | 0.93 | ||||
| SAT3 | 0.92 | ||||
| ORPI | ORPI1 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.85 |
| ORPI2 | 0.92 | ||||
| ORPI3 | 0.92 |
SMMAs, Social media marketing activities; CMT, Commitment; TRT, Trust; SAT, Satisfaction; ORPI, Online Repurchase intentions.
Fornell-Larcker criterion.
| CMT | ORPI | SAT | SMMA | TRT | |
|
| 0.92 | ||||
|
| 0.63 | 0.92 | |||
|
| 0.81 | 0.62 | 0.92 | ||
|
| 0.73 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 0.87 | |
|
| 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.93 |
Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio.
| CMT | ORPI | SAT | SMMA | TRT | |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.70 | ||||
|
| 0.89 | 0.68 | |||
|
| 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.81 | ||
|
| 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.79 |
FIGURE 2Structural model significance, R2 and Q2-values. (t > 2.58 at **p < 0.01); (t > 3.29 at ***p < 0.001); (two-tailed).
FIGURE 3Proposed model relationships and loading values.
Hypotheses testing results.
| Hypothesis | Relationships | β-value | Support | ||
|
| |||||
| H1 | SMMAs - > CMT | 0.73 | 21.56 | Yes | |
| H2 | SMMAs - > TRT | 0.74 | 22.52 | Yes | |
| H3 | SMMAs - > SAT | 0.75 | 26.11 | Yes | |
| H4 | SMMAs - > ORPI | −0.05 | 0.50 | No | |
| H5 | CMT - > ORPI | 0.24 | 2.74 | Yes | |
| H6 | TRT - > ORPI | 0.30 | 3.49 | Yes | |
| H7 | SAT - > ORPI | 0.23 | 2.91 | Yes | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SMMAs - > CMT - > ORPI | 0.17 | −0.05 | Full | 0.12 | |
| SMMAs - > TRT - > ORPI | 0.22 | −0.05 | Full | 0.17 | |
| SMMAs - > SAT - > ORPI | 0.17 | −0.05 | Full | 0.12 | |
|
| |||||
| SMMAs - > ORPI | 0.57 | −0.05 | 0.52 | ||
“(t > 2.58 at **p < 0.01); (t > 3.29 at ***p < 0.001); (two-tailed).”
FIGURE 4IPMA results presentation.
FIGURE 5IPMA performance and importance analysis.