| Literature DB >> 35111111 |
Khalid Jamil1, Liu Dunnan1, Rana Faizan Gul1, Muhammad Usman Shehzad2, Syed Hussain Mustafa Gillani3, Fazal Hussain Awan1.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore social media marketing activities (SMMAs) and their impact on consumer intentions (continuance, participate, and purchase). This study also analyzes the mediating roles of social identification and satisfaction. The participants in this study were experienced users of two social media platforms Facebook and Instagram in Pakistan. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from respondents. We used an online community to invite Facebook and Instagram users to complete the questionnaire in the designated online questionnaire system. Data were collected from 353 respondents, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data. Results show that SMMAs have a significant impact on the intentions of users. Furthermore, social identification mediates the relationship between social media activities and satisfaction, and satisfaction mediates the relationship between social media activities and the intentions of users. This will help marketers how to attract customers to develop their intentions. This is the first novel study that used SMMAs to address the user intentions with the role of social identification and satisfaction in the context of Pakistan.Entities:
Keywords: continuance intention; participate intention; purchase intention; satisfaction; social identification; social media marketing activities
Year: 2022 PMID: 35111111 PMCID: PMC8803150 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.808525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Conceptual framework.
Inner model evaluation.
| Variables | Item loading | AVE | CR | α | |
| Continuance intention | CI1 | 0.887 | 0.794 | 0.880 | 0.712 |
| CI2 | 0.756 | ||||
| CI3 | 0.881 | ||||
| Customization | Cust1 | 0.759 | 0.652 | 0.851 | 0.741 |
| Cust2 | 0.878 | ||||
| Cust3 | 0.679 | ||||
| Cust4 | 0.844 | ||||
| Entertainment | E1 | 0.781 | 0.687 | 0.865 | 0.762 |
| E2 | 0.884 | ||||
| E3 | 0.719 | ||||
| E4 | 0.861 | ||||
| Interaction | Int1 | 0.840 | 0.753 | 0.859 | 0.671 |
| Int2 | 0.762 | ||||
| Int3 | 0.756 | ||||
| Int4 | 0.724 | ||||
| Int5 | 0.858 | ||||
| Int6 | 0.799 | ||||
| Participant intention | PI1 | 0.872 | 0.894 | 0.934 | 0.825 |
| PI2 | 0.940 | ||||
| PI3 | 0.913 | ||||
| Purchase intention | PuI1 | 0.896 | 0.652 | 0.850 | 0.739 |
| PuI2 | 0.822 | ||||
| Social identification | SI1 | 0.775 | 0.907 | 0.929 | 0.685 |
| SI2 | 0.815 | ||||
| SI3 | 0.772 | ||||
| SI4 | 0.828 | ||||
| SI5 | 0.819 | ||||
| Satisfaction | Satis1 | 0.861 | 0.862 | 0.900 | 0.643 |
| Satis2 | 0.778 | ||||
| Satis3 | 0.807 | ||||
| Satis4 | 0.874 | ||||
| Satis5 | 0.833 | ||||
| Satis6 | 0.808 | ||||
| Trendiness | Trn1 | 0.852 | 0.900 | 0.952 | 0.909 |
| Trn2 | 0.955 | ||||
| Trn3 | 0.822 | ||||
| Trn4 | 0.952 | ||||
| Word of mouth | WOM1 | 0.767 | 0.685 | 0.864 | 0.760 |
| WOM2 | 0.868 | ||||
| WOM3 | 0.788 | ||||
| WOM4 | 0.876 |
FIGURE 2Measurement model.
Discriminant validity.
| Fornell–Larcker criterion | Heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) ratios | ||||||||||||
| CI | PI | PUI | Sat | SI | SMMA | CI | PI | PUI | Sat | SI | SMMA | ||
| CI | 0.844 | CI | 0.813 | ||||||||||
| PI | 0.682 | 0.908 | PI | 0.854 | 0.873 | ||||||||
| PUI | 0.622 | 0.714 | 0.860 | PUI | 0.765 | 0.825 | 0.789 | ||||||
| Sat | 0.792 | 0.745 | 0.739 | 0.827 | Sat | 0.847 | 0.869 | 0.786 | 0.876 | ||||
| SI | 0.778 | 0.769 | 0.798 | 0.818 | 0.802 | SI | 0.785 | 0.854 | 0.734 | 0.786 | 0.768 | ||
| SMMA | 0.823 | 0.879 | 0.839 | 0.821 | 0.605 | 0.770 | SMMA | 0.759 | 0.769 | 0.945 | 0.804 | 0.846 | 0.876 |
CI, continuance intention; PI, participate intention; PUI, purchase intention; Sat, satisfaction; SI, social identification; SMMA, social media marketing activities.
Predictive accuracy and relevance of the model.
| Construct | R-square (R2) | (Q2) |
| Continuance intention | 0.627 | 0.430 |
| Participate intention | 0.555 | 0.452 |
| Purchase intention | 0.545 | 0.395 |
| Satisfaction | 0.809 | 0.544 |
| Social identification | 0.818 | 0.512 |
Hypothesis testing.
| Hypothesis | Path coefficient ( | Confidence interval | Decision | |||
| H1 | SMMA - > SI | 0.905 (36.570) | 0.838 to 0.937 | 4.507 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H2 | SMMA - > Sat | 0.634 (8.477) | 0.443 to 0.789 | 0.383 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H3 | SI- > Sat | 0.284 (4.348) | 0.137 to 392 | 0.077 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H4 | Sat - > CI | 0.792 (15.513) | 0.791 to 0.872 | 1.678 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H5 | Sat - > PI | 0.745 (12.041) | 0.596 to 0.835 | 1.246 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H6 | Sat - > PUI | 0.739 (12.397) | 0.593 to 0.824 | 1.200 | 0.000 | Accepted |
FIGURE 3Structural model.
A mediation analysis.
| Hypotheses | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total Effect | VIF | Decision |
| SMM- > SI- > SAT | B = 0.213, | B = 0.257, | B = 0.284, | 75% | Supported |
| SI- > SAT- > CI | B = 0.342, | B = 0.225, | B = 0.425, | 64% | Supported |
| SI- > SAT- > PAI | B = 0.324, | B = 0.211, | B = 0.439, | 73% | Supported |
| SI- > SAT- > PAI | β = 0.312, | β = 0.213, | B = 0.431, | 73% | Supported |