Literature DB >> 35991115

Diagnostic Reasoning of Resident Physicians in the Age of Clinical Pathways.

Morgan Congdon1, Caitlin B Clancy2, Dorene F Balmer3, Hannah Anderson4, Naveen Muthu5, Christopher P Bonafide6, Irit R Rasooly7.   

Abstract

Background: Development of skills in diagnostic reasoning is paramount to the transition from novice to expert clinicians. Efforts to standardize approaches to diagnosis and treatment using clinical pathways are increasingly common. The effects of implementing pathways into systems of care during diagnostic education and practice among pediatric residents are not well described. Objective: To characterize pediatric residents' perceptions of the tradeoffs between clinical pathway use and diagnostic reasoning.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study from May to December 2019. Senior pediatric residents from a high-volume general pediatric inpatient service at an academic hospital participated in semi-structured interviews. We utilized a basic interpretive qualitative approach informed by a dual process diagnostic reasoning framework.
Results: Nine residents recruited via email were interviewed. Residents reported using pathways when admitting patients and during teaching rounds. All residents described using pathways primarily as management tools for patients with a predetermined diagnosis, rather than as aids in formulating a diagnosis. As such, pathways primed residents to circumvent crucial steps of deliberate diagnostic reasoning. However, residents relied on bedside assessment to identify when patients are "not quite fitting the mold" of the current pathway diagnosis, facilitating recalibration of the diagnostic process. Conclusions: This study identifies important educational implications at the intersection of residents' cognitive diagnostic processes and use of clinical pathways. We highlight potential challenges clinical pathways pose for skill development in diagnostic reasoning by pediatric residents. We suggest opportunities for educators to leverage clinical pathways as a framework for development of these skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35991115      PMCID: PMC9380621          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01032.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  38 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 2.  Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning.

Authors:  Judith L Bowen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors.

Authors:  John W Ely; Mark L Graber; Pat Croskerry
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Joseph Rencic
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process.

Authors:  Martha Quinn; Jane Forman; Molly Harrod; Suzanne Winter; Karen E Fowler; Sarah L Krein; Ashwin Gupta; Sanjay Saint; Hardeep Singh; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 6.  The Five-Minute Moment.

Authors:  Jeffrey Chi; Maja Artandi; John Kugler; Errol Ozdalga; Poonam Hosamani; Elizabeth Koehler; Lars Osterberg; Junaid Zaman; Sonoo Thadaney; Andrew Elder; Abraham Verghese
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Clinical Reasoning: Talk the Talk or Just Walk the Walk?

Authors:  Gurpreet Dhaliwal; Jonathan Ilgen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

8.  Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning.

Authors:  V L Patel; A W Kushniruk; S Yang; J F Yale
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Minimizing diagnostic error: the importance of follow-up and feedback.

Authors:  Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Do electronic health records help or hinder medical education?

Authors:  Jonathan U Peled; Oren Sagher; Jay B Morrow; Alison E Dobbie
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.