Literature DB >> 24400902

Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naïve host ecosystem.

Nadir Erbilgin1, Cary Ma1, Caroline Whitehouse2, Bin Shan1, Ahmed Najar1, Maya Evenden3.   

Abstract

Host plant secondary chemistry can have cascading impacts on host and range expansion of herbivorous insect populations. We investigated the role of host secondary compounds on pheromone production by the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) (MPB) and beetle attraction in response to a historical (lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and a novel (jack pine, Pinus banksiana) hosts, as pheromones regulate the host colonization process. Beetles emit the same pheromones from both hosts, but more trans-verbenol, the primary aggregation pheromone, was emitted by female beetles on the novel host. The phloem of the novel host contains more α-pinene, a secondary compound that is the precursor for trans-verbenol production in beetle, than the historical host. Beetle-induced emission of 3-carene, another secondary compound found in both hosts, was also higher from the novel host. Field tests showed that the addition of 3-carene to the pheromone mixture mimicking the aggregation pheromones produced from the two host species increased beetle capture. We conclude that chemical similarity between historical and novel hosts has facilitated host expansion of MPB in jack pine forests through the exploitation of common host secondary compounds for pheromone production and aggregation on the hosts. Furthermore, broods emerging from the novel host were larger in terms of body size.
© 2013 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2013 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dendroctonus ponderosae; Pinus banksiana; boreal forest; invasion biology; jack pine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24400902     DOI: 10.1111/nph.12573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  26 in total

1.  Successful Colonization of Lodgepole Pine Trees by Mountain Pine Beetle Increased Monoterpene Production and Exhausted Carbohydrate Reserves.

Authors:  Marla Roth; Altaf Hussain; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.

Authors:  Janet Therrien; Charles J Mason; Jonathan A Cale; Aaron Adams; Brian H Aukema; Cameron R Currie; Kenneth F Raffa; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Weathering the storm: how lodgepole pine trees survive mountain pine beetle outbreaks.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; Jonathan A Cale; Altaf Hussain; Guncha Ishangulyyeva; Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Shiyang Zhao
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle.

Authors:  Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Patrick Sherwood; Pierluigi Bonello; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Primary and Secondary Metabolite Profiles of Lodgepole Pine Trees Change with Elevation, but Not with Latitude.

Authors:  Melanie Mullin; J G Klutsch; J A Cale; A Hussain; S Zhao; C Whitehouse; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Toxicity of Monoterpene Structure, Diversity and Concentration to Mountain Pine Beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae: Beetle Traits Matter More.

Authors:  Mary L Reid; Jagdeep K Sekhon; Lanielle M LaFramboise
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Ectomycorrhizal fungal species differentially affect the induced defensive chemistry of lodgepole pine.

Authors:  Sanat S Kanekar; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The influence of genetics, defensive chemistry and the fungal microbiome on disease outcome in whitebark pine trees.

Authors:  Lorinda S Bullington; Ylva Lekberg; Richard Sniezko; Beau Larkin
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.663

Review 10.  The potential for host switching via ecological fitting in the emerald ash borer-host plant system.

Authors:  Don Cipollini; Donnie L Peterson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.