Precision deuteration has become part of the medicinal chemist's toolbox, but its usefulness can be undermined by unpredictable metabolic switch effects. Herein we report the deuteration of doxophylline, a drug used in the treatment of asthma and COPD that undergoes extensive oxidative metabolism. Labeling of the main metabolic soft spots triggered an unexpected multidirectional metabolic switch that, while not improving the pharmacokinetic parameters, changed the metabolic scenario and, in turn, the pharmacodynamic features in two murine models of lung injury.
Precision deuteration has become part of the medicinal chemist's toolbox, but its usefulness can be undermined by unpredictable metabolic switch effects. Herein we report the deuteration of doxophylline, a drug used in the treatment of asthma and COPD that undergoes extensive oxidative metabolism. Labeling of the main metabolic soft spots triggered an unexpected multidirectional metabolic switch that, while not improving the pharmacokinetic parameters, changed the metabolic scenario and, in turn, the pharmacodynamic features in two murine models of lung injury.
Asthma, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchiectasis fall under the umbrella
of chronic respiratory diseases and are three closely linked disorders
whose phenotype and etiology frequently overlap. Despite the fact
that novel medications have emerged, methylxanthines are still indicated
as add-on agents for the treatment of both asthma and COPD by GINA[1] and GOLD[2] guidelines
(i.e., global clinical guidelines for the treatment
of asthma and COPD, respectively). In contrast, their use in bronchiectasis
is off-label, and their potential in this clinical setting is still
elusive and requires further investigations.Theophylline (1) is the most widely used methylxanthine
because of its marked bronchodilator activity and anti-inflammatory
properties (Figure ).[3,4] The precise mechanism of action has not been fully
elucidated yet, but its activity spans from nonselective inhibition
of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) to the inhibition of phosphoinositide
3-kinases δ (PI3Kδ) and from adenosine receptor antagonism
to the restoration of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity.[5] Moreover, theophylline significantly reduces
the number of neutrophils and eosinophils in the airways. While its
use is encouraged by its low cost and high oral bioavailability, theophylline
suffers from side effects such as CNS stimulation, cardiac arrhythmias,
and gastrointestinal effects, leading to a narrow therapeutic window
that warrants strict monitoring of its levels in the blood. It also
interferes with CYP1A2, CYP2E21, and CYP3A4, resulting in drug–drug
interactions with many drugs metabolized by these pathways.[6] Because of these drawbacks, theophylline is relegated
to second- or third-line therapy in most treatment guidelines.
Figure 1
Structures
of theophylline and novophyllines.
Structures
of theophylline and novophyllines.The clinical benefit of theophylline has spurred
in the previous
century the development of synthetic analogues named novophyllines
with the aim of improving the risk-to-benefit ratio.[7] These methylxanthines include bamiphylline (2), acebrophylline (3), and doxophylline (4) (Figure ) and have
received regulatory approval for their use in treatment of asthma
and COPD in specific parts of the world.Doxophylline differs
from theophylline in that it contains a methylene
1,3-dioxolane group at position 7 (Figure ), resulting in a different profile.[8] At the pharmacological level, it has been demonstrated
to positively interact with β2 adrenoreceptors, with
less affinity for α1 and α2 receptors,
eliciting relaxation of blood vessel and bronchial smooth muscles.[9] Unlike theophylline, it has a low affinity for
adenosine receptors, does not inhibit any of the known PDE isoforms
(except for PDE2A1), and does not interact with HDACs.[10] With regard to its anti-inflammatory activity,
doxophylline has been shown to reduce leukocyte count and recruitment
into the airways.[11] A recent report showed
that it reduces the oxidative burst in human monocytes, an effect
mediated by the inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) activity, differently
from theophylline.[12] From a toxicological
perspective, indirect comparisons through meta-analyses suggest that
it might have a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio compared with theophylline,[13−17] pointing to this novophylline as a safer therapeutic option for
the treatment of chronic respiratory diseases.[18,19]In humans, doxophylline is readily absorbed after oral administration
but promptly eliminated, requiring multiple daily dosing to ensure
efficient plasma levels.[8]In vitro metabolic studies in rat liver microsomes identified theophylline
and the 7-hydroxyethyl ester of 7-theophylline acetic acid (T-COOH, 6) as metabolites of doxophylline.[20] Zhao et al. showed that in men, doxophylline undergoes
a more extensive oxidative metabolism.[21] After both incubations in human liver fractions and intravenous
administration, a metabolic scenario is proposed where different metabolic
pathways occur (Figure ). The main route consists of extensive oxidation of the ethylene
moiety on the 1,3-dioxolane ring leading to the formation of 7-theophylline
acetaldehyde (T-CHO, 5), which is further converted to
T-COOH 6 or reduced to 7-hydroxyethyltheophylline (etophylline, 7) (route 1). The second pathway is involved oxidation of
the tertiary carbon atom on the 1,3-dioxolane ring, with the formation
of the 7-hydroxyethyl ester of T-COOH, which can hydrolyze in vivo to afford T-COOH 6 (route 2). In addition,
four minor biotransformations are identified (routes 3–6),
leading to the formation of theophylline, N-demethylation to form
dm-doxophylline (9), dehydrogenation of the 1,3-dioxolane
ring to give dh-doxophylline (10), and oxidation of the
xanthine nucleus to give ox-doxophylline (11), respectively
(Figure ).
Figure 2
Metabolism
of doxophylline in the human liver. Bold arrows represent
metabolic conversion extents of >20%. Solid arrows represent metabolic
conversion extents of 0.1–20%. Dashed arrows represent metabolic
conversion extents of <0.1%.[21]
Metabolism
of doxophylline in the human liver. Bold arrows represent
metabolic conversion extents of >20%. Solid arrows represent metabolic
conversion extents of 0.1–20%. Dashed arrows represent metabolic
conversion extents of <0.1%.[21]By virtue of the kinetic isotope effect (KIE),
deuterium has been
shown to increase the stability toward the C–D cleavage step
and induce resistance from oxidative metabolism. Many successful examples
have recently been reported in which deuterium incorporation in place
of protium leads to a beneficial effect in terms of longer half-life,
higher exposure, or reduced toxicity, drug–drug interactions,
and interpatient variability.[22−24] The utility of deuterium labeling
in drug R&D is exemplified by the approval in 2017 of deutetrabenazine,
the first and to date only approved deuterated drug on the market.[25] In the field of methylxanthines, a very recent
report shows that d9-caffeine, bearing
three deuterated methyl groups, exhibits prolonged systemic and brain
exposure compared with its proteo counterpart following oral administration.[26]With the aim of investigating the effect
of deuterium incorporation
at the main metabolic soft spots of doxophylline, we synthesized two
deuterated analogues, d4-doxophylline
(16) and d7-doxophylline
(20) (Scheme ),[27] and evaluated their pharmacokinetic
profiles. In d4-doxophylline, the ethylene
bridge of the 1,3-dioxolane ring was isotopically labeled, while in d7-doxophylline the entire methylene 1,3-dioxolane
group was isotopically labeled. In parallel, we assessed the efficacies
of doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, and d7-doxophylline in two murine models that resemble
chronic lung diseases, where pulmonary injury is induced by bleomycin
(BLM) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Deuterated Analogues of Doxophylline
To this aim, a straightforward “deuterated
pool strategy”
was undertaken using commercially available deuterated substrates,
namely, d4-acetaldehyde or/and d4-ethylene glycol. The general procedure, independent
of the isotopic composition, consists of three steps (Scheme ). Acetaldehyde is brominated
using bromine in dichloromethane at 0 °C to give 2-bromoacetaldehyde,
which is used in the next step without purification. The addition
of ethylene glycol in the presence of (±)-camphor-10-sulfonic
acid as the catalyst in toluene at 80 °C affords the corresponding
acetal. After purification, the bromomethyl-1,3-dioxolane undergoes
nucleophilic substitution with 1,3-dimethyl-1H-purine-2,6(3H,7H)-dione in the presence of potassium
carbonate in dimethylformamide at 115 °C to yield the final product.
The synthesis proceeded smoothly in high yields for both products
and allowed the preparation of the two final compounds on a scale
of 15 g.A comparative pharmacokinetic study was then performed
by evaluating
the plasma concentration profiles of doxophylline and its deuterated
analogues after intravenous and oral single-dose administration in
mice and minipigs. Contrary to the expectations, deuteration did not
result in increased exposure in either animal species (Tables and 2 and Figure ). In
mice the area under the curve (AUC) decreased for deuterated doxophyllines,
especially after oral administration (44% and 40% for d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline,
respectively; Table and Figure b), suggesting
a significant role of first-pass metabolism. Since the deuterium kinetic
isotope effect is often affected by interspecies variability,[28] a PK study was also performed in minipigs. However,
following both oral and intravenous administration, the two deuterated
analogues showed very similar pharmacokinetic profiles (Table and Figure c,d) compared to doxophylline.
Table 1
Pharmacokinetic Data for Doxophylline
and Its Deuterated Analogues d4-Doxophylline
and d7-Doxophylline Following Single-Dose
Administration in Mice
parameter
doxophylline
d4-doxophylline
d7-doxophylline
Intravenous (20 mg/kg)
t1/2 (h)
1.1
1.5
1.0
Cmax (μg/L)
15506
12288
10687
AUC0–t (μg L–1 h–1)
6732
5413
4922
CL (L h–1 kg–1)
2.9
3.7
4.1
Oral (80 mg/kg)
t1/2 (h)
1.6
1.7
2.1
Cmax (μg/L)
18693
16782
19203
AUC0–t (μg L–1 h–1)
55947
31429
33632
CL/F (L h–1 kg–1)
1.4
2.5
2.4
Table 2
Pharmacokinetic Data for Doxophylline
and Its Deuterated Analogues d4-Doxophylline
and d7-Doxophylline Following Single-Dose
Administration in minipigs
parameter
doxophylline
d4-doxophylline
d7-doxophylline
Intravenous (5 mg/kg)
t1/2 (h)
6.2
6.2
6.5
Cmax (μg/L)
7501
7421
8265
AUC0–t (μg L–1 h–1)
47729
49190
47009
CL (L h–1 kg–1)
0.1
0.1
0.1
Oral (20 mg/kg)
t1/2 (h)
11.0
10.8
12.6
Cmax (μg/L)
13961
15811
12998
AUC0–t (μg L–1 h–1)
217271
235790
222429
CL/F (L h–1 kg–1)
0.07
0.07
0.07
Figure 3
Drug concentration–time curves of doxophylline and its deuterated
analogues d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline after single-dose administration:
(a) mice, iv, 20 mg/kg; (b) mice, oral, 80 mg/kg; (c) minipigs, iv,
5 mg/kg; (d) minipigs, oral, 20 mg/kg.
Drug concentration–time curves of doxophylline and its deuterated
analogues d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline after single-dose administration:
(a) mice, iv, 20 mg/kg; (b) mice, oral, 80 mg/kg; (c) minipigs, iv,
5 mg/kg; (d) minipigs, oral, 20 mg/kg.From an analysis of the levels of metabolites in
mice plasma, it
was seen that deuteration of the dioxolane ring (d4-doxophylline) triggered considerable alterations in
the relative abundances of the metabolites generated. In more detail,
increased formation of T-COOH 6 was evident (about 3-fold
higher level at 0.5 h), concomitant with a decreased level of etophylline 7 (Figure ). This is mainly related to a marked increase of the metabolic route
2, in which the electronic influence of the two oxygen atoms adjacent
to the target sp3 carbon atom greatly facilitates oxene
attack and homolytic cleavage of the C–H bond.[29] Furthermore, a significant increase in the plasmatic levels
of theophylline 1 and dm-doxophylline 9 as
well as a decrease in the dehydrogenated metabolite dh-doxophylline 10 also occurred (Figure ). Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that deuteration
of the dioxolane ring of doxophylline promotes a multidirectional
metabolic switch (Figure ) that does not result in the desired improvement in the pharmacokinetic
parameters.
Figure 4
Levels of doxophylline metabolites in mice plasma. *Metabolites
were quantified on the basis of a T-COOH calibration curve or nondeuterated
metabolite standards.
Figure 5
Metabolic switch of the deuterated doxophyllines.
Levels of doxophylline metabolites in mice plasma. *Metabolites
were quantified on the basis of a T-COOH calibration curve or nondeuterated
metabolite standards.Metabolic switch of the deuterated doxophyllines.With regard to d7-doxophylline,
only
a semiquantitative determination was feasible because its metabolites
(with the exception of theophylline) retain deuterium atoms (see the Supporting Information for structures). Indeed,
the presence of deuterium lowers the signals in the electrospray ionization
source, and the corresponding deuterated standards of the metabolites
would have been necessary to perform an accurate quantification. Moreover,
no reference standard was available for the quantification of the
metabolites dm-doxophylline 9 and dh-doxophylline 10, and their relative abundances were expressed as peak areas
of the corresponding accurate-mass ions. Despite these limitations,
we could detect diminished levels of all of the above-mentioned metabolites
except for dm-doxophylline 9, suggesting that, although
to a lesser extent than for d4-doxophylline,
the metabolic switch occurs also for d7-doxophylline and contributes to the reduction of its bioavailability
(Figures and 5).We next investigated whether the different
metabolic scenarios
of the three compounds would in turn affect their pharmacodynamics
because of the possible influence of each metabolite on the in vivo efficacy. For instance, T-COOH 6 has
been reported to be bronchodilator because of the specific inhibition
of PDE-III and IV isozymes,[30] while etophylline 7 is significantly less active than doxophylline in terms
of antibronchospastic and antiasthmatic effects.[31] To this aim, we exploited two models of lung injury, one
induced by BLM and the other byP. aeruginosa.With regard to the BLM-induced lung injury, we treated mice
orally
with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline daily (Figure a). As shown in Figure b, intratracheal instillation
of BLM resulted in marked accumulation of immune cells in bronchoalveolar
lavage (BAL) that was significantly reverted by treatment with doxophylline
and d7-doxophylline, while the effect
of d4-doxophylline was of lesser extent
and lacked statistical significance. This was also confirmed by the
ratio between wet and dry lung (Figure c), which reflected decreased liquid accumulation in
doxophylline- and d7-treated mice, and
also by determination of MPO, a marker of neutrophil activation, whose
activity was decreased in doxophylline- and d7-treated mice (Figure d). Histological examination by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
staining revealed a decrease in the inflammatory interstitial infiltrate
in the groups treated with doxophylline and its analogues, especially
in doxophylline- and d7-treated mice compared
with d4-treated ones (Figure e). Finally, to investigate
the fibrosis, we performed a semiquantitative analysis on the Masson’s
Trichrome- and Picrosirius red-stained sections in order to evaluate
the presence and the packing of collagen fibers. A slight tendency
toward reduction in thickness and packing of collagen fibers was seen
in doxophylline-, d4-, and d7-treated mice compared with the vehicle group, and this
was mainly observed in the doxophylline and d7-doxophylline groups, as shown in Figure f,g. Furthermore, an interesting association
of the inflammatory infiltrate and stromal remodeling was observed.
Indeed, the decrease in the interstitial inflammatory state led to
a reduction of fibrosis in the doxophylline- and d7-treated groups, as can be observed in the respective
representative images.
Figure 6
Model of pulmonary fibrosis induced by bleomycin. Doxophylline
and d7-doxophylline attenuate BLM-induced
structural damage and lung fibrosis in mice. (a) Representative scheme
of the BLM-induced lung injury model. (b) Total BAL cellularity of
sham mice (not treated) and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not
with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported
as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (c) Wet/dry lung
weight ratio of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not with
80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported
as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (d) MPO activity
in lungs of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not with 80
mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline). Results are reported as mean
± SEM of three independent experiments. (e) Representative images
of H&E staining of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or
not with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). (f, g) Representative
images of (f) Masson’s trichrome staining and (g) Picrorius
red staining of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not with
80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). p values: *, p < 0.05; **, p <
0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Model of pulmonary fibrosis induced by bleomycin. Doxophylline
and d7-doxophylline attenuate BLM-induced
structural damage and lung fibrosis in mice. (a) Representative scheme
of the BLM-induced lung injury model. (b) Total BAL cellularity of
sham mice (not treated) and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not
with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported
as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (c) Wet/dry lung
weight ratio of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not with
80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported
as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (d) MPO activity
in lungs of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not with 80
mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline). Results are reported as mean
± SEM of three independent experiments. (e) Representative images
of H&E staining of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or
not with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). (f, g) Representative
images of (f) Masson’s trichrome staining and (g) Picrorius
red staining of sham and bleomycin-treated mice (treated or not with
80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). p values: *, p < 0.05; **, p <
0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.In the second setting of pulmonary damage (Figure a), P. aeruginosa injection induced increased total BAL
cellularity in vehicle-treated
and d4-treated mice compared with sham
mice (Figure b). Doxophylline
and d7-doxophylline treatment significantly
reduced the number of BAL cells (Figure b). Lung edema at day 7 was measured as a
ratio of wet to dry weight of excised lung tissue (Figure c). Administration of doxophylline
and d7-doxophylline considerably decreased P. aeruginosa-induced lung inflammation in comparison
with vehicle-treated animals and d4-treated
mice. MPO activity showed increased polymorphonuclear cell infiltration
in tissues from vehicle-treated mice, whereas treatment with doxophylline
and d7-doxophylline significantly reduced
the MPO activity while d4-doxophylline
had a lesser nonsignificant effect (Figure d). Histological examination by H&E staining
showed a reduction of the inflammatory interstitial infiltrate in
the groups treated with doxophylline and its analogues, especially
in the doxophylline- and d7-treated mice
compared with the d4-treated ones (Figure e).
Figure 7
Model of pulmonary fibrosis
induced by P. aeruginosa. (a) Representative
scheme of P. aeruginosa-induced lung
injury model. (b) Total BAL cellularity of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated or not with 80
mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported as mean
± SEM of 10 mice for all groups. (c) Wet/dry lung weight ratio
of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice
(treated or not with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, or d7-doxophylline).
Results are reported as mean ± SEM of 10 mice for all groups.
(d) MPO activity in lungs of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated or not with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported as mean ± SEM of 10 mice
for all groups. (e) Representative images of H&E staining of sham
and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated
or not with 80 mg/doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). (f) Representative
images of Masson’s trichrome staining of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated or not with 80
mg/doxophylline, d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline). p values:
*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01;
***, p < 0.001; ****, p <
0.0001.
Model of pulmonary fibrosis
induced by P. aeruginosa. (a) Representative
scheme of P. aeruginosa-induced lung
injury model. (b) Total BAL cellularity of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated or not with 80
mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported as mean
± SEM of 10 mice for all groups. (c) Wet/dry lung weight ratio
of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice
(treated or not with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, or d7-doxophylline).
Results are reported as mean ± SEM of 10 mice for all groups.
(d) MPO activity in lungs of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated or not with 80 mg/kg doxophylline, d4-doxophylline, or d7-doxophylline). Results are reported as mean ± SEM of 10 mice
for all groups. (e) Representative images of H&E staining of sham
and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated
or not with 80 mg/doxophylline, d4-doxophylline,
or d7-doxophylline). (f) Representative
images of Masson’s trichrome staining of sham and Pseudomonas-treated mice (treated or not with 80
mg/doxophylline, d4-doxophylline and d7-doxophylline). p values:
*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01;
***, p < 0.001; ****, p <
0.0001.The trend of an effect of doxophylline and d7-doxophylline and a lesser or no effect from d4-doxophylline was observed also in other parameters
investigated,
such as collagen deposition (Figure f), immunohistochemistry of nitrotyrosine (Figure S2a), and PAR (Figure S2b). Finally, TUNEL assays were done to evaluate apoptosis
in treated tissues, and again there was an increased apoptotic signature
in lungs exposed to P. aeruginosa that
was reverted both by doxophylline and d7-doxophylline, whereas d4-doxophylline
did not have any effect (Figure S2c).Overall, the two animal models are concordant in showing that doxophylline
has an important protective effect in lung injury and that this is
mimicked by d7-doxophylline, whereas d4-doxophylline has a lesser effect or no effect,
according to the model used. Even if there are no sufficient elements
to draw a clear correlation between the metabolic stabilities of d4- and d7-doxophylline,
the corresponding plasma levels of metabolites, and the in
vivo efficacy, it is evident that the different deuteration
patterns lead to distinct metabolite scenarios, which in turn appears
to influence the effect on lung injury. Indeed, it must be taken into
account that the pharmacological activity of methylxanthines observed in vivo is the result of the interaction of both the drug
itself and its structurally similar metabolites with multiple targets
that are still not fully elucidated and that on each of these targets
every single metabolite has a different potency. It must be also recognized
that besides the metabolic fate, other factors might contribute to
determining such differences in vivo, including an
effect of deuterium incorporation on plasma protein binding.[32]Bronchiectasis is characterized by permanent
enlargement of peripheral
bronchi accompanied by repeated respiratory infections, disabling
productive cough, and shortness of breath, resulting in loss of lung
function.[33,34] While this disorder shows an ever-increasing
and worrying prevalence,[35] no effective
pharmacological treatment is currently approved, and the search for
a therapy is complicated by the lack of an understanding of its pathophysiology
and by the complex etiology of the disease.[36] Indeed, it can be the result of several underlying causes, including
infections by P. aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, or other pathogens, dysregulated
immunity, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Therefore, no animal
model closely recapitulates the disorder, and different preclinical
settings must be used to represent the different subpopulations of
patients.[37] In spite of the surge of interest
in this disease, only a few disease-modifying agents are being evaluated
in clinical trials (e.g., A4 leukotriene hydrolases,
dipeptidyl peptidase-I inhibitors, elastase inhibitors, and CXC chemokine
receptor 2 antagonists),[38] and they mainly
target neutrophiles, the most abundant population recruited in airways,
together with macrophages.[34,39] In this context, doxophylline
might represent an effective treatment as it both relaxes airway smooth
muscle and has anti-inflammatory properties, with a profound impact
not only on neutrophils but also on monocytes and alveolar macrophages.
In February 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted an
orphan drug designation to doxophylline for treatment of bronchiectasis.[40] Moreover, a couple of patents claim a pharmaceutical
composition comprising doxophylline and the mucolytic agent erdosteine
to be used in treatment of bronchiectasis[41] and dosage forms of doxophylline to treat orphan respiratory diseases.[42] However, no data have been reported to support
this hypothesis to date.[7] In this Letter,
we have shown for the first time that both doxophylline and its d7 analogue are effective in two animal models
of chronic lung diseases that partly recapitulate bronchiectasis.
Contrary to our expectations, no improvement in pharmacokinetics between
doxophylline and its d4 and d7 analogues was observed, offering an enlightening example
of a deuterium-promoted multidirectional metabolic switch and confirming
the challenges associated with precision deuteration in drug R&D.