Literature DB >> 35973148

Optimal Wireless Reflux Monitoring Metrics to Predict Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy.

Rena Yadlapati1, C Prakash Gyawali2, Melina Masihi3, Dustin A Carlson3, Peter J Kahrilas3, Billy Darren Nix2, Anand Jain4, Joseph R Triggs5, Michael F Vaezi6, Leila Kia3, Alexander Kaizer7, John E Pandolfino3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory reflux monitoring performed off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the gold standard diagnostic test for nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the diagnostic metrics and optimal duration of monitoring are not well defined. This study evaluated the performance of multiple metrics across distinct durations of wireless reflux monitoring off PPI against the ability to discontinue PPI therapy in patients with suboptimal PPI response.
METHODS: This single-arm clinical trial performed over 4 years at 2 centers enrolled adults with troublesome GERD symptoms and inadequate response to > 8 weeks of PPI. Participants underwent 96-hour wireless pH monitoring off PPI. Primary outcome was whether the subject successfully discontinued PPI or resumed PPI within 3 weeks.
RESULTS: Of 132 participants, 30% discontinued PPI. Among multiple metrics assessed, total acid exposure time (AET) of 4.0% performed best in predicting PPI discontinuation (odds ratio 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.4, 6.4]; P = 0.006), with other thresholds of AET and DeMeester score performing comparably. AET was significantly higher on day 1 of monitoring compared with other days, and prognostic performance significantly declined when only assessing the first 48 hours of monitoring (area under the curve for 96 hours 0.63 vs area under the curve for 48 hours 0.57; P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: This clinical trial highlights the AET threshold of 4.0% as a high-performing prognostic marker of PPI discontinuation. 96 hours of monitoring performed better than 48 hours, in predicting ability to discontinue PPI. These data can inform current diagnostic approaches for patients with GERD symptoms who are unresponsive to PPI therapy.
Copyright © 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35973148      PMCID: PMC9532366          DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   12.045


  29 in total

1.  Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule.

Authors:  Brian E Lacy; Andrew C Dukowicz; Douglas J Robertson; Julia E Weiss; Pedro Teixeira; Maurice L Kelley
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; John G Hunter; Karen M Jones; Robert Lee; Brian R Smith; Hiroshi Mashimo; Vivian M Sanchez; Kerry B Dunbar; Thai H Pham; Uma K Murthy; Taewan Kim; Christian S Jackson; Jason M Wallen; Erik C von Rosenvinge; Jonathan P Pearl; Loren Laine; Anthony W Kim; Andrew M Kaz; Roger P Tatum; Ziad F Gellad; Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan; Joel H Rubenstein; Amir A Ghaferi; Wai-Kit Lo; Ronald S Fernando; Bobby S Chan; Shirley C Paski; Dawn Provenzale; Donald O Castell; David Lieberman; Rhonda F Souza; William D Chey; Stuart R Warren; Anne Davis-Karim; Shelby D Melton; Robert M Genta; Tracey Serpi; Kousick Biswas; Grant D Huang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Trajectory assessment is useful when day-to-day esophageal acid exposure varies in prolonged wireless pH monitoring.

Authors:  R Yadlapati; J D Ciolino; J Craft; S Roman; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Muhammad Aslam; Elif Yuksel; David Katzka; C Prakash Gyawali; Melina Mashi; John Pandolfino; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Hasak; Rena Yadlapati; Osama Altayar; Rami Sweis; Emily Tucker; Kevin Knowles; Mark Fox; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Association Between Response to Acid-Suppression Therapy and Efficacy of Antireflux Surgery in Patients With Extraesophageal Reflux.

Authors:  Joseph T Krill; Rishi D Naik; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Michael D Holzman; David O Francis; C Gaelyn Garrett; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters.

Authors:  G J Wiener; T M Morgan; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell; J W Sinclair; J E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

9.  Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Joel E Richter; Tina Ours; Jason M Guardino; Jennifer Chapman; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Value of pH Impedance Monitoring While on Twice-Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy to Identify Need for Escalation of Reflux Management.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Radu Tutuian; Frank Zerbib; Benjamin D Rogers; Marzio Frazzoni; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Nicola de Bortoli; Marcelo F Vela; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.