Rena Yadlapati1, C Prakash Gyawali2, Melina Masihi3, Dustin A Carlson3, Peter J Kahrilas3, Billy Darren Nix2, Anand Jain4, Joseph R Triggs5, Michael F Vaezi6, Leila Kia3, Alexander Kaizer7, John E Pandolfino3. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 5. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 7. University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory reflux monitoring performed off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the gold standard diagnostic test for nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the diagnostic metrics and optimal duration of monitoring are not well defined. This study evaluated the performance of multiple metrics across distinct durations of wireless reflux monitoring off PPI against the ability to discontinue PPI therapy in patients with suboptimal PPI response. METHODS: This single-arm clinical trial performed over 4 years at 2 centers enrolled adults with troublesome GERD symptoms and inadequate response to > 8 weeks of PPI. Participants underwent 96-hour wireless pH monitoring off PPI. Primary outcome was whether the subject successfully discontinued PPI or resumed PPI within 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of 132 participants, 30% discontinued PPI. Among multiple metrics assessed, total acid exposure time (AET) of 4.0% performed best in predicting PPI discontinuation (odds ratio 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.4, 6.4]; P = 0.006), with other thresholds of AET and DeMeester score performing comparably. AET was significantly higher on day 1 of monitoring compared with other days, and prognostic performance significantly declined when only assessing the first 48 hours of monitoring (area under the curve for 96 hours 0.63 vs area under the curve for 48 hours 0.57; P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: This clinical trial highlights the AET threshold of 4.0% as a high-performing prognostic marker of PPI discontinuation. 96 hours of monitoring performed better than 48 hours, in predicting ability to discontinue PPI. These data can inform current diagnostic approaches for patients with GERD symptoms who are unresponsive to PPI therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Ambulatory reflux monitoring performed off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the gold standard diagnostic test for nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the diagnostic metrics and optimal duration of monitoring are not well defined. This study evaluated the performance of multiple metrics across distinct durations of wireless reflux monitoring off PPI against the ability to discontinue PPI therapy in patients with suboptimal PPI response. METHODS: This single-arm clinical trial performed over 4 years at 2 centers enrolled adults with troublesome GERD symptoms and inadequate response to > 8 weeks of PPI. Participants underwent 96-hour wireless pH monitoring off PPI. Primary outcome was whether the subject successfully discontinued PPI or resumed PPI within 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of 132 participants, 30% discontinued PPI. Among multiple metrics assessed, total acid exposure time (AET) of 4.0% performed best in predicting PPI discontinuation (odds ratio 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.4, 6.4]; P = 0.006), with other thresholds of AET and DeMeester score performing comparably. AET was significantly higher on day 1 of monitoring compared with other days, and prognostic performance significantly declined when only assessing the first 48 hours of monitoring (area under the curve for 96 hours 0.63 vs area under the curve for 48 hours 0.57; P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: This clinical trial highlights the AET threshold of 4.0% as a high-performing prognostic marker of PPI discontinuation. 96 hours of monitoring performed better than 48 hours, in predicting ability to discontinue PPI. These data can inform current diagnostic approaches for patients with GERD symptoms who are unresponsive to PPI therapy.
Authors: Brian E Lacy; Andrew C Dukowicz; Douglas J Robertson; Julia E Weiss; Pedro Teixeira; Maurice L Kelley Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Stuart J Spechler; John G Hunter; Karen M Jones; Robert Lee; Brian R Smith; Hiroshi Mashimo; Vivian M Sanchez; Kerry B Dunbar; Thai H Pham; Uma K Murthy; Taewan Kim; Christian S Jackson; Jason M Wallen; Erik C von Rosenvinge; Jonathan P Pearl; Loren Laine; Anthony W Kim; Andrew M Kaz; Roger P Tatum; Ziad F Gellad; Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan; Joel H Rubenstein; Amir A Ghaferi; Wai-Kit Lo; Ronald S Fernando; Bobby S Chan; Shirley C Paski; Dawn Provenzale; Donald O Castell; David Lieberman; Rhonda F Souza; William D Chey; Stuart R Warren; Anne Davis-Karim; Shelby D Melton; Robert M Genta; Tracey Serpi; Kousick Biswas; Grant D Huang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dhyanesh A Patel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Muhammad Aslam; Elif Yuksel; David Katzka; C Prakash Gyawali; Melina Mashi; John Pandolfino; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Joseph T Krill; Rishi D Naik; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Michael D Holzman; David O Francis; C Gaelyn Garrett; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 12.045
Authors: John E Pandolfino; Joel E Richter; Tina Ours; Jason M Guardino; Jennifer Chapman; Peter J Kahrilas Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Radu Tutuian; Frank Zerbib; Benjamin D Rogers; Marzio Frazzoni; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Nicola de Bortoli; Marcelo F Vela; Daniel Sifrim Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 22.682