Literature DB >> 12738450

Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.

John E Pandolfino1, Joel E Richter, Tina Ours, Jason M Guardino, Jennifer Chapman, Peter J Kahrilas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Limitations of catheter-based esophageal pH monitoring are discomfort, inconvenience, and interference with normal activity. An alternative to conventional pH monitoring is the wireless Medtronic Bravo pH System. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, performance, and tolerability of this system.
METHODS: A total of 44 healthy subjects and 41 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were studied for a 2-day period. The pH telemetry capsule was positioned transorally 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using endoscopic measurement. The signal transmitted from the capsule was received and recorded by a small, pager-sized receiver, and pH data were subsequently uploaded to a computer for analysis.
RESULTS: Successful 24-h pH studies were completed in 82 subjects (96%). During the 24-h study period the median percentage of the time that pH was <4 was 2.3% (95th percentile, 5.9%) in controls and 6.5% (range, 0.8-27.6) in GERD patients. In 76 subjects (89%), 36-48 h recordings were obtained. For the extended period the median percentage of the time that pH was <40 was 2.0% (95% percentile, 5.3%) in controls and 6.6% (range, 1.0-26.7) in GERD patients. Capsules required endoscopic removal in three subjects (4%). Optimal sensitivity in distinguishing controls from reflux patients was achieved when analyzed from the perspective of the worst of the 2 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The wireless Bravo pH System successfully recorded esophageal acid exposure in 96% of the patients during a 24-h period and in 89% of subjects for >36 h. The 95th percentile for the 2-day recordings in control subjects was 5.3%, slightly higher than observed with conventional systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738450     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07398.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  85 in total

1.  Impedance-pH monitoring on medications does not reliably confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients referred for antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Marc A Ward; Christy M Dunst; Ezra N Teitelbaum; Valerie J Halpin; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanström; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.

Authors:  Michelle S Han; Michal J Lada; Dylan R Nieman; Andreas Tschoner; Christian G Peyre; Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Capsule pH monitoring: is wireless more?

Authors:  R H Holloway
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?

Authors:  J E Pandolfino; Q Zhang; M A Schreiner; S Ghosh; M P Roth; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Functional oesophago-gastric junction imaging.

Authors:  Barry P McMahon; Asbjørn M Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Transoral incisionless fundoplication 2.0 procedure using EsophyX™ for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Arul Immanuel; Matthew Schuchert; Zdenek Dubrava; Andrew Smith; Peter Nottle; David I Watson; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Manometric features of eosinophilic esophagitis in esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  S Roman; I Hirano; M A Kwiatek; N Gonsalves; J Chen; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  New method for long-term monitoring of intragastric pH.

Authors:  Shouko Ono; Mototsugu Kato; Yuji Ono; Masahiro Asaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Prolapse gastropathy syndrome may be a predictor of pathologic acid reflux.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Hyung-Keun Kim; Young-Seok Cho; Hiun-Suk Chae; Byung-Wook Kim; Jin-Il Kim; Sok-Won Han; Kyu-Yong Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.