In this work, benzotriazolium salts have been introduced as efficient, readily accessible, bench-stable Lewis acid catalysts. Though these sorts of N-heterocyclic compounds have found wide applications as ionic liquids or electrolytes, their Lewis acid catalytic activity remained unexplored. Herein, their potential as Lewis acid catalysts was demonstrated in two prototypical allylic and Nazarov cyclization reactions, showing a matching reactivity and allowing low catalytic loadings (down to 0.5 mol %).
In this work, benzotriazolium salts have been introduced as efficient, readily accessible, bench-stable Lewis acid catalysts. Though these sorts of N-heterocyclic compounds have found wide applications as ionic liquids or electrolytes, their Lewis acid catalytic activity remained unexplored. Herein, their potential as Lewis acid catalysts was demonstrated in two prototypical allylic and Nazarov cyclization reactions, showing a matching reactivity and allowing low catalytic loadings (down to 0.5 mol %).
The ability of Lewis acids (LAs)
to form acid–base adducts and activate small molecules has
been widely used in synthesis and catalysis,[1] hence being established as a powerful tool in a large variety of
chemical processes. Although classical main-group Lewis acids containing
elements with low-lying free orbitals like boron, aluminum, silicon,
or phosphorus have been studied intensively,[1,2] nitrogen-centered
Lewis acids have just recently evoked a rising interest. This field
was most probably long neglected since the common compounds showing
an N-centered electrophilic behavior, such as nitrenes, azides, or
diazo derivatives, led to rather unstable Lewis acid–Lewis
base adducts or presented strong oxidizing properties like nitronium
salts, hampering their application as Lewis acids.[3] Alternatively, the carbene-isoelectronic cationic nitrenium
ions have proved more suitable for the design of novel nitrogen Lewis
acid structures. Hence, although previously prepared, since the study
on the electronic features of stable triazolium ions by the group
of Boche in 1996,[4] this type of nitrenium
salt became an important building block for the synthesis of organocatalysts,
serving as precatalysts,[5] dual catalysts,[6] or ligands.[7] Nevertheless,
stable adduct formation between triazinium ions and several Lewis
bases was reported by Gandelman et al. in 2017 (Scheme A, left),[8] which
resembled the Lewis acidic behavior that was already known for its
heavier phosphonium[9,10] and arsenium[11] analogues. This Lewis acid reactivity was then further
demonstrated by the group of Stephan using indazolium salts (Scheme A, middle)[12] and extended to frustrated Lewis pair (FLP)[13] driven chemistry (Scheme A, right).[14]
Scheme 1
(A) Nitrenium-Based LA Structures Employed in Acid–Base Adduct
Formation and FLP Chemistry, (B) First Nitrenium LA Catalysis, and
(C) Benzotriazolium Salts (BZTs) as Novel LA Catalysts
Furthermore, only very recently has the unprecedented
use of nitrenium-based
Lewis acids in catalysis been described. Thus, in 2020 Goicoechea
et al. employed catalytic amounts of a triazinium cation to promote
several organic reactions, including hydrogenations, reductions, and
a Friedel–Crafts reaction (Scheme B).[15] However,
in this pioneering report, only six-membered triaziniums have been
proven as efficient N-based Lewis acids, and a few limited types of
reactions involving mainly carbonyl and silane activation could be
accomplished to date. Therefore, the development of further nitrenium-based
catalysts with enhanced and/or adjusted Lewis acid properties to allow
for a broader synthetic application is still highly desirable.Inspired by state-of-the-art and encouraged to solve some of the
current reactivity limitations, we envisioned benzotriazolium salts,
which are widely used as ionic liquids (ILs), electrolytes, or fluids,[16] as suitable new platforms to provide alternative
potent N-based Lewis acid catalyst structures. Despite their ready
accessibility and easy modulability that make them excellent candidates
for this purpose, their catalytic activity as Lewis acids remained
rather unexplored.[17] We herein present
the first example of benzotriazolium-based Lewis acids as efficient,
bench-stable catalysts for two benchmark reactions implying a carbonyl
and hydroxyl group activation, such as allylic and Nazarov cyclizations
toward synthetically valuable chromenes and cyclopentenones, respectively
(Scheme C).We started our investigation by preparing a series of 1-methyl-3-methyl
(1a–d), 3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)
(1e–f), and 3-aryl (1g–i) triazolium salts with different counteranions
upon methylation of the corresponding benzotriazole with MeOTf or
Me3OBF4, followed, when needed, by a subsequent
counteranion exchange (Figure A, see SI for details). Alternatively,
the iodide salt was also prepared by reaction with MeI, and the anion
was later exchanged to BF4– and a BArF-type anion with AgBF4 and NaBArF4 or Na/KB(C6F5)4, respectively.
Similarly, various methoxytriazoliums 2a–d and previously reported triaziniums 3a–c[8,15] were also synthesized. To evaluate the relative
Lewis acidity of the triazolium salts, the Gutmann–Beckett
test (GBT)[18] was then performed in acetone-d6, and the acceptor number (AN) was calculated
(see Table S1 in the SI), revealing an
apparent moderate Lewis acidity (≤20 AN).[19] Additionally, the global electrophilicity index (GEI) and
fluoride ion affinity were calculated for a series of 1,3-dimethyl
benzotriazoles (1a, 1b, and 1d) with their corresponding counteranion at the DFT level of theory,
supporting the postulation of a negligible influence of the anion
on the Lewis acidity (see SI for details).
Hence, the exchange of BF4– with Na or
K[B(C6F5)4] and NaBArF4 to bulkier counteranions resulted in a counter-intuitively
slight decrease of Lewis acidity. Moreover, the analysis of the X-ray
structures of the benzotriazolium series 1a–d[21] revealed the expected increasing
benzotriazole–anion distance trend upon an increase of the
bulkiness of the anion from OTf– to the less coordinative
barfates (Figure B,
see SI for details).
Figure 1
(A) Synthesis of benzotriazolium
salts 1–2. (B) X-ray structures of
representative derivatives 1a–d (ellipsoid
contours given at the
50% probability level).
(A) Synthesis of benzotriazolium
salts 1–2. (B) X-ray structures of
representative derivatives 1a–d (ellipsoid
contours given at the
50% probability level).Next, we focused on the evaluation of their reactivity
toward cyclization
reactions. We chose the allylic cyclization upon the activation of
the alcohol 4a to form 2H-chromene (5a)[22] in THF as a benchmark reaction
to test the ability of benzotriazolium salts to act as Lewis acid
catalysts (Scheme ). This cyclization did not proceed in the absence of a Lewis acid,
even at elevated temperatures (70 °C).
Scheme 2
Catalyst Screening
for the Allyl Cyclization Reaction of 4a
Conditions: 4a (0.2
mmol) and LA catalyst (10 mol %) in THF (0.1 M) for 18 h at 70 °C
under Ar. Yield determined by 1H NMR using CH2Br2 as an internal standard. (See SI for full optimization.)
Same yield for LA catalyst obtained from methylation with Me3OBF4 and exchange from I– with
AgBF4, respectively.
Reaction performed under air.
Catalyst Screening
for the Allyl Cyclization Reaction of 4a
Conditions: 4a (0.2
mmol) and LA catalyst (10 mol %) in THF (0.1 M) for 18 h at 70 °C
under Ar. Yield determined by 1H NMR using CH2Br2 as an internal standard. (See SI for full optimization.)Same yield for LA catalyst obtained from methylation with Me3OBF4 and exchange from I– with
AgBF4, respectively.Reaction performed under air.The nitrenium
series were then tested using 10 mol % of catalytic
loading under an argon atmosphere. Dismissed yields or decompositions
were generally observed for most of the Lewis acid catalysts 1–3, as well as for the strong Lewis acid
BF3·Et2O. Gratifyingly, the LA catalysts 1b, 2b, and 3c performed well in
this benchmark reaction, showing up to 77% yield with catalyst 1b. This result could not be improved by changing the temperature
or solvent, which both caused a decrease in yield (see SI). Moreover, the presence of oxygen led to
a detriment of the yield, providing the product 5a in
only 33% yield when the reaction was run under air with 1b, most probably due to partial oxidation/aromatization of the product.To confirm that the catalytic activation is induced by our triazolium
species, we carried out some control experiments. Since this kind
of reaction can also be promoted by strong Brønsted acids that
might be formed in the media, we tested our system in the presence
of 1 mol % of triflic acid or Brookhart’s-type acid [H(OEt2)2]+[B(C6F5)4]−[23] as catalysts
at both 70 °C and rt, but only decomposition could be detected
(see SI, Table S6 for more details). This
is in line with the observed beneficial moderate Lewis acidity to
avoid decomposition while allowing for an efficient promotion of this
cyclization reaction. Moreover, we were able to reproduce the good
results with 1b obtained through a different synthetic
approach by I– anion exchange using AgBF4 instead of direct dimethylation with an excess of Me3OBF4 to rule out any traces of HBF4 or Me3OBF4. Furthermore, we used NaBF4 in
catalytic amounts to exclude any influence of the counteranion on
the activation process of this reaction. As expected, the ring closure
did not proceed, proving that the triazolium cation is indeed inducing
the ring closure.With the optimized conditions in hand, the
scope of the allylic
cyclization was explored next (Scheme ). First of all, it is worthy to note that the reaction
could be scaled up to 1 mmol without any significant detriment on
the yield (65% vs 77%). Moreover, the formation of the products bearing
different substitution patterns was pleasantly observed in every case.
The methyl substitution at both the aryl and allylic moiety of the
substrate gave the desired products 5b–d in moderate to good yields (53–76%), while the π-extended
compound 5e showed a high stability, leading to a good
88% isolated yield. Moreover, strong electron-donating groups such
as methoxy were well tolerated, providing 6- and 5-substituted chromenes 5f and 5g in 83% and 53% yield, respectively.
Finally, less reactive substrates bearing electron-withdrawing groups
such as halogen or nitro substituents could also be enrolled in the
reaction, providing chromenes 5h–j in moderate yields (30–50%),[24] while substrates with internal olefins were unreactive.
Scheme 3
Scope of
the Allylic Cyclization to 2H-Chromenes 5
1.0 mmol scale.
Yield determined by 1H
NMR using CH2Br2 as an internal standard. Isolated
yield given in brackets.
Scope of
the Allylic Cyclization to 2H-Chromenes 5
1.0 mmol scale.Yield determined by 1H
NMR using CH2Br2 as an internal standard. Isolated
yield given in brackets.Due to the already
known nitrenium activation of carbonyl groups
for deoxygenation reactions (see Scheme B), we decided to further investigate the
nitrenium series 1–3 in the Nazarov
cyclization. This reaction is known to be activated by either LA metal-based
catalysts[25] or phosphonium cations[10] and represents one of the most versatile methods
for the synthesis of natural products and bioactive molecules containing
cyclopentenone moieties.[26] In particular,
we chose dienone 6a as the model substrate[27] to determine the activity and requirements of
the Lewis acid nitrenium salts (Table ).
Table 1
Catalyst Screening in the Model Nazarov
Cyclization of 6a
entry
LA catalyst (mol %)
yield 7a (%)b
1
1b (1)
47
2
1c (1)
30
3
1d (1)
99(86)c
4
2d (1)
15
5
3a (1)
7
6
1d (1)
(77)d,e
7
1d (5)
>99
8
1d (0.5)
69f
Conditions: 6 (0.2
mmol) and LA catalyst in CH2Cl2 (0.1 M) at rt
for 24 h under Ar.
Yield
determined by 1H NMR using CH2Br2 as an internal standard.
>20:1 dr determined by 1H NMR for all catalytic reactions.
Isolated yield in brackets.
Reaction performed under air.
0.4 mmol scale reaction.
Conditions: 6 (0.2
mmol) and LA catalyst in CH2Cl2 (0.1 M) at rt
for 24 h under Ar.Yield
determined by 1H NMR using CH2Br2 as an internal standard.>20:1 dr determined by 1H NMR for all catalytic reactions.Isolated yield in brackets.Reaction performed under air.0.4 mmol scale reaction.Aiming at identifying highly efficient catalyst structures, 1 mol % of the salts 1–3 was initially employed at room temperature in CH2Cl2 as standard conditions. To our delight, LA catalysts 1b–d, 2d, and 3a were able to promote the cyclization ranking from 7 to 99% conversion
(entries 1–5), whereas the other nitrenium salts, including
the already established triazinium catalyst 3c, showed
no catalytic activity in this reaction (see SI for full screening). However, there was not a perfect correlation
between the LA strength and yield of the cyclopentanone 7. Thus, catalyst 1d with a slightly lower LA strength
than the other catalysts led to full conversion and an excellent 86%
isolated yield (entry 3). Moreover, performing this reaction under
air instead of an inert atmosphere resulted in an insignificant drop
of yield, which also shows the excellent bench, moisture, and air
stability of this catalyst (entry 6). Additionally, while increasing
the amount of catalyst to 5 mol % resulted in a similar nearly quantitative
yield (entry 7). The remarkable performance of triazolium 1d allowed the activation of the dienone system 6a even
at a 0.5 mol % loading to provide 7a in a good 69% yield
(entry 8).These results encouraged us to further investigate
the relative
kinetics and potency of our catalytic system by monitoring the reaction
with selected nitrenium LAs by 1H NMR (Figure ; shown 3 h, see SI for 15 h monitoring). For this purpose, we
chose 5 mol % of catalyst loading due to the low conversion for most
of the studied nitrenium salts during the catalyst screening with
1 mol %. The highly activating triazolium 1d showed full
conversion after only 1 h. Due to this rapid evolution, the reaction
with 1 mol % of 1d was also investigated, in which a
good 70% yield could still be observed after 3 h. As expected, for
the less activating triazinium 3a or catalysts 1b and 2d, a low linear conversion with less
than 20% or 10% yield after 3 h was observed. Moreover, the control
experiments with Na[B(C6F5)4] and 1a showed no catalytic activity at all.
Figure 2
Kinetic experiment with
an exemplary choice of catalysts 1–3 (5 mol %) in the Nazarov cyclization
(see SI for full study).
Kinetic experiment with
an exemplary choice of catalysts 1–3 (5 mol %) in the Nazarov cyclization
(see SI for full study).Lastly, the scope and limitations of the Nazarov
cyclization were
explored (Scheme ).
The upscaling of the standard reaction to 1 mmol using 1 mol % of
the Lewis acid catalyst 1d was first performed, showing
the robustness of the method by providing a similar 75% yield. A different
substitution on the ester moiety was well-tolerated (Me, 7b and tBu, 7c), in which tert-butyl led to the best result with a 98% yield on the product 7c. Furthermore, the different substitution on the R2 group was also investigated. While the less reactive dienones bearing
neutral Ph or weak activating p-tolyl rests (products: 7d, 81%; 7e, 62%) or electron-deficient aryl
groups (product 7f, 46%) required 5 mol % of the catalyst
to provide synthetically useful conversions, electron-rich systems
such as 3,4,5-triMeOPh provided the corresponding product 7g in almost quantitative yield.
Scheme 4
Scope of the Nazarov Cyclization
Results with 5 mol
% of 1d in brackets.
Yields of the isolated products are given.
Scope of the Nazarov Cyclization
Results with 5 mol
% of 1d in brackets.Yields of the isolated products are given.In summary, we have introduced benzotriazolium salts as
a new class
of bench-stable and efficient N-centered Lewis-acid catalysts. The
new structures were benchmarked with already known nitrenium Lewis
acids such as triazinium cations, showing a remarkably higher activity
in the studied allylic cyclization and Nazarov reactions, implying
a hydroxyl and carbonyl activation, respectively. Moreover, kinetic
reaction monitoring of the Nazarov cyclization demonstrated the high
reactivity of these N-based Lewis acid structures, which was confirmed
by the low 1 mol % catalyst loading required and already shows their
potential for a wide-ranging field of applications in Lewis acid catalysis.
Authors: Erik S Musiek; Rebecca S Breeding; Ginger L Milne; Giuseppe Zanoni; Jason D Morrow; Bethann McLaughlin Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2006-04-21 Impact factor: 5.372